A Validated Questionnaire for Quantifying Skin Oiliness

Leslie S. Baumann, Randall D. Penfield, Jennifer L. Clarke, Deysi K. Duque

Department of Clinical Research, Baumann Cosmetic & Research Institute, Miami, USA.
Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
University of Miami Cosmetic Medicine and Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami Beach, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2014.42012                

Abstract

Increased sebum production is a common skin complaint and plays an important role in acne and oily scalp conditions. To choose the correct skin care products, which mostly are marketed for dry, oily or normal skin, the consumer must self-assess their skin type. Studies show that individuals incorrectly self-assess their sebum secretion levels. In order to be able to correctly determine skin oiliness, we have developed a six-item skin oiliness scale (SOS) that correlates with sebumeter measurements. The resulting correlation was 0.54, which was significantly different from zero (p < 0.01). This result indicates a strong relationship between the SOS scores and the associated sebumeter measurements. This is easy to administer questionnaire to accurately determine skin oiliness and can be useful in screening and recruiting patients for research trials, performing outcome research, and recommending skin care products and procedures. Our study shows that this skin oiliness scale is an accurate way to identify and quantify skin oiliness.

Keywords

Skin Oiliness Scale; Oily Facial Skin; Skin Oiliness Quantification; Measuring Skin Oiliness

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Kim, M.K., Choi, S.Y., Byun, H.J., Huh, C.H., Park, K.C., Patel, R.A., Shinn, A.H. and Youn, S.W. (2006) Comparison of Sebum Secretion, Skin Type, ph in Humans with and without Acne. Archives of Dermatologic Research, 298, 113-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-006-0666-0
[2]	Youn, S.W., Kim, S.J., Hwang, I.A. and Park, K.C. (2002) Evaluation of Facial Skin Type by Sebum Secretion: Discrepancies between Subjective Descriptions and Sebum Secretion. Skin Research and Technology, 8, 168-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.10320.x
[3]	Youn, S.W., Na, J.I., Choi, S.Y., Huh, C.H. and Park, K.C. (2005) Regional and Seasonal Variations in Facial Sebum Secretions: A Proposal for the Definition of Combination Skin Type. Skin Research and Technology, 11, 189-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00119.x
[4]	Baumann, L. (2005) The Skin Type Solution. Bantam Dell, New York, 337.
[5]	Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986) Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Harcourt, New York, 527.
[6]	Osterlind, S.J. (2006) Modern Measurement: Theory, Principles, and Applications of Mental Appraisal. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, 492.
[7]	Masters, G.N. (1982) A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272
[8]	Bond, T.G. and Fox, C.M. (2001) Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, 255.
[9]	Ebretson, S.E. and Reise, S.P. (2000) Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Erlbaum, Mahwah, 371.
[10]	Linacre, J.M. (2005) A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS/MINISTEP Rasch-Model Computer Programs (Version 3.55). MESA Press, Chicago, 286.
[11]	Segot-Chicq, E., Compan-Zaouati, D., Wolkenstein, P., Consoli, S., Rodary, C., Delvigne, V., Guillou, V. and Poli, F. (2007) Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Evaluate How a Cosmetic Product for Oily Skin Is Able to Improve Well-Being in Women. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 9, 1181-1186. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gob/pubmed/17894702