Study of Situation Based Environment towards Noise Reduction during ECG Acquisition

DOI: 10.4236/eng.2013.55B002   PDF   HTML     3,001 Downloads   4,530 Views  


Even with the development of more advanced technology of ECG, there are still problems on interference to ECG signals. Many attempts have been made to detect and eliminate the source of noises and artifacts from the original ECG signals. Several studies have been done to observe and study the EMI effect, however, most of them only focus on the EMI effect of mobile phone during ECG acquisition. Thus, this study is emphasized on the interference problem when other medical devices were being used together with the ECG device. The R-R peak distance of the ECG signal was detected by using QRS detection algorithm invented by J. Pan and W. J. Tompkins. The data from the experiment showed that even the EMI from the medical devices did not affect the physical shape of ECG, but it does affect the R-R peak distance of the ECG signal.

Share and Cite:

N. A. Samad, R. Sudirman, N. H. Mahmood and Y. Y. Yan, "Study of Situation Based Environment towards Noise Reduction during ECG Acquisition," Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 5B, 2013, pp. 6-9. doi: 10.4236/eng.2013.55B002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] M. Lin and E. Peper, “Keep Cell Phones and PDAs Away from EMG Sensors And the Human Body to Prevent Electromagnetic Interference Artifacts and Cancer,” Biofeedback, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2009, pp. 114-116. doi:10.5298/1081-5937-37.3.114
[2] A. Escobar and H. Cadavid, “Electromagnetic Field Environment in a Typical Hospital,” ANDESCON 2010, pp. 1-4, 2010.
[3] W. Y. Wong, R. Sudirman, N. H. Mahmood, S. Z. Tumari and N. Samad, “Study of Environment Based Condition of Electromagnetic Interference During ECG Acquisition,” International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, ICOBE, 2012, pp. 579-584.
[4] M. P. Robinson and N. J. Wainwright, “EMC of Medical Equipment,” York EMC Services Ltd, University of York, Heslington, 1999.
[5] K. S. Tan, I. Hinberg, “Radiofrequency Susceptibility Tests on Medical Equipment,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers, Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Vol. 2, 1994, pp. 998-999.
[6] S. C. B. Cabral and S. S. Muhlen, “Methodology for Identification of Susceptible Areas to Electromagnetic Interference in the Hospital,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Vol. 4, 2003, pp. 3606-3608.
[7] M. Fernandez-Chimeno and F. Silva, “Mobile Phones Electromagnetic Interference in Medical Environments: A Review,” Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), IEEE International Symposium, 2010, pp. 311-316.
[8] W. H. Midgette and J. L. Silberberg, “Medical Device Electromagnetic Interference Problems: A Limited Review,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Vol. 7, pp. 2837-2838.
[9] J. Pan, W. J. Tompkins, “A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm,” Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions, Vol. BME-32, No. 3, 1985, pp. 230-236.
[10] M. K. Islam, A. N. M. Haque, G. Tangim, T. Ahammad and M. R. H. Khondokar, “Study and Analysis of ECG Signal Using Matlab & Labview As Effective Tools,” International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2012.
[11] R. Ranjan and V. K. Giri, “A Unified Approach of ECG Signal Analysis,” International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), Vol. 2, No. 3, 2012.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.