Prioritizing Riparian Corridors for Water Quality Protection in Urbanizing Watersheds

Samuel F. Atkinson, Bruce A. Hunter, April R. English

.

DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2010.27078                

Abstract

The cumulative effects of urbanization on riparian corridors can decrease the quality of water entering local streams, and ultimately adversely impact drinking water reservoirs of local municipalities. As such, a GIS and remote sensing based analysis tool called the Water Quality Corridor Management (WQCM) model was designed to identify and pri-oritize highly functioning riparian ecosystems for the preservation of stream corridor conditions. Preservation priority among various riparian corridors is established in the model by analyzing five parameters associated with stream corri-dor conditions (vegetation type, erosion potential, surface slope, percent of the stream contained within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year floodplain, and amount of the stream corridor contained within a subwatershed); and each parameter is weighted and scaled based on what conditions are most important to protect. Because data associated with each parameter are readily available and easily manipulated via spatial analysis techniques, the WQCM model functions as a flexible methodology for predicting stream corridor conditions and allows watershed managers to identify potential preservation opportunities to ensure long term ecological functioning that protects water quality. These corridors can then also provide urban planners with potential natural spaces for urban dwellers, meeting multiple benefits requirements imposed by many municipalities.

Keywords

Watershed Management Planning, GIS Modeling, Remote Sensing, Riparian Assessment, Riparian Preservation and Restoration, WQCM Model

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. R. C. Karr and I. J. Schlosser, “Water Resources and the Land-Water Interface,” Science, Vol. 201, No. 4352, 1978, pp. 229- 234.
[2]	P. J. A. Withers and H. P. Jarvie, “Delivery and Cycling of Phosphorous in Rivers: A Review,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 400, No. 1-3, 2008, pp. 379-395.
[3]	D. D. Tullos and M. Neumann, “A Qualitative Model for Analyzing the Effects of Anthropogenic Activities in the Watershed on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities,” Ecological Modeling, Vol. 196, No. 1-2, 2006, pp. 209- 220.
[4]	D. Montgomery, “Geomorphology, River Ecology and Ecosystem Management in Geomorphic Processes and Riverine Habitat,” Water Science Applications, Vol. 4, pp. 2001, 247-253.
[5]	P. J. Wigington Jr., J. L. Ebersole, M. E. Colvin, et al., “Coho Salmon Dependence on Intermittent Streams,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 4, No. 10, 2006, pp. 513-518.
[6]	NRC (National Research Council), “Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management,” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
[7]	D. L. Correll, “Principles of Planning and Establishment of Buffer Zones,” Ecological Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 2005, 433-439.
[8]	P. A. Hamilton and T. L. Miller, “Lessons from the Na-tional Water-Quality Assessment,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2002, pp. 16A-21A.
[9]	EPA, “National Water Quality Inventory, Chapter 2: Rivers and Streams”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/305b, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 7-15.
[10]	R. L. France, “Potential for Soil Erosion from Decreased Litterfall due to Riparian Clear-Cutting: Implications for Boreal Forestry and Warm-and-Cool-Water Fisheries,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 52, 1997, pp. 452-455.
[11]	J. B. Kauffman, R. L. Beschta, N. Otting and D. Lytjen, “An Ecological Perspective of Riparian and Stream Res-toration in the Western United States,” Fisheries, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1997, pp. 12-24.
[12]	R. J. Naiman and H. Décamps “The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones,” Annual Review of Ecology and Syste-matics, Vol. 28, 1997, pp. 621-658.
[13]	P. M. Groffman, D. J. Bain, E. Lawrence, et al., “Down by the Riverside: Urban Riparian Ecology,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 1, No. 6, 2003, pp. 315-321.
[14]	EPA, “National Management Measures to Control Non-point Source Pollution from Urban Areas. Introduction and Management Measures 8, 9, 12,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/841/B-05/004, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1-518.
[15]	S. F. Atkinson, B. A. Hunter, A. English, B. Boe and M. Dameron, “Lewisville Lake Watershed Protection and Management Strategies,” Technical Report Prepared for the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, 2007, p. 155.
[16]	NCTCOG (North Central Council of Governments), Arlington, 10 February 2010. http://www.nctcog.org/ris/ demographics/population.asp
[17]	U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Stream Visual Assess-ment Protocol (SVAP),” National Resource Conservation Service, National Water and Climate Center Technical Note 99-1, Portland, 1998, p. 36.
[18]	A. J. Belsky, A. Matzke and S. Uselman, “Survey of Li-vestock Influences on Stream and Riparian Ecosystems in the Western United States,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 54, No. 1, 1999, pp. 419-431.
[19]	T. Pirim, S. Bennett and B. Barkdoll, “Effect of Riparian Vegetation Density on Stream Flow Velocity,” Joint Conference on Water Resource Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Water Resources, Vol. 104, 2000, p. 347.
[20]	K. Kennedy, “Storm Water: Why Take it Personally?” Fourth Annual Region VI MS4 Operators’ Conference, North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), Arlington, 2005.
[21]	NCTCOG, “12 Lessons Student’s Can Learn from Smart Scape,” North Central Texas Council of Governments, Texas Smartscape Program, Environment and Develop-ment Department, Arlington, 2006.
[22]	C. T. Agouridis, “Cattle Production in a Small Grazed Watershed of Central Kentucky,” Proquest Dissertations and Theses, 2004, p. 485.
[23]	NRCS, “Animal Manure Management－Brief 7,” National Resource Conservation Service, Resources Conservation Act, Washington, D.C., 1995.