Relativity Current Paradigm with Unresolved Anomalies


When a theory, as the general relativity, linked to special relativity, is foundation of a scientific paradigm, through normal science and academy, scientifics, professionals, professors, students and journals of that scientific community, the paradigm, it self-sustains and reproduces. Thus, the research is obligated and limited to apply the model existent of the paradigm to formulate problems and solve them, without searching new discoveries. This self-protection of the paradigm causes it to end its cycle of life, only after a long time, until that arise unresolved anomalies, some presents since origin, that they finally cause its change by other new paradigm. In this work, we study the most important anomalies that are part of the foundations of general relativity with the goal of promoting the call period of transition that is previous to scientific revolution. We use critical analysis method for rereading the general relativity, from the perspective of the history of science and philosophy of science. We find, the structural and complex anomaly of general relativity based on metaphysical spacetime that produces the metaphysics replaces physics. Also, two internal anomalies their direct consequences. These are: matter curves metaphysical spacetime, and metaphysical spacetime determines the geodesic motion of physical matter. We conclude that general relativity has no valid physical concept of spacetime, therefore of gravity. For these reasons, a new paradigm is needed.

Share and Cite:

Gomez, A. (2014) Relativity Current Paradigm with Unresolved Anomalies. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 364-374. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.56047.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bernath, U. and Vidal, M. (2007) The Theories and the Theorists: Why Theory Is Important for Research. Foundation for Research in Open and Distance Learning, Oldenburg.
[2] Kunt, T. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[3] Pajares, F. (2012) Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions: A Synopsis from the Original.
[4] Bachelard, G. (2010) La formación del espíritu científico. Contribución a un psicoanálisis del conocimiento objetivo. Siglo XXI, Buenos Aires.
[5] Jaoude, A.A. (2013) The Theory of Metarelativity: Beyond Albert Einstein’s Relativity, 97-109.
[6] Ashtekar, A. (2006) Space and Time: From Antiquity to Einstein and Beyond, 1-10.
[7] Bass, A. (2002) Consolidacion de un paradigma de la fisica.
[8] Guillen, A.L. (2013) Gravity, Metaphysics or Physics? 68-74.
[9] Messiah, A. (1981) Quantum Mechanics 2. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 875.
[10] Hawking, S. (2001) A Brief History of Time.
[11] Newton, I. (1846) Newton’s Principia: The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Tr, Motte’s A. Ed Daniel Adee, New York.
[12] Aristotle (1930) Physics. Books III, V, VII. Tr Hardie R.P. and Gaye. Works of Aristotle v. 2, R.K. W.D. Ross, ed, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
[13] Guillen, A.L. (2013) International Fundamental Journal of Physical Sciences, 50-53.
[14] Ross, S.W. (1990) Non-Euclidean Geometry. PHD Thesis, University of Maine, Maine.
[15] Guillen, A.L. (2006) Gravedad si es una fuerza.
[16] Petkov, V. (2012) Can Gravity Be Quantized?
[17] Pokorny, P. (2012) Geodesics Revisited: Chaotic Modeling and Simulation.
[18] Malament, D. (2009) On the Status of the Geodesic Principle in General Relativity.
[19] Gassmann, C. (2013) La ruptura epistemológica según Bachelard, Althusser y Badiou, 34-52.
[20] Balibar, é. (2004) El concepto de “corte epistemológico” de Gaston Bachelard a Louis Althusser, en escritos por Althusser, Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
[21] Althusser, L. (1967) La revolución teórica de Marx. Tr. Martha Harnecker. Siglo XXI, México.
[22] Gromov, M. (1994) Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano, 61, 9-123.
[23] Norton, J. (1993) Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, 791-858.
[24] Einstein, A. (1920) Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
[25] Minkowski, H. (2012) Space and Time Minkowski’s Papers on Relativity. In: Petkov, V., Ed., Minkowski Institute Press, Moscu.
[26] Einstein, A. (1997) The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity.
[27] Odenwald, S. (2009) Spacetime: Gravity. In: Haisch, B. and Lindblom, J.F., Eds., Universe Foundation, Redwood.
[28] Dalton, K. (1997) Gravity, Geometry, and Equivalence. 1-3.
[29] Wheeler, J. (1990) A Journey into Gravity and Spacetime. W. H. Freeman, Scientific American Library, San Francisco.
[30] Grant, S. (2013) The Metaphysics of Spacetime Substantivalism: A Methodological Study of the Structure of Spacetime in the Context of General Relativity. PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin.
[31] Einstein, A. (1922) The Meaning of Relativity.
[32] Logunov, A. and Mestvirishvili, M. (1989) The Relativistic Theory of Gravitation. Mir Publisher, Moscow.
[33] Van Flandern, T. (2004) Does Gravity Have Inertia?

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.