Share This Article:

Integrating the Spiritual-Cultural, Rights-Responsibilities, and Economics of a Citizenship Development Higher Learning through a Differently Conceived and Practiced Sociology in (Second Language) English in the Japanese University

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:85KB) PP. 75-82
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.412A2011    3,791 Downloads   4,922 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

School classroom life and study can be thought of as a threefold social sphere which encompasses the economic, the rights-responsibilities, and the spiritual-cultural. In order that there be a healthy threefold social sphere in the classroom, all three intertwined sub-spheres must be equally developed and work together. Human development and the instilling of socially beneficial values in young people are the publicly stated goals of Japanese education at all levels in Japan. Language of wider use and communication (LWUC) English medium study integrated with and directed by content study in a one-world ontology of knowing and communicating, has an important role to play in the implementation of this goal. However, to do so requires the creation and nurturing of an intersubjective well-being class study framework that can serve as an ongoing resource to create opportunities for civic dispositions to be learned and relearned. A study framework is required that prioritizes 1) people over technology; 2) progress over status quo arrangements; 3) the valuing of study over operational or epistemic outcomes; and 4) a process co-constructed and evolving curriculum over a closed already decided and other-directed curriculum and syllabus. This study framework will contribute to enhancing individual and communal awareness of participants’ civic responsibility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Brady, A. (2013) Integrating the Spiritual-Cultural, Rights-Responsibilities, and Economics of a Citizenship Development Higher Learning through a Differently Conceived and Practiced Sociology in (Second Language) English in the Japanese University. Creative Education, 4, 75-82. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.412A2011.

References

[1] Abe, H., Perrin, K., & Woolbright, D. (1995) The evolving of a curriculum. ON JALT’95, Proceedings of the 1995 JALT (Japan Association of LanguageTeachers) Conference, 26-29.
[2] Andrewes, S. (2005). Towards a post-communicative approach? Life beyond CLT. Modern English Teacher, 7, 4-9.
[3] Banks, J. (1991). A curriculum for empowerment, action, and change. In C. Sleeter (Ed.), Empowerment through multicultiral education (pp. 125-142). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
[4] Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Oxford: Polity Press
[5] Barnes, B. (2000). Understanding agency: Social theory and responsible action. London: Sage Publication.
[6] Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
[7] Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
[8] Bisong, J. (1995). Language choice and cultural imperialism: A Nigerian Perspective. ELT Journal, 49, 122-132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.2.122
[9] Blanton, L. (1992) A holistic approach to college ESL: Integrating language and content. ELT Journal, 46, 185-193.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.3.285
[10] Bollinger, C., Nainby, K., & Warren, J. (2003). Articulating contact in the classroom: Towards a constitutive focus in critical pedagogy. Language and Intercultural Communication, 3, 198-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14708470308668105
[11] Brady, A. (1997). English as an additional language (EAL): Language policy and planning at university for non-language majors. Kwansei Gakuin Sociology Department Studies, 77, 85-122.
[12] Brady, A., & Shinohara, Y. (2000). Principles and activities for a transcultural approach to additional language learning. System, 28, 305322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00014-2
[13] Christiansen, C. R., Garvin, D. A., & Sweet, A. (1991). Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[14] Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503
[15] Forbes, S. H. (2005). On socially responsible education.
http://www.putnampit.com/educate.html
[16] Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.
[17] Giroux, H. (1992-93). Border crossings: Cultural WOrkers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge Press.
[18] Greene, M. (1993c). The passions of lpuralism, muticulturalism and community. Educational Researcher, 22, 13-18.
[19] Hallet, W. (1999). Ein didaktisches modell fur den bilingualen Sachfachunterricht. The bilingual triangle. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen, I, 52, 23-27.
[20] Horio, T. (1995) Educational thought and ideology in Japan: State authority and intellectual freedom. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
[21] Imamura, S. (1978). Criticism on TEFL (Teaching English as a foreign language) in Japan. In Koike et al. (Eds.), The teaching of English in Japan (pp. 15-22). Tokyo: Eichosha Press.
[22] Johnson, A. G. (1997). The forest and the trees: Sociology as life, practice, promise. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
[23] King, A. (2007). The sociology of sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37, 501-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307665
[24] Lamb, G. (2008). The threefold nature of social life. Biodynamics, 39-44.
[25] Lange, D. (1994). The curricular crisis in foreign language learning. ADFL Bulletin, 25, 12-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/adfl.25.2.12
[26] Littlejohn, A. (2004). Language teaching for the future.
http://www3telus.net/linguisticissues/language teaching.html
[27] Mark, K. (1990). A language teaching model for the 21st century. The Language Teacher, 14, 11-16.
[28] McKinney, K. (2007). The student voice: Sociology majors tell us about learning sociology. Teaching Sociology, 35, 112-124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0703500201
[29] McVeigh, B. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Press.
[30] Murphy, J. M. (1996). Integrating listening and reading instruction in EAP (English for Academic Purposes) Programs. English for Specific Purposes (ESP), 15, 105-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(96)00019-1
[31] Prodroumou, L. (1992). English as cultural action. ELT Journal, 42, 7383.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.2.73
[32] Refsing, K. (1992). Japanese educational expansion: Quality or equality? In R. Goodman, & K. Refsing (Eds.), Ideology and practice in modern Japan (pp. 116-129). New York: Routledge Press.
[33] Sandelands, L. (2003). Thinking about social life. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.
[34] Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
[35] Splitter, L. (1995). On the theme of “teaching for higher order skills”.
http://www.Shss.Montclair.edu/inquiry/ Summ95/splitter.html
[36] Stewart, J. (1995). Language as articulate contact: Toward a postsemiotic philosophy of communication. Albany: SUNY Press.
[37] Suzuki, Y. (1978). The importance of educational philosophy. In Koike et al. (Eds.), The teaching of English in Japan (pp. 71-90). Tokyo: Eichosha Press.
[38] Tanabe, Y. (1978). Engish as an international language: Qualification, adaptation, and perspective. In Koike et al. (Eds.), The teaching of English in Japan (pp. 47-57). Tokyo: Eichosha.
[39] Time for Rights, Unicef and Save the Children (2002). Learning about child rights and responsibilities.
http://www.unicef.org.nz/store/doc/1_RightsActivities.pdf

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.