International Journal of Clinical Medicine

Volume 1, Issue 2 (November 2010)

ISSN Print: 2158-284X   ISSN Online: 2158-2882

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.60  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Fast Track Gynaecologic Surgery in the Overweight and Obese Patient

Full-Text HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 83KB)  PP. 64-69  

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To review the outcomes of overweight and obese patients undergoing laparotomy and managed with a Fast Track Surgical (FTS) protocol. Methods: Between January 2008 and May 2010 patients having a laparotomy and managed on a FTS protocol were identified. They were compared to patients with a normal body mass index (BMI). Data was collected in a real time fashion and analysis undertaken in a retrospective fashion. Results: 194 patients were identified, 94 (48.4%) classified as normal BMI, 51 (26.3%) as overweight and 49 (25.3%) as obese. A vertical midline incision was performed in 170 (88%) patients. When comparing the group of overweight/obese patients (n = 100) to those with a normal BMI (n = 94) there was no significant difference in the number of benign or malignant pathologies, FIGO stage, age, insurance status, complexity of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, haemoglobin change, or need for transfusion. The proportion of patients successfully fast tracked and able to tolerate early oral feeding was similar. Patients classified as overweight or obese were significantly more likely to have a poorer performance status, have un¬dergone vertical midline incision and to have had COX II inhibitors withheld. The median length of stay (LOS) was 3 days for the patients with a normal BMI and also 3 days for those overweight or obese. Conclusions: Overweight and obese patients undergoing a fast track surgical protocol after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery have similar out comes when compared to patients of normal body mass index.

Cite this paper

J. Carter, S. Philp and V. Arora, "Fast Track Gynaecologic Surgery in the Overweight and Obese Patient," International Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2010, pp. 64-69. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2010.12011.

Cited by

[1] МУЛЬТИМОДАЛЬНАЯ СТРАТЕГИЯ ВЕДЕНИЯ БОЛЬНЫХ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОГО ПРОФИЛЯ (FAST TRACK ХИРУРГИЯ)
2017
[2] Fast track: хирургические протоколы ускоренной реабилитации в гинекологии
Здоровье женщины, 2016
[3] Patients' Perspectives of Fast-Track Surgery and the Role of the Fast-Track Clinical Nurse Consultant in Gynecological Oncology
Holistic nursing practice, 2015
[4] Enhanced recovery pathways in abdominal gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2015
[5] A 5-Year Review of Gynaecological Oncology Patients Managed by a Fast Track Surgery Program
International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2014
[6] Patients' satisfaction with fast‐track surgery in gynaecological oncology
European journal of cancer care, 2014
[7] In Reply
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
[8] Enhanced Recovery in Gynecologic Surgery
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
[9] Fast-track surgery in Gynaecology and gynaecologic Oncology: a Review of a Rolling clinical audit
ISRN surgery, 2012
[10] Re: Sidhu VS, Lancaster L, Elliott D & Brand AH, Implementation and audit of 'Fast‐Track Surgery'in gynaecological oncology surgery, ANZJOG 2012; 52 (4): 371–376
Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2012
[11] Re: Reimplementation and audit of 'Fast Track Surgery'in gynaecological oncology surgery
Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2012
[12] Development and extended experience with a fast track surgery program in a gynaecological oncology service
The Open Women's Health J, 2011
[13] Department of OB/GYN, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Obstet Gynecol, 2010

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.