Share This Article:

Self-reported cigarette smoking status imprecisely quantifies exposure in pregnancy

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:182KB) PP. 56-61
DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2012.21010    4,490 Downloads   7,385 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Objective: We sought to determine the validity of self-reported smoking activity versus two quantitative measurements of tobacco exposure in pregnancy. We hypothesized that pregnant women would under-report their daily smoking amounts, due to the negative social stigmas associated with such a behavior. Methods: Cigarette-smoking and non-smoking pregnant women were recruited as part of a larger research study. Pregnant women with a singleton baby (>24 weeks) were recruited at a clinical appointment or prior to an elective caesarian section. Self-reported smoking status, including time since last cigarette, was recorded. End-tidal breath carbon monoxide (ETCO) levels and urine cotinine levels were measured and compared. Results: Both normotensive non-smoking (NTN) (n = 44) and normotensive smoking (NTS) (n = 24) pregnant women were recruited. A strong correlation was found between ETCO levels and urine cotinine measurements (r = 0.6566, p < 0.05). Self-reported smoking status in NTS was poorly correlated with ETCO levels (r = 0.5356, p < 0.05) and urine cotinine levels (r = 0.0324, P > 0.05). Conclusion: Self-reported smoking status accurately identifies women who smoke in pregnancy, but not their level of tobacco exposure. Urine cotinine or ETCO are much better quantitative measurements of nicotine and carbon monoxide, respectively, and should be measured for a more precise indicator of smoking activity. These devices will allow for better counseling and monitoring of women who are trying to quit smoking and/or who enter into smoking cessation programs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

C. Venditti, C. and N. Smith, G. (2012) Self-reported cigarette smoking status imprecisely quantifies exposure in pregnancy. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2, 56-61. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2012.21010.

References

[1] Miller, W.J. and Hill, G. (2011) Pregnancy and smoking. Health Reports, 53-56.
[2] Werler, M.M., Pober, B.R. and Holmes, L.B. (1985) Smoking and pregnancy. Teratology, 32, 473-481. doi:10.1002/tera.1420320316
[3] Lindqvist, P.G. and Marsal, K. (1999) Moderate smoking during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scand, 78, 693-697. doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780806.x
[4] Zhang, J., Klebanoff, M.A., Levine, R.J., Puri, M. and Moyer, P. (1999) The puzzling association between smoking and hypertension during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 181, 1407-1413. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70384-4
[5] Soothill, P.W., Morafa, W., Ayida, G.A. and Rodeck, C.H. (1996) Maternal smoking and fetal carboxyhaemoglobin and blood gas levels. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 103, 78-82. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09519.x
[6] Duffus, G.M. and MacGillivray, I. (1968) The incidence of pre-eclamptic toxaemia in smokers and non-smokers. Lancet, 1, 994-995. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(68)91106-9
[7] Jarvis, M.J., Tunstall-Pedoe, H., Feyerabend, C., Vesey, C. and Saloojee, Y. (1987) Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 1435-1438. doi:10.2105/AJPH.77.11.1435
[8] Sillett, R.W., Wilson, M.B., Malcolm, R.E. and Ball, K.P. (1978) Deception among smokers. British Medical Journal, 2, 1185-1186. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6146.1185
[9] Ohlin, P., Lundh, B. and Westling, H. (1976) Carbon monoxide blood levels and reported cessation of smoking. Psychopharmacology, 49, 263-265. doi:10.1007/BF00426827
[10] Dempsey, D., Jacob, P. III, Benowitz, N.L. (2002) Accelerated metabolism of nicotine and cotinine in pregnant smokers. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 301, 594-598. doi:10.1124/jpet.301.2.594
[11] McClure, J.B. (2004) Motivating prepartum smoking cessation: A consideration of biomarker feedback. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6, S153. doi:10.1080/14622200410001669222
[12] Willers, S., Skarping, G., Dalene, M. and Skerfving, S. (1995) Urinary cotinine in children and adults during and after semiexperimental exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Archives of Environmental Health, 50, 130-138. doi:10.1080/00039896.1995.9940890
[13] Benowitz, N.L., Kuyt, F., Jacob, P., Jones, R.T. and Osman, A.L. (1983) Cotinine disposition and effects. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 34, 604-611. doi:10.1038/clpt.1983.222
[14] Haufroid, V. and Lison, D. (1998) Urinary cotinine as a tobacco-smoke exposure index: A minireview. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 71, 162-168. doi:10.1007/s004200050266
[15] Jarvis, M.J., Russell, M.A. and Saloojee, Y. (1980) Expired air carbon monoxide: A simple breath test of tobacco smoke intake. British Medical Journal, 281, 484-485. doi:10.1136/bmj.281.6238.484
[16] Stevenson, D.K., Vreman, H.J., Oh, W., et al. (1994) Bilirubin production in healthy term infants as measured by carbon monoxide in breath. Clinical Chemistry, 40, 1934-1939.
[17] Frederiksen, L.W. and Martin, J.E. (1979) Carbon monoxide and smoking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 4, 21-30. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(79)90017-0
[18] Watts, R.R., Langone, J.J., Knight, G.J. and Lewtas, J. (1990) Cotinine analytical workshop report: Consideration of analytical methods for determining cotinine in human body fluids as a measure of passive exposure to tobacco smoke. Environmental Health Perspectives, 84, 173-182.
[19] Vreman, H.J., Stevenson, D.K., Oh, W., et al. (1994) Semiportable electrochemical instrument for determining carbon monoxide in breath. Clinical Chemistry, 40, 1927-1933.
[20] Usmani, Z.C., Craig, P., Shipton, D. and Tappin, D. (2008) Comparison of CO breath testing and women’s self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 3, 4. doi:10.1186/1747-597X-3-4
[21] Bengea, S., Araki, Y., Ito, O., Igarashi, J., Sagami, I. and Shimizu, T. (2004) Analysis of the kinetics of CO binding to neuronal nitric oxide synthase by flash photolysis: Dual effects of substrates, inhibitors, and tetrahydrobiopterin. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 98, 1210-1216. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.04.009
[22] Vine, M.F., Hulka, B.S., Margolin, B.H., Truong, Y.K., et al. (1993) Cotinine concentrations in semen, urine, and blood of smokers and nonsmokers. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1335-1338. doi:10.2105/AJPH.83.9.1335
[23] Seidman, D.S., Paz, I., Merlet-Aharoni, I., Vreman, H., Stevenson, D.K. and Gale, R. (1999) Noninvasive validation of tobacco smoke exposure in late pregnancy using end-tidal carbon monoxide measurements. Journal of Perinatology, 19, 358-361. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7200193
[24] Kreiser, D., Baum, M., et al. (2004) End tidal carbon monoxide levels are lower in women with gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. Journal of Perinatology, 24, 213-217. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211062
[25] Irving, J.M., Clark, E.C., Crombie, I.K. and Smith, W.C. (1988) Evaluation of a portable measure of expired-air carbon monoxide. Preventive Medicine, 17, 109-115. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(88)90076-X
[26] Jordanov, J.S. (1990) Cotinine concentrations in amniotic fluid and urine of smoking, passive smoking and non-smoking pregnant women at term and in the urine of their neonates on 1st day of life. European Journal of Pediatrics, 149, 734-737. doi:10.1007/BF01959534
[27] Jhun, H.J., Seo, H.G., Lee, D.H., et al. (2010) Self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels among pregnant women in Korea and factors associated with smoking during pregnancy. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 25, 752-757. doi:10.3346/jkms.2010.25.5.752
[28] Klebanoff, M.A., Levine, R.J., Clemens, J.D., DerSimonian, R. and Wilkins, D.G. (1998) Serum cotinine concentration and self-reported smoking during pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148, 259-262.
[29] Wu, T.C., Tashkin, D.P., Djahed, B. and Rose, J.E. (1988) Pulmonary hazards of smoking marijuana as compared with tobacco. The New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 347-351. doi:10.1056/NEJM198802113180603
[30] Patrick, D.L., Cheadle, A., Thompson, D.C., Diehr, P., Koepsell, T. and Kinne, S. (1994) The validity of self-reported smoking: A review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1086-1093. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1086
[31] Caraballo, R.S., Giovino, G.A., Pechacek, T.F. and Mowery, P.D. (2001) Factors associated with discrepancies between self-reports on cigarette smoking and measured serum cotinine levels among persons aged 17 years or older: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 807-814. doi:10.1093/aje/153.8.807
[32] Vartiainen, E., Seppala, T., Lillsunde, P. and Puska, P. (2002) Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 167-170. doi:10.1136/jech.56.3.167
[33] Ford, R.P., Tappin, D.M., Schluter, P.J. and Wild, C.J. (1997) Smoking during pregnancy: How reliable are maternal self reports in New Zealand? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 51, 246-251. doi:10.1136/jech.51.3.246
[34] Lindqvist, R., Lendahls, L., Tollbom, O., Aberg, H. and Hakansson, A. (2002) Smoking during pregnancy: Comparison of self-reports and cotinine levels in 496 women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scand, 81, 240-244. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810309.x
[35] Herning, R.I., Jones, R.T., Bachman, J. and Mines, A.H. (1981) Puff volume increases when low-nicotine cigarettes are smoked. British Medical Journal, 283, 187-189. doi:10.1136/bmj.283.6285.187
[36] Benowitz, N.L., Hall, S.M., Herning, R.I., Jacob, P., Jones, R.T. and Osman, A.L. (1983) Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine. The New England Journal of Medicine 309, 139-142. doi:10.1056/NEJM198307213090303

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.