Share This Article:

Urban Trends and Economic Development in China: Geography Matters!

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:2471KB) PP. 163-167
DOI: 10.4236/cus.2014.23016    3,165 Downloads   3,655 Views  

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to document the role of spatial effects in the relationship between urban trends and economic development in China, between 1984 and 2004. During this period the Chi-nese urban system experienced dramatic changes, with significant rural-urban, intra-provincial and interprovincial migration, mainly after the 1993 reforms that eased the former Hukou rule and abolished the prevailing cross-region labor mobility restrictions. This study draws upon recent econometrical tools based on spatial panel data models, developed in order to deliver evidence for a linear relationship between urbanization rates and GDP per capita and an inverted-U relationship between urban primacy and GDP per capita in the Chinese provinces.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Dimou, M. and Schaffar, A. (2014) Urban Trends and Economic Development in China: Geography Matters!. Current Urban Studies, 2, 163-167. doi: 10.4236/cus.2014.23016.

References

[1] Ades, A., & Glaeser, E. (1995). Trade and Circuses, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 195-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118515
[2] Catin, M., Hanchane, S., & Kamal, A. (2008). Urbanisation, primate et étapes de développement. Région et Développement, 27, 84-108.
[3] Chinese Statistical Office (CSO) (2004). Chinese Urban Statistical Yearbooks.
[4] Davis, J., & Henderson, V. (2003). Evidence of the Political Economy of the Urbanisation Process. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 98-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00504-1
[5] Debarsy, N., & Ertur, C. (2010). Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation in a Fixed Effects panel Data Model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 453-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.06.001
[6] Junius, K. (1999) Primacy and Economic Development: Bell Shaped or Parallel Growth of Cities? Journal of Economic Development, 24, 1-22.
[7] Krugman, P., & Livas, R. (1996). Trade Policy and the Third World Metropolis. Journal of Development Economics, 49, 137-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(95)00055-0
[8] MacKellar, F., & Vining, D. (1995). Population Concentration in Less Developed Countries. Papers in Regional Science, 74, 3-30.
[9] Moomaw, R., & Alwosabi, M. (2004). An Empirical Analysis of Competing Explanations of Urban Primacy. Annals of Regional Science, 38, 149-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-003-0137-x
[10] Rosen, K., & Resnick, M. (1980). The Size Distribution of Cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 8, 165-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90043-1
[11] United Nations (2009) World Urban Prospects. United Nations, New York.
[12] Wheaton, W., & Shishido, H. (1981). Urban Concentration, Agglomeration Economies and Economic Development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 30, 17-30.
[13] Williamson, A. (1965). Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4, 3-47.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.