Share This Article:

Cultural Dependency: A Philosophical Insight

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:45KB) PP. 123-127
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.22019    4,036 Downloads   8,344 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Every independent country always celebrates or mark the day they were free from colonial rule in the form of “independence day celebrations”. The impression was that they were no longer slaves working under a colonial master. A fleeting glance at cultural markets reveals that despite other competing countries like India, China and Mexico, American culture dominates. This dependency on American products for arts, entertainment, dressing, and lifestyle changes in general is the major thrust of this paper. When a people’s way of life is dictated by the life of another, is it not a form of colonialism? The electronic colonialism theory was used to explain that this dominance by one culture is the modern form of colonialism and has far reaching catastrophic consequences for the dependents and needs to be checked to avoid disaster.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Umeogu, B. & Ifeoma, O. (2012). Cultural Dependency: A Philosophical Insight. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2, 123-127. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.22019.

References

[1] Agba, P. (2002). International communication: Principles, concepts and issues. In S. Okunna (Eds.), Teaching mass communication. Enugu: New Generation Books.
[2] Burch, E. (2006). The “Westoxification” of global communication. In T. McPhail (Ed.), Global communication: Theories, stakeholders and trends (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.
[3] Dean, H. (2003). The third way and social welfare: The myth of post-emotionalism (online). London: LSE Research Online.
[4] Electronic Colonialism (2012) URL (last checked 12 March 2012). www.wikipedia.org
[5] Fevre, R. (2000). The demoralization of western culture: Social theory and the dilemmas of modern living. New York: Continuum.
[6] McPhail, T. (1981). Electronic colonialism: The future of international broadcasting and communication. Newsbury Park: Sage
[7] McPhail, T. (2002). Global communication: Theories, stakeholders and trends. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[8] Okunna, S. (1999). Introduction to mass communication. Enugu: New Generation Books.
[9] Gurevitch, M., Benett, T., Curran, J., & Woolacolt, J. (2005). Culture, society and the media. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
[10] Ferraro, V. (2008). Dependency theory: An introduction. In S. Giorgio (Ed.), The development economics reader (pp. 58-64). London: Routledge.
[11] Rauschenberger, E. (2003). It’s only a movie-right? Deconstructing Cultural Imperialism.
[12] Roberts, I. (2010). Electronic colonialism theory. Global News Canada URL (last checked 12 March 2012). www.canadaglobalnews.blogspot.com
[13] www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_theory
[14] www.utwente.nl/cw/theorieenoverzicht/Theory
[15] www.lass.calumet.pundue.edu/cca/gmj

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.