Share This Article:

Above and Below Ground Interactions in Monoculture and Intercropping of Onion and Lettuce in Greenhouse Conditions

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:3390KB) PP. 3319-3327
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2014.521347    3,619 Downloads   4,299 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Intercropping has been seen as an advantageous strategy in sustainable agriculture. Plants however interact with one another both above and below ground with members of the same species (intraspecific) or members of a different species (interspecific) for nutrients, water and light. It is therefore essential to understand these interactions when intercropped. The objective was to examine the above and below ground interactions between onion and lettuce in monocrop and intercrop systems. We examined the various possible interactions (no competition, above ground, below ground, or full) using a full factorial randomized design under greenhouse conditions. Onion yield was highest in intraspecific above ground competition and lowest in below ground and full interspecific competition with lettuce. Dry weight of onions in above ground competition with lettuce was significantly greater than that of the control group. Fresh weight of lettuce leaves were highest in below ground and full interspecific competition treatments. The hectare model and yield results suggest that there is strong below ground competitive effect between onion and lettuce in intercrop. Asymetric interspecific facilitation was found: facilitation by onion led to increased lettuce yield but a negative effect of lettuce on onion yield was observed. Knowledge of competitive interactions between component crops can have several applications in sustainable agricultural as it helps to match the most efficient species under specific conditions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Haan, J. and Vasseur, L. (2014) Above and Below Ground Interactions in Monoculture and Intercropping of Onion and Lettuce in Greenhouse Conditions. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 3319-3327. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.521347.

References

[1] Mariotti, M., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L. and Arduini, I. (2009) Above and below Ground Competition between Barley, Wheat, Lupin and Vetch in a Cereal and Legume Intercropping System. Grass and Forage Science, 64, 401-412.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2009.00705.x
[2] Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., Damalas, C.A. and Vlachostergios, D.N. (2011) Annual Intercrops: An Alternative Pathway for Sustainable Agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 396-410.
[3] Park, S.E., Benjamin, L.R. and Watkinson, A.R. (2002) Comparing Biological Productivity in Cropping Systems: A Competition Approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 416-426.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00732.x
[4] Morsy, S.M., Drgham, E.A. and Mohamed, G.M. (2009) Effect of Garlic and Onion Extracts or Their Intercropping on Suppressing Damping-Off and Powdery Mildew Diseases and Growth Characteristics of Cucumber. Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology, 37, 35-46.
[5] Tilman, D. (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
[6] Jose, S., Williams, R. and Zamora, D. (2006) Below Ground Ecological Interactions in Mixed-Species Forest Plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 233, 231-239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.014
[7] Baumann, D.T., Bastiaans, L. and Kropff, M.J. (2001) Competition and Crop Performance in a Leek-Celery Intercropping System. Crop Science, 41, 764-774.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.413764x
[8] Andersen, M.K., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P. and Jensen, E.S. (2004) Biomass Production, Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Inorganic N Use in Dual and Tri-Component Annual Intercrops. Plant and Soil, 266, 273-287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0997-1
[9] Andersen, M.K., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Weiner, J. and Jensen, E.S. (2007) Competitive Dynamics in Two- and Three-Component Intercrops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 545-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01289.x
[10] Jaime, M., Roberts, L. and McDonald, M.R. (2013) Growing Onion Transplants in Plug Trays. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/01-019.htm
[11] Armas, C., Ordiales, R. and Pugnaire, F.I. (2004) Measuring Plant Interactions: A New Comparative Index. Ecology, 85, 2682-2686.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0650
[12] Qasem, J.R. (2006) Response of Onion (Allium cepa L.) Plants to Fertilizers, Weed Competition Duration, and Planting Times in the Central Jordan Valley. Weed Biology and Management, 6, 212-220.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2006.00216.x
[13] Baumann, D.T., Bastiaans, L., Goudriaan, J., van Laar, H.H. and Kropfl, M.J. (2002) Analysing Crop Yield and Plant Quality in an Intercropping System Using an Eco-Physiological Model for Interplant Competition. Agricultural Systems, 73, 173-203.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00084-1
[14] Guvenc, I. and Yildirim, E. (2006) Increased Productivity with Intercropping Systems in Cabbage Production. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28, 29-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J064v28n04_04
[15] Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Guo, T., Bao, X., Smith, A.F. and Smith, S.E. (2006) Root Distribution and Interactions between Intercropped Species. Oecologia, 147, 280-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0256-4
[16] Narla, R.D., Muthomi, J.W., Gachu, S.M., Nderitu, J.H. and Olubayo, F.M. (2011) Effects of Intercropping Bulb Onion and Vegetables on Purple Blotch and Downy Mildew. Journal of Biological Sciences, 11, 52-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2011.52.57
[17] Peach, L., Benjamin, L.R. and Mead, A. (2000) Effects on the Growth of Carrots (Daucus carota L.), Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) and Onion (Allium cepa L.) of Restricting the Ability of the Plants to Intercept Resources. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 605-615.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.344.605
[18] Aerts, R., Boot, R.G.A. and van der Aart, P.J.M. (1991) The Relation between Above- and Below Ground Biomass Allocation Patterns and Competitive Ability. Oecologia, 87, 551-559.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00320419
[19] Tei, F., Scaife, A. and Aikman, D.P. (1996) Growth of Lettuce, Onion, and Red Beet. 1. Growth Analysis, Light Interception, and Radiation Use Efficiency. Annals of Botany, 78, 633-643.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0171
[20] Armas, C. and Pugnaire, F.I. (2011) Plant Neighbour Identity Matters to Below Ground Interactions under Controlled Conditions. PLoS One, 6, 1-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027791
[21] Kegge, W. and Pierik, R. (2009) Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds and Plant Competition. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 126-132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.007
[22] Amin, A.A., Rahad, El-Sh.M. and El-Abagy, H.M.H. (2007) Physiological Effect of Indole-3-Butyric Acid on Growth, Yield and Chemical Constituents of Onion Plants. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 1554-1563.
[23] Shrestha, H. (2013) A Plant Monograph of Onion (Allium cepa).
http://acepa.net76.net/Allium%20cepa.pdf

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.