Comparison of the Motion Accuracy of a Six Degrees of Freedom Radiotherapy Couch with and without Weights


In this study, we compared the motion accuracy of six degrees of freedom (6D) couch for precision radiotherapy with or without weights attached to the couch. Two digital cameras were focused on the iso-center of a linear accelerator. Images of a needle which had been fixed to the 6D couch were obtained using the cameras when the couch moved in translation and rotation around each axis. The three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of the needle were calculated from coordinate values in the images. A coordinate error of the needle position relative to the theoretical position was calculated. The errors were obtained with or without a 60 kg weight attached to the 6D couch, and these errors were compared with each other. The mean distance of the 3D error vectors for the weighted test was 0.21 ± 0.11 mm, and >0.16 ± 0.09 mm for the non-weighted test (p < 0.05). However, the difference of two values was 0.06 mm which is smaller than the minimum distance the 6D couch system can correctly move. The variance of 0.16 mm for the Y coordinate errors for the weighted test only was larger than that for the non-weighted test, which was 0.06 mm (p < 0.05). We found that a total weight of 60 kg did not affect the accuracy of the 6D couch clinically. However, the variance of the Y coordinate errors was increased. This might suggest that the addition of this weight increased the uncertainty of the motion of the 6D couch.

Share and Cite:

A. Takemura, S. Ueda, K. Noto, H. Kojima and N. Isomura, "Comparison of the Motion Accuracy of a Six Degrees of Freedom Radiotherapy Couch with and without Weights," International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2013, pp. 69-75. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2013.23010.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. Rahimian, J. C. Chen, A. A. Rao, M. R. Girvigian, M. J. Miller and H. E. Greathouse, “Geometrical Accuracy of the Novalis Stereotactic Radiosurgery System for Trigeminal Neuralgia,” Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 101, Supplement 3, 2004, pp. 351-355.
[2] J. Y. Jin, F. F. Yin, S. E. Tenn, P. M. Medin and T. D. Solberg, “Use of the BrainLAB ExacTrac X-Ray 6D System in Image-Guided Radiotherapy,” Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2008, pp. 124-134. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2008.02.005
[3] J. Ma, Z. Chang, Z. Wang, W. Q. Jackie, J. P. Kirkpatrick and F. F. Yin, “ExacTrac X-Ray 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image-Guidance for Intracranial Non-Invasive Stereotactic Radiotherapy: Comparison with Kilo-Voltage Cone-Beam CT,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2009, pp. 602-608. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.009
[4] T. Takakura, T. Mizowaki, M. Nakata, S. Yano, T. Fujimoto, Y. Miyabe, M. Nakamura and M. Hiraoka, “The Geometric Accuracy of Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using a 6D Robotic Couch System,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/001
[5] J. Meyer, J. Wilbert, K. Baier, M. Guckenberger, A. Richter, O. Sauer and M. Flentje, “Positioning Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Combination with a Hexapod Robot Treatment Table,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1220-1228. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.010
[6] N. Hayashi, Y. Obata, Y. Uchiyama, Y. Mori, C. Hashizume and T. Kobayashi, “Assessment of Spatial Uncertainties in the Radiotherapy Process with the Novalis System,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 75, No. 2, 2009, pp. 549-557. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.080

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.