Share This Article:

Interactivity and Information- Communication Technologies in Chemical Engineering Classes

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2015.32002    3,507 Downloads   3,830 Views  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a new contextualization of the so-called scientific method in teaching practices in science and engineering education. We report an objectification in information and communication technologies (ICT) for simulate the reaction rates during an class and its inclusion in the above-mentioned pedagogical purpose, that, in tune with the current realities of schools, rehearses reflections of a future with another horizon for teaching/learning engineering and other sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Santiago, A. , Silva, C. , Machado, A. and Washington, M. (2015) Interactivity and Information- Communication Technologies in Chemical Engineering Classes. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 8-14. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.32002.

References

[1] NSB (2007) Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education, ad hoc Task Group on Engineering Education, Committee on Education and Human Resources, Draft Report, July 23, 2007. National Science Foundation, Washington.
[2] Bordogna, J., et al. (1993) Engineering Education: Innovation through Integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 38.
[3] Alves, G. (2006) A produ??o da Escola Pública Contemporanea. Autores Associados, Campinas.
[4] Brown, J.S. (2006) New Learning Environments in the 21st Century. Futures Forum, Aspen, CO: Futures Project, 2005; also MIT Symposium on iCampus, December 2006.
[5] Duderstadt, J.J., et al. (2005) Cyberinfra-structure. A Special Issue of Issues in Science and Technology, Vol. XXII, No.1. National Academies Press, Washington.
[6] Dweck, C., et al. (2007) Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Tran-sition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263.
[7] Hargreaves, A. (2003) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. College Press, NY.
[8] Sim?es, D. (2002) Linguagem e express?o no ensino de Física. Caderno Seminal, 14, 109-124.
[9] Marchesi, A. and Martín, E. (2003) Tecnología e aprendizaje. Editorial SM, Madrid.
[10] Moran, J.M. (2009) Especialista em projetos inovadores na educa??o presencial e a distancia. In: Moran, J.M., Eds., Novas Tecnologias e Media??o Pedagógica, Papirus, S?o Paulo, 15th Edition, 22-24.
[11] Moreira, M.A. (1999) Aprendizagem Significativa. Editora Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
[12] Abbott, J. (2004) We Are a Small Group Species. Source: 21st Century Learning Initiative. http://changelearning.ca/articles/we-are-small-group-species
[13] Pelgrum, W. and Law, N. (2003) ICT in Education around the World: Trends, Problems and Prospects. UNESCO-IIEP, Paris.
[14] Silva, C.E., Santiago, A.J., Machado, A.F. and Assis, A.S. (2014) Eletromagnetismo: Fundamentos e simula??es. Pearson Education do Brasil, S?o Paulo.
[15] Sim?es, D. and García, F. (Orgs.) (2014) A Pesquisa Científica como Linguagem e Práxis. Dialogarts, Rio de Janeiro.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.