Open Access Library Journal

Volume 5, Issue 1 (January 2018)

ISSN Print: 2333-9705   ISSN Online: 2333-9721

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.73  Citations  

Evaluation of Yield and Competition Indices for Intercropped Eight Maize Varieties, Soybean and Cowpea in the Zone of Savanna of South-West RD Congo

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 876KB)  PP. 1-18  
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103746    2,063 Downloads   6,003 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

In order to enhance the legumes potential advantages on the cereal yield in intercropping system by nitrogen direct transfer from legume to cereal, an intercropping experiment was conducted between eight maize varieties (07SADVE, 08SADVE 1, 09SADVE F2, Mudishi 1, Mudishi 3, VP0523, ZM538 and Samaru), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata var. H4) and soybean (Glycine max var. Vuangi) during November 2011-February 2012 season at INERA/Mvuazi in the south-western country of DR Congo. The experimental design was a Split plot with four replications, twenty six treatments were applied between maize varieties monocrops (40.000 plant·ha﹣1) and legumes in monoculture (360.000 plant·ha﹣1) and both of sole planting were combined. Evaluation of these soles planting was performed on basis of several intercropping indices (MYE, LER, ATER, RCC, A and CR), the monetary advantage index (MAI), Actual Yield Loss index (AYL) and intercropping index (IA). After data analysis, competitivity indices indicated the higher yields advantages of maize varieties in intercropping, especially Mudishi 3-soybean (MYE = 2836.300 kg·ha﹣1). The equivalent land ratio (LER) varied with 08SADVE 1variety between 0.70 and 1.66 in cowpea and soybean intercrops respectively, the Relative crowding coefficient (RCC) showed yield advantage of all intercrops except with 09SADVE F2, Mudishi 1 and 07SADVE. Aggressivity (A) showed dominance of maize in all intercrops, against the Competitive ratio (CR) showed that the competitivity was stronger on cowpea (from 16.42 to 98.63) than soybean (from 16.12 to 25.70). Actual yield loss (AYL) was negative in all intercrops with cowpea and soybean. Thus, the index of association (IA) informed that the negative values of the different intercrops were due to the maize price (1000 CDF·kg﹣1) and legumes price (1500 CDF·kg﹣1). Finally, the monetary advantage index (MAI = 922.92) and PCA had determined that intercrop with Mudishi 3-soybean as an economic efficiency intercrop than others mixtures.

Share and Cite:

Khonde, P. , Tshiabukole, K. , Kankolongo, M. , Hauser, S. , Djamba, M. , Vumilia, K. , Vumilia, K. and Nkongolo, K. (2018) Evaluation of Yield and Competition Indices for Intercropped Eight Maize Varieties, Soybean and Cowpea in the Zone of Savanna of South-West RD Congo. Open Access Library Journal, 5, 1-18. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1103746.

Cited by

[1] Effect of spatial arrangement and cropping systems on the productivity of cassava-legume intercropping systems in three Agro-climatic zones of Sierra Leone
World Journal of …, 2022
[2] Simulation of the Growth and Leaf Dynamic in Quality Protein Maize and Soybean Intercropping Under the Southwestern Savannah Conditions of DR Congo
Open Access Library …, 2022
[3] Evaluate the Competitive Interactions among Component Crops in Cassava-Legume-Based Intercropping Systems
Current Research in …, 2022
[4] Response of Quality Protein Maize to the Synchronization of Application and Needs for NPK Fertilizer in Acid Soils of the South-West of the DR Congo
Open Access Library …, 2022
[5] Growth responses of maize-soybean intercropping system and its potential for cattle feed in Bali
… Series: Earth and …, 2022
[6] Intercropping indices of fodder maize (Zea mays) and fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) under various row proportions
2022
[7] ETUDE ET MODELISATION DE LA PRODUCTIVITE DES SYSTEMES DE CULTURE BASES SUR LE SEMIS DIRECT SOUS COUVERT VEGETAL DANS LA …
2021
[8] Fabrication, Characterisation, and Biological Properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles Containing Rapeseed Pollen Extract (RPE) on the MCF-7 Cell Line
2021
[9] Maize (Zea mays) Intercropping with Legumes Enhances Growth, Dry Matter and its Forage Yield under Deficit Irrigation
2020
[10] Keunggulan Ekonomis Tumpangsari Kedelai dengan Jagung di Lahan Kering Iklim Kering
2020
[11] Reduced stomatal conductance and irradiance account for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] yield decline in maize-soybean intercrop
2020
[12] Effect of Sorghum/Pulses Intercropping on the Productivity of Farmlands in the Moisture Deficit Areas of Belesa District, North West Ethiopia
2020
[13] Productivity and biological N 2-fixation in cereal-cowpea intercropping systems in sub-Saharan Africa. A review
2020
[14] Evaluation of the Association and Rotation of Maize with Legumes, in Direct Sowing in the Democratic Republic of Congo
2020
[15] IMPACT OF SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT ON GROWTH, YIELD AND PROFITABILITY OF MAIZE–GROUNDNUT INTERCROPPING SYSTEM
2019
[16] Keunggulan Kompetitif Agronomis dan Ekonomis Lima Belas Genotipe Kedelai pada Tumpangsari dengan Jagung
2019
[17] Yield, yield attributes and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) strip intercropping
2019
[18] Ecology of maize-cowpea intercropping on biological nitrogen fixation, productivity and grain mineral composition along soil fertility gradients in Zimbabwe.
2019
[19] Ecology of maize-cowpea intercropping on biological nitrogen fixation, productivity and grain mineral composition along soil fertility gradients in Zimbabwe …
2019
[20] ERISON MARTINS AMARAL

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.