Explaining the “Buy One Get One Free” Promotion: The Golden Ratio as a Marketing Tool

DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2013.38075   PDF   HTML     6,031 Downloads   10,776 Views   Citations


Buy-one-get-one-free (BOGOF) promotions are a common feature of retail food markets, but why are they so widespread? The theory of Relative Utility Pricing (RUP) developed in this paper provides an explanation not only for supermarket promotional offers but also for more general pricing of packs of different sizes in supermarkets and on the internet. A clear and simple explanation is given for the two most widely used quantity promotions: BOGOF and 3-for-the-price-of-2. The RUP model may be linked to the theory of iso-elastic utility functions, and this allows the relationships amongst risk-aversion, pack-size ratio and demand elasticity to be explored. “Cautious consumers”, as defined in the paper, are found to be the only sensible target for quantity promotions. It is argued that the needs of cautious consumers of retail commodities will be best addressed if the vendor sets the ratio of successive pack sizes as the square of the Golden Ratio, namely 2.62, and the price-ratio at the Golden Ratio, 1.62. Thus the Golden Ratio may be regarded as a marketing guide for vendors considering both their best interests and those of their customers. This proposition is supported by an analysis showing that higher profits are more likely to come from Golden Ratio sizing than from either BOGOF or 3-for-2 when variable costs lie in most of the upper half of the range that is required for any of these multibuy offers to generate profit. The paper’s theoretical predictions for both pack sizes and prices are supported by examples from the retail sector: grocery, paperback books and electronics.

Share and Cite:

P. Thomas and A. Chrystal, "Explaining the “Buy One Get One Free” Promotion: The Golden Ratio as a Marketing Tool," American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 3 No. 8, 2013, pp. 655-673. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2013.38075.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] H. Wallop, “Buy-One-Get-One-Free Offers Are One of the Most Effective Marketing Tools in the Supermarket Industry,” 2008.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk /news/uknews/2263645/ Food-waste-Why-supermarkets- will-never-say-bogof-to- buy-one-get-one-free.html
[2] T. Evans, “The End of Buy One Get One Free? Government Considers Plans to Scrap Multibuy Deals to Tackle Obesity,” This is Money.co.uk, 2013 .
http:// www.thisismoney. co.uk/ money/news/article-2354583/ The-end-buy-one-free- Government-consider s-plans-scrap- multibuy-deals-tackle- obesity.html
[3] J. Koten, “Why Do Hot Dogs Come in Packs of 10 and Buns in 8s or 12s?” Wall Street Journal (Western Edition), 1984, p. 1.
[4] E. Gerstner and J. D. Hess, “Why Do Hot Dogs Come in Packs of 10 and Buns in 8s or 12s? A Demand-Side Investigation,” The Journal of Business, Vol. 60, No. 4, 1987, pp. 491-517. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/296410
[5] A. Tabarrok, “Buy One Get One Free,” 2004.
http://www. marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution /2004/03/ buy_one_get_one.html
[6] M. W. Pressler, “Something Racy in the Male. Spilling Victoria’s Secret, and Other Reader Correspondence,” Washington Post, 2004, p. F05.
[7] T. Harford, “The Undercover Economist,” Abacus, London, 2011.
[8] P. W. Dobson and E. Gerstner, “For a Few Cents More: Why Supersize Unhealthy Food,” Marketing Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2010, pp. 770-778.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ mksc.1100.0558
[9] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, pp. 263-291.
[10] R. H. Thaler, “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1985, pp. 199-214. Republished 2008 in Marketing Science, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1985, pp. 15-25.
[11] P. Thomas and A. Chrystal, “Generalized Demand Densities for Retail Price Investigation,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2013, pp. 279-294. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4236 /ajibm.2013.33034
[12] P. Thomas and A. Chrystal, “Retail Price Optimization from Sparse Demand Data,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2013, pp. 295-306. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4236/ajibm.2013.33035
[13] P. Thomas and A. Chrystal, “Using Relative Utility Pricing to Explain Prices in Supermarkets and on the Internet,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, in Press.
[14] R. G. Lipsey and K. A. Chrystal, “An Introduction to Positive Economics,” 8th Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
[15] Amazon.co.uk, 2009
http://www.Amazon.co.uk/tag/usb%20memory%20stick/ products/ref=tag_tdp_sv_istp#page=2:sort= relevant
[16] Mysupermarket.co.uk, 2009.
http://www.mysupermarket.co.uk /Shopping/ FindProducts.aspx?Query=Eggs
[17] J. W. Pratt, “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large,” Econometrica, Vol. 32, No. 1-2, 1964, pp. 122-136.
[18] K. J. Arrow, “Social Choice and Individual Values,” John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1951.
[19] P. J. Thomas, “An Absolute Scale for Measuring the Utility of Money,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 250, No. 1, 2010, Article ID: 012045.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088 /1742-6596/250/1/012045
[20] H. M. Treasury, “Green Book,” 2009.
[21] T. Crilly, “50 Mathematical Ideas You Really Need to Know,” Quercus, London, 2008.
[22] P. J. Thomas, R. D. Jones and W. J. O. Boyle, “The Limits to Risk Aversion. Part 2: The Permission Point and Examples,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 88, No. 6, 2010, pp. 396-406.
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.psep.2010.07.001
[23] G. E. Moore, “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits,” Electronics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 1965, pp. 114-117. Reprinted Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 86, No. 1, 1998, pp. 82-85.
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Moore%27s_law

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.