Share This Article:

Self-Contradictions from the Excessive Use of Natural Units

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:274KB) PP. 383-386
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2014.56049    3,395 Downloads   4,613 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The hypothesis c = h = G = 1 implies that unit mass is not a single-valued function but rather has two widely varying values, such as 7.4 × 10-51 kg and 4.0 × 1035 kg. Hence, the considerable body of work in theoretical physics that uses this common convention must be deemed suspect. In order to avoid this problem, theoreticians must limit themselves to c = h = 1 or, exclusively, c = G = 1 depending upon whether they are chiefly concerned with atomic physics or with gravity, respectively.

Cite this paper

Allen, A. (2014) Self-Contradictions from the Excessive Use of Natural Units. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 383-386. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.56049.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Baumann, D. and Green, D. (2011) Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2011. (IOP Journal)
[2] Li, M. and Wang, Y. (2010) Physics Letters B, 687, 243-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.042
[3] Longair, M.S. (2003) Planck and Natural Units. In: Theoretical Concepts in Physics: An Alternative View of Theoretical Reasoning in Physics, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, 336.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840173
[4] Perkins, D.H. (2000) Introduction to High Energy Physics. 4th Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809040
[5] Artru, X. and Rullhusen, P. (1998) Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 145, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00241-9
[6] Barton, G. (1990) Physics Letters B, 237, 559-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91224-Y
[7] Boffi, S., Giusti, C. and Pacati, F.D. (1979) Nuclear Physics A, 319, 461-476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(79)90526-8
[8] Kolbenstvedt, H. (1967) Journal of Applied Physics, 38, 4785-4787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1709220
[9] Tsyba, P.Y., Kulnazarov, I.I., Yerzhanov, K.K. and Myrzakulov, R. (2011) International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 50, 1876-1886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0703-4
[10] Corda, C. (2009) International Journal of Modern Physics D, 18, 2275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271809015904
[11] Kothawala, D., Sarkar, S. and Padmanabhan, T. (2007) Physics Letters B, 652, 338-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.07.021
[12] Mirza, B. and Zamaninasab, M. (2007) Journal of High Energy Physics, 2007. (IOP Journal)
[13] Witten, E. (1986) Physics and Geometry. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley, 3-11 August 1986.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.