Self-Affirmation Buffers Claimed Self-Handicapping? A Test of Contextual and Individual Moderators


Researchers have argued that the strategies individuals use for self-esteem regulation are interchangeable. In the present study, we examined whether previous self-affirmation reduces the amount of subsequent claimed self-handicapping. More importantly, we tested potential moderators of these effects. Following negative feedback on an intelligence test, 56 female college students were given the opportunity to affirm themselves either within the threatened intelligence domain or within a domain unrelated to the source of threat (e.g., musicality). Results revealed that subjects handicapped less when they had previously affirmed themselves in a domain which was unrelated to the threatening domain (contextual moderator). However, these effects were moderated by dispositional self-esteem (individual moderator). High self-esteem participants claimed fewer handicaps the more they felt self-affirmed whereas claimed self-handicapping among low self-esteem participants was not affected by previous self-affirmation. Altogether, our findings suggest certain limitations on the substitutability of self-protection processes.

Share and Cite:

Tandler, S. , Schwinger, M. , Kaminski, K. & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2014). Self-Affirmation Buffers Claimed Self-Handicapping? A Test of Contextual and Individual Moderators. Psychology, 5, 321-327. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.55042.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
[2] Aronson, J., Blanton, H., & Cooper, J. (1995). From Dissonance to Disidentification: Selectivity in the Self-Affirmation Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 986-996.
[3] Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000). When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1151-1164.
[4] Ferring, D., & Filipp, S.-H. (1996). Messung des Selbstwertgefühls: Befunde zu Reliabilitat, Validitat und Stabilitat der Rosenberg-Skala. Diagnostica, 42, 284-292.
[5] Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
[6] McCrea, S. M., & Hirt, E. R. (2011). Limitations on the Substitutability of Self-Protection Processes: Self-Handicapping Is Not Reduced by Related-Domain Self-Affirmations. Social Psychology, 42, 9-18.
[7] Shepperd, J., & Arkin, R. M. (1989). Determinants of Self-Handicapping: Task Importance and Effects of Pre-Existing Handicaps on Self-Generated Handicaps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 101-112.
[8] Siegel, P. A., Scillitoe, J., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2005). Reducing the Tendency to Self-Handicap: The Effect of Self-Affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 589-597.
[9] Steele, C. M. (1988). The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 21 (pp. 261-302). New York: Academic Press.
[10] Stone, J., & Cooper, J. (2001). A Self-Standards Model of Cognitive Dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 228-243.
[11] Stone, J., & Cooper, J. (2003). The Effect of Self-Attribute Relevance on How Self-Esteem Moderates Attitude Change in Dissonance Processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 508-515.
[12] Stone, J., Wiegand, A. W., Cooper, J., & Aronson, E. (1997). When Exemplification Fails: Hypocrisy and the Motive for Self-Integrity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 54-65.
[13] Tesser, A., Crepaz, N., Collins, J. C., Cornell, D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Confluence of Self-Esteem Regulation Mechanisms: On Integrating the Self-Zoo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1476-1489.
[14] Zuckerman, M., & Tsai, F.-F. (2005). Costs of Self-Handicapping. Journal of Personality, 73, 411-442.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.