Share This Article:

To Open or Not to Open: Korean Rice Market

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2487KB) PP. 253-259
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2014.54023    3,276 Downloads   3,645 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Although the “tariff only” principle was adopted in the Uruguay Round (UR) negotiations on agricultural products, Korea was able to apply special treatment to its rice and postpone tariffication of rice imports. After two decades of delay, the Korean government officially announced its decision to open its rice market beginning in 2015. This paper examines whether it would be legally possible for the Korean government to postpone the tariffication of rice imports beyond 2014. In order to address the question, this paper outlines the status of Korean rice in the WTO for the last twenty years. Then, it analyzes the arguments of those who are against tarifficating rice and of those who are in support of it. Based on the analysis, it concludes that Korea cannot postpone tariffication under Annex 5 of the Agreement on Agriculture. While it may request for a waiver under Article IX of the WTO Agreement, a careful and thorough examination is required to decide whether to postpone the tariffication beyond 2014.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Cho, Y. (2014). To Open or Not to Open: Korean Rice Market. Beijing Law Review, 5, 253-259. doi: 10.4236/blr.2014.54023.

References

[1] Choi, W. (2014). Opening Korean Rice Market—It Cannot Be Postponed Again. Chosun Il-bo.
http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2014/02/18/2014021804770.html
[2] Delay of Rice Tariffication Works against the Farmers as well as the Government (2014). Herald Economy.
http://news.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud=20140305000319&md=20140308005344_BK
[3] GATT (1980). Procedure for Modification and Rectification of Schedule of Tariff Concessions: Decision of 28 March 1980, L/4962, 28 March 1980.
[4] Government Can Postpone the Tariffication of Rice Imports (2014). Voice of People.
http://www.vop.co.kr/A00000770919.html
[5] Keep a High Tariff on Rice (2014). Seoul Shin-Moon.
http://seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20140719001014
[6] Kim, Y. (2014). Rice Is Already Being Imported. JoongAng Il-bo.
http://article.joins.com/news/article/article.asp?total_id=15157239&cloc=olink|article|default
[7] Korean Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2005). Outcomes of the Rice Negotiations and Future Plan: Report to the Agriculture, Forestry, Oceans and Fisheries Committee of the National Assembly, 253rd Session on April 18, 2005.
http://seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20140719001014
[8] Lee, H. (2014). Opening of the Rice Market: It Is Not an Obligation under International Law. Chosun Il-bo.
http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2014/03/02/2014030202447.html
[9] Opening Rice Market: Gain or Loss? (2014). Segye Il-bo.
http://www.segye.com/content/html/2014/03/03/20140303005324.html?OutUrl=naver
[10] WTO (2004). Notification of Initiating the Negotiations Set out in Section B of Annex 5 of the Agreement on Agriculture— Communication from Korea, G/AG/W/62, G/L/668, 20 January 2004.
[11] WTO (2005). Certification of Modifications and Rectifications to SCHDULE LX—Republic of Korea, WT/Let/492, 13 April 2005.
[12] WTO (2012). Request for Waiver on Special Treatment for Rice of the Philippines, G/C/W/665, 20 March 2012.
[13] WTO (2014). Request for Waiver on Special Treatment for Rice of the Philippines, G/C/W/665/Rev.4, 27 March 2014.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.