Share This Article:

Democratized Morality. Formal Preliminaries to Contractualist Ethics

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:121KB) PP. 107-111
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.22016    4,701 Downloads   6,068 Views  

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses one of the advantages of applying formal methods in ethics. First, an approach from democratic morality—which is a special case of contractualist ethics that brings together theories of legal and moral philosophy—will be adopted, in order to argue for the non-trivial thesis that moral norms are increasingly democratically motivated. To accept this thesis also as a desired way of justifying ethical principles raises some issues, such as the problem of providing adequate principles for moral opinion pooling. Secondly, it is therefore shown how formal criteria of rationality provide at least a partial solution to such problems. In a broad context this results can be seen as formal preliminaries to contractualist ethics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Feldbacher, C. (2012). Democratized Morality. Formal Preliminaries to Contractualist Ethics. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2, 107-111. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.22016.

References

[1] Berman, D. K. (2005). Does wall street finally need an ethics code? The Wall Street Journal, C1.
[2] Gert, B. (2009). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
[3] Goodman, N. (1951). The structure of appearance. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
[4] Leonard, R. (2010). Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the creation of game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] List, C., & Pettit, P. (2002). Aggregating sets of judgements: An impossibility result. Economics and Philosophy, 18, 89-110.
[6] Menger, K. (1998). Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums. In E. Dierker, & K. Sigmund (Eds.), Wien: Springer.
[7] Qvortrup, M. (2002). A comparative study of referendums: Government by the people. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
[8] Siegetsleitner, A., & Leitgeb, H. (2010). Mengers Logik für Ethik und Moral: Nichts von Sollen, nichts von Güte, nichts von Sinnlosigkeit. In A. Siegetsleitner (Ed.), Logischer Empirismus, Werte und Moral. Eine Neubewertung (pp. 199-218.) Wien: Springer.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.