Perception of Non-Law Students on the Combined Lecture- and Problem-Based Learning Approaches

J. K. L. Poon, Mimmy M. C. Kong

1Hong Kong Community College, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China 2Department of Management of Marketing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.25010                

Abstract

To fulfill the accreditation requirements of professional organizations, business law is commonly included in the business programs in higher education. However, business students, particularly at the sub-degree level, are often challenged to study law. The literature suggests that a combination of lecture-based learning (LBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) approaches can enhance
student learning and outcomes. This study evaluates the perceptions of accounting and business majors on the effectiveness of these combined teaching modes in studying business law. Survey data were collected from 262 respondents who enrolled and studied business law with this dual teaching mode during the academic year 2012–2013. Findings reveal that under this approach of learning, students are motivated and more engaged. They benefit from group dynamics, including collaborative and peer learning, social interaction, teamwork, task allocation, and confidence building. Overall, students are satisfied with this teaching mode.

Keywords

Problem Based Learning, Lecture Based Learning, Learning Law, Higher Education

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Ewang, F. (2008) Teaching Law to Accounting and Business Students: A Cumulative Dual Model. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 5. http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol5/iss2/3
[2]	Poon, J.K.L. (2013) Using Dual Model in Teaching Law to Business Students: A Research Agenda. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creative Education (CCE2013), Beijing, 24-26.
[3]	Tanner, E. (2010) Legal Language and the Non-Law Research Student. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 3, 77-86.
[4]	Kift, S. (2011) 21st Century Climate for Change: Curriculum Design for Quality Learning Engagement in Law. Legal Education Review, 19, 1-30.
[5]	Surry, D.W., Ensminger, D.C. and Haab, M. (2005) A Model for Integrating Instructional Technology into Higher Education. British Journal of Education Technology, 36, 327-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00461.x
[6]	Fitzgerald, S. (2011) The Challenge of Teaching Law Subjects with Large and Diverse Student Cohorts. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 1, 113-119.
[7]	Selby, J., Blazey, P. and Quilter, M. (2008) The Relevance of Multiple Choice Assessment in Large Cohort Business Law Units. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 1, 203-212.
[8]	Elliot, W. and Wolfe, A. (1981) The Need for Legal Education by Persons in Business, American. Business Law Journal, 19, 153-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.1981.tb01201.x
[9]	Siedel, G. (2000) Six Forces and the Legal Environment of Business: The Relative Value of Business Law among Business School Core Courses. American Business Law Journal, 37, 717-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00283.x
[10]	Weinstein, J. (1999) Coming of Age: Recognising the Importance of Interdisciplinary Education in Law Practice. Washington Law Review, 74, 319-330.
[11]	Boyce, G. (2004) Critical Accounting Education: Teaching and Learning outside the Circle. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 15, 565-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00047-9
[12]	Vida, A. (2007) A Critical Reflection on the Methodology of Teaching Law to Non-Law Students. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 4, 1360-1326. http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2007/issue4/allen4.html
[13]	Pepper, C. (2010) There’s a Lot of Learning Going on but NOT Much Teaching!: Student Perceptions of Problem-Based Learning in Science. Higher Education Research and Development, 29, 693-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501073
[14]	Phillips, R. and Baudains, C. (2002) Effectiveness of Web-Based Materials to Support Learning in Botany. International Conference on Computers in Education, New Zealand, 3-6 December.
[15]	Owens, A. and Wex, I. (2010) What Are the Challinges Involved and the Strategies Employed in Teaching Australian Law to Non-Law Students from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds and Cultures? CQ University International Education Research Centre, 89-97.
[16]	Teo, J.C.C. and Loi, S.L. (2003) Teaching Law to Business Undergraduates: The Singapore Experience. New Horizons in Education, 48, 45-50.
[17]	Boud, D. and Feletti, G.I. (1997) Changing Problem Based Learning. Introduction to the Second Edition. In: Boud, D. and Felleti, G.I., Eds., The Challenge of Problembase Learning, 2nd Edition, Kogan Page, London, 114.
[18]	Krathwohl, D.R. (2002) A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
[19]	Young, N.C. (1998) Problem-Based Learning: Using Cases to Drive the Learning Process. J Dental Education, 62, 235-241.
[20]	Douglas, S. (2012) Student Engagement, Problem Based Learning and Teaching Law to Business Students. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 6, 33-43.
[21]	Armstrong, S., Campbell, M. and Brogan, M. (2009) Interventions to Enhance the Student Experience of a First-Year Law Degree: What They Really Wanted. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 2, 135-148.