Sustainable Urban Habitats and Urban Water Supply: Accounting for Unaccounted for Water in Bangalore City, India

Krishna Raj

Centre for Economic studies and Policy, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, India.

DOI: 10.4236/cus.2013.14017                

Abstract

The demand for urban water supply service is increasing rapidly as globalisation accelerates economic development and brings improvements in living standards in India with the interactive effects of demographic growth and influx of migrants into cities due to push and pull factors. Provision of reliable and safe water supply to urban habitat is an essential input for overall economic and social advancement. However, urban local bodies mandated to perform this task in India have been experiencing constant budgetary bottlenecks in mobilizing resources to meet the water consumption targets of the present as well as future population. Urban water supply sector in India and particularly the study area Bangalore is facing a number of challenges and constraints in meeting one of the important components of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), i.e., to ensure supply of adequate potable water to half the number of people who are currently living without access to sustainable, safe drinking water sources by 2015. These problems and constraints include increasing scarcity of water, low pricing, high subsidy, poor cost recovery, high transmission and distribution (T & D) losses, due to poor maintenance, rising unaccounted-for (UFW) and non-revenue water outgo (NRW). Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) is experiencing poor cost recovery and has been unable to generate enough revenue to meet the investment requirements of the growing water needs of the city. BWSSB is also facing serious performance gaps such as reliability, financial sustainability, environmental sustainability and affordability due to deterioration of infrastructure.

Keywords

Urbanisation; Water Supply; Unaccounted for Water; Non-Revenue Water; Demand; Management

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) (2006-2007). Annual Performance Report.
[2]	Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) (2006). Handbook of Statistics.
[3]	Batten, D. F. (2007). Can economists value water’s multiple benefits? Water Policy, 9, 345-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2007.020
[4]	Biswas, A. K. (2008). Water management in India in 2020 and beyond. New Delhi: Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute.
[5]	Central Public Health & Environmental Engineering Organization, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India. http://cpheeo.nic.in
[6]	Nanjundaiah, C. (2010). Water supply and Sanitation, State of Environment Report for Bangalore, published by Department of ecology and environment, Government of Karnataka. http://parisaramahiti.kar.nic.in/soerbangalore2008.html
[7]	Niemczynowicz, J. (1996). Megacities from a water perspective. Water International, 21, 198-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508069608686515
[8]	Reddy, R. V. (1999). Quenching the thirst: The cost of water in fragile environments. Development and Change, 30, pp. 89-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00108
[9]	Saleth, R. M., & Sastry, G. S. (2004). Water supply and sanitation sector of Karnataka, India: status, performance and change. Water Policy, 6, 161-183.
[10]	United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) (2003). Water and sanitation in the world’s cities: Local actions for global goals. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
[11]	World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (2000). Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment Report. WHO.
[12]	Zerah, M. H. (2000). Water: unreliable supply in Delhi. Delhi: Manohar Publishers.
[13]	Oliver, A. (2010). Water Tariff and Consumption Drop: An Evaluation of households’ response to a water tariff increase in Manaus, Brazil. Water Policy, 12, 564-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.045