Share This Article:

Fair Plan 6: Quo Vadis the 80%-Emission-Reduction-By-2050 Plan?

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2164KB) PP. 120-128
DOI: 10.4236/acs.2015.52009    5,099 Downloads   5,425 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

In our Fair Plan 5 paper, we compared the CO2 emissions of the 80%-Emission-Reduction-By-2050 (80/50) Plan with the CO2 emissions of our Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate. We found that the 80/50 Plan reduced CO2 emissions more rapidly than necessary to achieve the principal objective of the Fair Plan: to keep Global Warming (GW) within the 2 (3.6) limit adopted by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) “to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”. Here, we ask the “What If” question: “What would the GW of the 80/50 Plan be post 2100 if its CO2 emissions post 2100 were kept at their 2100 value?” We find that although the GW of the 80/50 Plan decreases slightly over part of the 21st century, it does not remain constant thereafter. Rather, the GW of the 80/50 Plan begins to increase in 2088, exceeds that of the Fair Plan beginning in 2230, exceeds the 2 (3.6) limit of the UNFCCC in 2596, and ends the millennium at 2.7 (4.8). Thus, not only does the 80/50 Plan phase out humanity’s CO2 emissions faster than necessary to fulfill the UNFCCC constraint, it also fails that constraint if its CO2 emissions post 2100 are kept at their 2100 value. Accordingly, we believe that the Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate is superior to the 80/50 Plan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Schlesinger, M. , Ring, M. and Cross, E. (2015) Fair Plan 6: Quo Vadis the 80%-Emission-Reduction-By-2050 Plan?. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 5, 120-128. doi: 10.4236/acs.2015.52009.

References

[1] Schlesinger, M.E., Ring, M.J., Lindner, D., Cross, E. and Prince, V. (2014) Fair Plan 5: A Critical Appraisal of Five Congressional Bills to Reduce US CO2 Emissions. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 4, 866-873.
www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51780#.VIchH2TF9yQ
[2] Schlesinger, M.E., Ring, M.J. and Cross, E.F. (2012) A Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate. Journal of Environmental Protection, 3, 455-461.
www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=20038
[3] Schlesinger, M.E., Ring, M.J. and Cross, E.F. (2012) A Revised Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate. Journal of Environmental Protection, 3, 1330-1335.
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=23864
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.310151
[4] Schlesinger, M.E., Lindner, D., Ring, M.J. and Cross, E. (2013) A Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate: 3. Outlook for Global Temperature Change Throughout the 21st Century. Journal of Environmental Protection, 4, 653-664. www.scirp.org/journal/Paperinformation.aspx?PaperID=33421
[5] Schlesinger, M.E., Ring, M.J., Lindner, D., Cross, E. and Prince, V. (2014) Fair Plan 4: Safeguarding the Climate of “This Island Earth”. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 4, 431-436. www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48168#.VI3K5mTF9yQ
[6] Riahi, K., Gruebler, A. and Nakicenovic, N. (2007) Scenarios of Long-Term Socio-Economic and Environmental Development under Climate Stabilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 887-935.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.026
[7] Keigwin, L.D., Sachs, J.P., Rosenthal, Y. and Boyle, E.A. (2005) The 8200 Year B.P. Event in the Slope Water System, Western Subpolar North Atlantic. Paleoceanography, 20, PA2003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001074
[8] United Nations (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
[9] Van Hollen, J.C. (2014) Healthy Climate and Family Security Act of 2014, in H.R.5271. U.S. House of Representatives, Washington DC.
[10] Meinshausen, M., et al. (2011) The RCP Greenhouse Gas Concentrations and their Extension from 1765 to 2500. Climatic Change, 109, 213-241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z
[11] Alfsen, K.H. and Berntsen, T. (1999) An Efficient and Accurate Carbon Cycle Model for Use in Simple Climate Models. CICERO, Oslo, 14.
[12] Alley, R.B., Clark, P.U., Huybrechts, P. and Joughin, I. (2005) Ice-Sheet and Sea-Level Changes. Science, 310, 456-460.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1114613
[13] National Geographic (2014) If All the Ice Melted: Explore the World’s New Coastlines If Sea Level Rises 216 Feet.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/09/rising-seas/if-ice-melted-map
[14] Fuglesvedt, J.S. and Berntsen, T. (1999) A Simple Model for Scenario Studies of Changes in Climate. Version 1.0, CICERO: Oslo, 59.
[15] Schlesinger, M.E., Andronova, N.G., Entwistle, B., Ghanem, A., Ramankutty, N., Wang, W. and Yang, F. (1997) Modeling and Simulation of Climate and Climate Change, in Past and Present Variability of the Solar-Terrestrial System: Measurement, Data Analysis and Theoretical Models. In: Cini Castagnoli, G. and Provenzale, A., Eds., Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” CXXXIII, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 389-429.
[16] Ring, M.J., Lindner, D., Cross, E.F. and Schlesinger, M.E. (2012) Causes of the Global Warming Observed Since the 19th Century. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 2, 401-415.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/acs.2012.24035
[17] IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007—The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.