Investigating the Relationship between Food Pairings and Plate Waste from Elementary School Lunches

Ariun Ishdorj^1*, Oral Capps Jr.¹, Maureen Storey², Peter S. Murano³

¹Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
²Alliance for Potato Research and Education, McLean, VA, USA.
³Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/fns.2015.611107                

Abstract

Plate waste, defined as the quantity of edible food left uneaten after a meal, is a challenge for schools participating in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). The new nutrition standards in the NSLP of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) were implemented at the beginning of school year (SY) 2012-2013. School foodservice authorities were concerned that the new standards would result in increased plate waste and reduced participation, especially by students who paid full prices for lunch. There are many reasons for plate waste, including students’ dislike of the foods served, the composition of meals, the environment in which students are eating, the lack of time to eat, or perhaps other factors. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between entrée/vegetable “pairings” and plate waste by elementary school students pre- and post-implementation of the new school meal standards. Plate waste was measured to determine which entrée/vegetable pairs produced the least amount of waste. Plate waste of 144 and 305 entrée/vegetable pairings was analyzed, pre- and post-implementation, respectively. Our results indicated that more nutritious meals were offered during the post-implementation period. The new school meal standards led to no significant changes in entrée plate waste, but vegetable plate waste increased by 5.6%. As such, increases in the combined entrée/vegetable plate waste were evident from 40.4% pre-implementation to 43.5% post-implementation. The top five vegetables in terms of popularity were all starchy vegetables, the majority of which were potatoes in various processed forms. The least popular vegetables were dark-green leafy vegetables, such as steamed broccoli, both pre- and post-implementation. Chicken nuggets were the most popular entrée and were wasted the least. Understanding the dynamics of food pairings and providing desirable entrée and vegetable pairings can help reduce waste from school lunches.

Keywords

Food Pairings, National School Lunch Program, Nutrients, Plate Waste, Vegetables

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	IOM (Institute of Medicine) (2009) School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.
[2]	U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010. Washington DC.
[3]	White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President. Solving the Problem of Childhood Obesity within a Generation. http://www.letsmove.gov/white-house-task-force-childhood-obesity-report-president.
[4]	U.S. Department of Agriculture (2012) Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs; final rule. Federal Register, 4088-167.
[5]	Buzby, J.C. and Guthrie, J.F. (2002) Plate Waste in School Nutrition Programs: Final Report to Congress. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
[6]	GAO (2014) Implementing Nutrition Changes Was Challenging and Clarification of Oversight Requirements is Needed. U.S. Government Accountability Office Report, Washington DC.
[7]	Byker, C.J., Farris, A.R., Marcenelle, M., Davis, G.C. and Serrano, E.L. (2014) Food Waste in a School Nutrition Program after Implementation of New Lunch Program Guidelines. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 46, 406-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.009
[8]	Cohen, J.F., Richardson, S., Austin, S.B., Economos, C.D. and Rimm, E.B. (2013) School Lunch Waste among Middle School Students: Nutrients Consumed and Costs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 114-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.060
[9]	Schwartz, M.B., Henderson, K.E., Read, M., Danna, N. and Ickovics, J.R. (2015) New School Meal Regulations Increase Fruit Consumption and Do Not Increase Total Plate Waste. Childhood Obesity, 11, 242-247.
[10]	Gase, L.N., McCarthy, W.J., Robles, B. and Kuo, T. (2014) Student Receptivity to New School Meal Offerings: Assessing Fruit and Vegetable Waste among Middle School Students in the Los Angeles Unified School District. Preventative Medicine, 67, S28-S33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.013
[11]	Adams, M.A., Pelletier, R.L., Zive, M.M. and Sallis, J.F. (2005) Salad Bars and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Elementary Schools: A Plate Waste Study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105, 1789-1792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.013
[12]	Turner, L. and Chaloupka, F.J. (2014) Perceived Reactions of Elementary School Students to Changes in School Lunches after Implementation of the United States Department of Agriculture’s New Meals Standards: Minimal Backlash, but Rural and Socioeconomic Disparities Exist. Childhood Obesity, 10, 349-356.
[13]	Cohen, J.F., Richardson, S., Parker, E., Catalano, P.J. and Rimm, E.B. (2014) Impact of the New U.S. Department of Agriculture School Meal Standards on Food Selection, Consumption, and Waste. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46, 388-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.013
[14]	Smith, S.L. and Cunningham-Sabo, L. (2014) Food Choice, Plate Waste and Nutrient Intake of Elementary- and Middle-School Students Participating in the US National School Lunch Program. Public Health Nutrition, 17, 1255-1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013001894
[15]	Bergman, E.A., Buergel, N.S., Englund, T.F. and Femrite, A. (2004) The Relationship of Meal and Recess Schedules to Plate Waste in Elementary Schools. Journal of Child Nutrition & Management, 28.
[16]	Institute of Education Sciences. Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey, 2000-01, 2005-06, 2010-11, and 2011-12. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
[17]	Rogozenski, J.G. and Moskowitz, H.R. (1983) A System for the Preference Evaluation of Cyclic Menus. Foodservice Research International, 2, 139-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4506.1983.tb00270.x
[18]	Jimenez, M., Rodriguez, D., Greene, N., Zellner, D.A., Cardello, A.V. and Nestrud, M.(2015) Seeing a Meal Is Not Eating It: Hedonic Context Effects Differ for Visually Presented and Actually Eaten Foods. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 96-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.015
[19]	Ishdorj, A, Crepinsek, M.K. and Jensen, H.H. (2013) Children’s Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables: Do School Environment and Policies Affect Choices at School and Away from School? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35, 341-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt003