Share This Article:

Newspaper Reports on BSE around the Time of the Japan-US Trade Conflicts: Content Analysis of Japanese and US Dailies from 2002 to 2006

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:517KB) PP. 20-34
DOI: 10.4236/ajc.2014.21003    3,997 Downloads   6,134 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Mass media can affect how people understand and react to particular health risks. Reporting of health risks during the international trade disputes, resulting from the difference in safety regulations, therefore can play a pivotal role in resolving them. This study compared the newspaper reports on BSE-related events in major national dailies between Japan and the US around the period when BSE-infected cattle were discovered in the US and the import of US beef products was banned (between December 2002 and November 2006). During the study period, the number of BSE-related newspaper articles increased in both the US and Japan, but the visibility of the issue was more prominent and persistent in Japan than in the US. Geographically, most of the articles had a domestic focus, but they also reported the news of each trade partner. After the discovery of BSE cattle in the US, articles of commerce and trade issues were dominant in Japan, while the incidence of BSE, agriculture, and trade dominated in the US. Overall, the US-based newspapers carried more advocacy articles than the Japanese ones. In Japan, calls for stronger domestic policy decreased, but those for stronger foreign policy increased slightly. Meanwhile, in the US, calls for a stronger domestic policy increased slightly whereas those for weaker foreign policy dropped-both only temporarily. The major rationale for policy advocacy was the economy and health in both Japan and the US. However, the balance of competing policy objectives and the rational acceptance of BSE risks were argued more in the US papers than in the Japanese ones. In conclusion, during the BSE-related dispute on health and trade, the visibility and faces of the issues in newspapers differed between Japan and the US. Acceptance of BSE-related risks was argued differently, and those differences reflected and affected the public's perception of BSE issues, the related safety policies by the governments, and the configuration of social interests in each country. The differences evident in the media could serve as a vehicle for reappraising the existing policies as well as the possible international harmonization of risk management policies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Sato, H. and Campbell, R. (2014) Newspaper Reports on BSE around the Time of the Japan-US Trade Conflicts: Content Analysis of Japanese and US Dailies from 2002 to 2006. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 2, 20-34. doi: 10.4236/ajc.2014.21003.

References

[1] Abbassi, K. (1998). Headlines: More Perilous than Pills? British Medical Journal, 316, 82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7124.82
[2] Anders, S. M., & Caswell, J. A. (2009). Standards as Barriers versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on US Seafood Imports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 310-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01239.x
[3] Boyd, A. D., Jardine, C. G., & Driedger, S. M. (2009). Canadian Media Representations of Mad Cow Disease. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 72, 1096-1105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287390903084629
[4] Brookes, R. (1999). Newspapers and National Identity: The BSE/CJD Crisis and the British Press. Media, Culture and Society, 21, 247-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344399021002007
[5] Budne, S., & Krauss, E. S. (1995). Newspaper Coverage of US-Japan Frictions: Balance and Objectivity. Asian Survey, 35, 336-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2645799
[6] Burgess, A. (2010). Media Risk Campaigning in the UK: From Mobile Phones to Baby P. Journal of Risk Research, 13, 59-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870903136035
[7] Campbell, R. G., & Sato, H. (2009). Examination of a Global Prohibition Regime: A Comparative Study of Japanese and US Newspapers on the Issue of Tobacco Regulation. The International Communication Gazette, 71, 161-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748048508100911
[8] Campbell, R., & Sato, H. (2010). Policy and Politics of BSE in the United States. In H. Sato (Ed.), Management of Health Risks from Environment and Food: Policy and Politics of Health Risk Management in Five Countries-Asbestos and BSE (pp. 317-338). Netherlands: Springer.
[9] Carducci, A., Alfani, S., Sassi, M., Cinini, A., & Calamusa, A. (2011). Mass Media Health Information: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Daily Press Coverage and Its Relation with Public Perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling, 82, 475-478.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748048508100911
[10] Chang, T. K., Shoemaker, P. J., & Brendlinger, N. (1987). Determinants of International News Coverage in the US Media. Communication Research, 14, 396-414.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365087014004002
[11] Chapman, S., & Lupton, D. (1994). The Fight for Public Health: Principles and Practice of Media Advocacy. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
[12] Coleman, R., & McCombs, M. (2007). The Young and Agenda-Less? Exploring Age-Related Differences in Agenda Setting on the Youngest Generation, Baby Boomers, and the Civic Generation. Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly, 84, 495-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400306
[13] Cotte, S., & Ulrich, B. (1998). Risk Society and the Media. European Journal of Communication, 13, 5-32.
[14] Davidson, D. J., & Bogdan, E. (2010). Reflexive Modernization at the Source: Local Media Coverage of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in Rural Alberta. Canadian Review of Sociology, 47, 359-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2010.01242.x
[15] Dery, D. (2000). Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies, 21, 37-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014428700114008
[16] Dimitrova, D. V., & Stroembaeck, J. (2005). Mission Accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the Elite Newspapers in Sweden and the United States. Gazette, 67, 399-417.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0016549205056050
[17] Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[18] Edelman, P. (1988). Japanese Product Standards as Non-Tariff Trade Barriers: When Regulatory Policy Becomes a Trade Issue. Stanford Journal of International Law, 24, 389-446.
[19] Eldridge, J., & Reilly, J. (2003). Risk and Relativity: BSE and the British Media. In N. Pidgeon, R. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The Social Amplification of Risk (pp. 138-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461.007
[20] Feindt, P. H., & Kleinschmit, D. (2011). The BSE Crisis in German Newspapers: Reframing Responsibility. Science as Culture, 20, 183-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.563569
[21] Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[22] Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2003). International Elections on the US Network News: An Examination of Factors Affecting Newsworthiness. Gazette, 65, 25, 40.
[23] Goldsworthy, S. (2006). English Nonconformity and the Pioneering of the Modern Newspaper Campaign. Journalism Studies, 7, 387-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700600680690
[24] Goodel, R. (1987). The Role of Mass Media in Scientific Controversy. In T. Englehardt, & A. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology (pp. 585-598). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719.028
[25] Hagen, I. (1997). Communicating to an Ideal Audience: News and the Notion of the Informed Citizen. Political Communication, 14, 405-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846097199209
[26] Hendrix, J. A., & Hayes, D. C. (2007). Emergency Public Relations Cases: Protecting Consumer Confidence in US Beef: A Success Story. In J. A. Hendrix, & D. C. Hayes (Eds.), Public Relations Cases: Seventh Edition (pp. 378-386). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
[27] Leiss, W., & Nicol, A. N. (2006). A Tale of Two Food Risks: BSE and Farmed Salmon in Canada. Journal of Risk Research, 9, 891-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870600924584
[28] Kepplinger, H. M. (2002). Mediatization of Politics: Theory and Data. Journal of Communication, 52, 972-986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02584.x
[29] Kim, S., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think About it This Way: Attribute Agenda-Setting Function of the Press and the Public’s Evaluation of a Local Issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900102
[30] Kleinschmit, D., & Krott, M. (2008). The Media in Forestry: Government, Governance and Social Visibility. In T. Sikor (Ed.), Public and Private in Natural Resource Governance: A False Dichotomy (pp. 127-141). London: Earthscan.
[31] Lewis, R. E., & Tyshenko, M. G. (2009). The Impact of Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk and the Public Reaction to Mad Cow Disease in Canada. Risk Analysis, 29, 714-728.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01188.x
[32] Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[33] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage.
[34] Miller, D. (1999). Risk, Science and Policy: Definitional Struggles, Information Management, the Media and BSE. Social Science and Medicine, 29, 1239-1255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00163-X
[35] Nestle, M. (2003). Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[36] Obara, K., McConnell, M., & Dyck, J. (2010). Japan’s Beef Market: A Report from the Economic Research Service. LDP-M-194-01. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
[37] R-CALF USA (2005). http://www.r-calfusa.com/BSE/050201-PositionBriefonSRMs.pdf
[38] Reese, S. D. (1991). Setting the Media’s Agenda: A Power Balance Perspective. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 14 (pp. 309-340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[39] Richardson, J. (2006). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
[40] Roberts, D., & Unnevehr, L. (2005). Resolving Trade Disputes Arising from Trends in Food Safety Regulation: The Role of the Multilateral Governance Framework. World Trade Review, 4, 469-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474745605002466
[41] Rowe, G., Frewer, L., & Sjoberg, L. (2000). Newspaper Reporting of Hazards in the UK and Sweden. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 59-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/304
[42] Sandman, P. M. (1999). Responding to Community Outrage: Strategies for Effective Risk Communication. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
[43] Sato, H. (2003). Agenda Setting for Smoking Control in Japan, 1945-1990: Influence of the Mass Media on National Health Policy Making. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 23-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730305731
[44] Sato, H. (2010). Policy and Politics of BSE-Related Human Disease Prevention in Japan: In Pursuit of Food Safety and Public Reassurance. In H. Sato (Ed.), Management of Health Risks from Environment and Food: Policy and Politics of Health Risk Management in Five Countries-Asbestos and BSE (pp. 183-220). Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3028-3
[45] Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
[46] Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the Message (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
[47] Short, J. F. (1984). The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis. American Sociological Review, 49, 711-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095526
[48] Smith, K. C., Terry-McElrath, Y., Wakefield, M., & Durrant, R. (2005). Media Advocacy and Newspaper Coverage of Tobacco Issues: A Comparative Analysis of 1 Year’s Print News in the United States and Australia. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 7, 289-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14622200500056291
[49] Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy Paradox and Political Reason. New York: Harper Collins.
[50] Tourangeau, R., & Rainiski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
[51] Treiman, D. J. (2009). Quantitative Data Analysis: Doing Social Research to Test Ideas. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[52] Tuchman, G. (1978). Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
[53] US International Trade Commission. (2008). Global Beef Trade: Effects of Animal Health, Sanitary, Food Safety, and other Measures on US Beef Exports. Investigation 332-488, USITC Publication 4033, Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.
[54] Vogel, D. (1992). Consumer Protection and Protectionalism in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies, 18, 119-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/132709
[55] Wallack, L., & Dorfman, L. (1996). Media Advocacy: A Strategy for Advancing Policy and Promoting Health. Health Education Quarterly, 23, 293-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109019819602300303
[56] Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., & Themba, M. (1993). Media Advocacy and Public Health: Power for Prevention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[57] Washer, P. (2005). Representations of Mad Cow Disease. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 457-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.001
[58] Wansink, B. (2004). Consumer Reactions to Food Safety Crisis. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 48, 103-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(04)48002-4
[59] Watts, J. (2001). Japan’s Government Tries to Allay BSE Fears. The Lancet, 358, 2057.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07150-1
[60] Zhang, C., & Meadows, C. W. (2012). International Coverage, Foreign Policy, and National Image: Exploring the Complexities of Media Coverage, Public Opinion, and Presidential Agenda. International Journal of Communication, 6, 76-95.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.