The Implications of Teachers' Professional Attributes on Assimilating a Computerized Learning and Management System in an Israeli School: A Case Study

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2012.38B024   PDF   HTML     3,173 Downloads   4,766 Views   Citations


Assimilating processes of change in teaching methods and their application in school entail considerable difficulty. The teachers' ability and skills as a professional-pedagogic entity in the process of change is the first factor for the occurrence of radical change. This study examines the extent to which teachers' professional attributes predict resistance to change when assimilating a computerized learning management and teaching system (LMS) in school. Teachers from an experimental high school in Israel, which is participating in a comprehensive reform to integrate a computerized LMS system into schools in Israel, participated in this study. A questionnaire regarding resistance to change was distributed to 60 teachers and analyzed using path analysis in structural equation modeling with the statistical AMOS 7.0 (Analysis of Moment Structures) software (Arbuckle, 2006). The findings indicate that a high level of computer literacy amongst teachers predicts low resistance to change; school seniority predicts high resistance to change, as does a key role in school. The contribution of the study lies in understanding that, till now, these attributes were considered to be background attributes. The study identifies their unique impact on the teachers' readiness to assimilate change in school.

Share and Cite:

Orit, A. & Noga, M. (2012). The Implications of Teachers' Professional Attributes on Assimilating a Computerized Learning and Management System in an Israeli School: A Case Study. Creative Education, 3, 116-119. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.38B024.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7. 0 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.
[2] Avidov-Ungar, O., & Friedman, Y. (2011). Empowering teachers – essence and models. Information available to the professional. Jerusalem: Henrietta Szold Institute (Hebrew).
[3] Avidov-Ungar, O. (2010). "Islands of Innovation" or "Comprehensive Innovation" Assimilating educational technology in teaching, learning, and management: A case study of school networks in Israel. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 259-280.
[4] Baskin, E. F. (2004). Change management concepts and models: Sponsorship, early adopters, and the development of urban teachers. In R.B. Cooter, Jr. (Ed.), Perspectives on rescuing urban literacy education: Spies, saboteurs, and saints (pp. 25–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[5] Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
[6] Blau, I. & Hameiri, M. (2012). Teacher-families online interactions and gender differences in parental involvement through school data system: Do mothers want to know more than fathers about their children? Computers & Education, 59, 701-709.
[7] Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher Journal, 33 (8), 3-15.
[8] Buchman, D., & Boddy, D. (1992). The expertise of the change agent. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
[9] Carter, E. (2008). Successful change requires more than change management. The Journal for Quality & Participation, 31 (1), 20-23.
[10] Chong, K. H. (2008). Coping with conflict, confronting resistance: Fieldwork emotions and identity management in a South Korean evangelical community. Qualitative Sociology, 31(4), 36–390.
[11] Coffman, T. (2009). Getting to the heart of technology integration: Virginia's instructional technology re-source teacher program. Learning and Learning with Technology, 36 (7), 20-23.
[12] Collinson, V., Kozina, E., Lin, Yu-Hao K., Ling, L., Matheson, I., Newcombe, L., & Zogla, I. (2009). Professional development for teachers: A world of change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32 (1), 3-19.
[13] Coppieters, P. (2005). Turning schools into learning organizations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28 (2), 129-139.
[14] Cunningham, C. A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25 (2), 46-61.
[15] Goldrat, A. (2001). The connection between the perception of uncertainty, tolerance for ambiguity and a sense of pressure and the attitude of employees towards organizational change. Jerusalem: Henrietta Szold Institute (Hebrew).
[16] De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27 (1), 81-95.
[17] Fullan, M., & Smith, G. (1999). Technology and the problem of change. Available at:
[18] Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2009). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26 (2), 49-55.
[19] Hart, A. W. (1987). A career ladder's effect on teacher career and work attitudes. American Educational Research Journal, 24 (4), 479-503.
[20] Koschmann, T. (2005). Medical education and computer literacy: learning about, through, and with computers. Acad Med. 70, 818-821.
[21] Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54, 588-599.
[22] Ogobonna, E., & Harris L. C. (2003). Innovation organizational structure and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16 (5), 512-533.
[23] Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (1), 65–73.
[24] Virkus S. (2003). Information literacy in Europe: a literature review. Information Research, 8 (4), 1-159.
[25] Woodrow, J. E. J. (1992). The influence of programming training on the computer literacy and attitudes of pre-service teacher. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (2), 200-219.
[26] Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90 (3), 238-249.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.