Electromagnetic Shells of Atoms and the Periodic System of Elements

Experimental and theoretical researches performed by the author (period: 1969present) showed that the magnetic spinor particles (magnetic charges) are real structural components of atoms and substance and are immediate sources of all magnetic fields and magnetic manifestations in Nature. Magnetic charges, which constitute together with electrical charges the atomic shells, got of the Author’s title: magnetons and antimagnetons (respectively, with magnetic charges g and g, under fundamental condition: g = e). Besides, together with electrons and magnetic charges in the structures of atomic shells, in the same quantities as the electrons, exist real electric antispinors, i.e. the true antielectrons. In the structures of the atomic shells on each electron fitted still three a real spinor particles: two magnetic (magneton and antimagneton) and one electric, i.e. true antielectron with a charge of e. The spinor particles in atomic shells exist in the form of the two spinor associations: the electromagnetic dibispinors or S-Gravitons and magnetic bispinors (spinorial magnetic dipoles). Magnetic bispinors, which inhabited on the 3d and 4f-shells are the sources of the atomic magnetic fields and are responsible at all magnetic manifestations of the so-called magnetic atoms (iron, nickel, cobalt and others). In composition of SGraviton is two related bispinor (electric and magnetic). S-Gravitons make up bulk of the charged density of atomic shells and are direct sources of the atomic gravitational field. If to replace all electrons on known of the atomic levels and sub-levels on S-Gravitons, can get an idea about the real electromagnetic device atomic shells most of the elements making up the Periodic Table. In article shows features the structural organization real (electromagnetic) shells of atoms that make up the periodic system of elements, as well as is considered the possibility of adaptation of the well-known quantum numbers, the Pauli’s principle and Hund’s rule, in relation to the atomic electromagnetic device. The main reasons for the fact that the real magnetic charges, as well as the true antielectrons, were “buried alive” in the modern theories are as physics confinement them in atoms and substance, which is cardinally different from *At present works as individual researcher, Dr. of physical and mathematical sciences. How to cite this paper: Sizov, R.A. (2016) Electromagnetic Shells of Atoms and the Periodic System of Elements. Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 2374-2397. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.716206 Received: November 29, 2016 Accepted: December 27, 2016 Published: December 30, 2016 Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Magnetic and Electric Charges in the Atomic Shells. Real Magnetism of Atoms and Substance
Magnetic charges (magnetic spinor particles) as immediate sources of all magnetic fields and magnetic manifestations in the Nature were discovered by the author in structures of atoms and substance and were presented to the scientific society in 2001 in publication [1]. Experiments that prompted the author to study the problem of participation of the real magnetic charges in structure atoms and substance were his experiments with the magnetic neutron scattering in ferrimagnetic crystals [2] [3] (1970)(1971). Detected in these experiments, a significant displacement of all density so-called magnetic moments Fe 3+ ions from the nuclei served as a basis for the author's assumption of possibility structural participation of the magnetic charges in atoms and substance. The results of subsequent experiments conducted by the author [4] [5] [6] showed that in the structures of the Physical mass (atoms, nucleons, substance, etc.), the magnetic particles (spinors and antispinors) are present in approximately the same amount as the electric particles. Brief summaries of the results of basic experiments of the author in the English language are given in the publication [6]. Note 1. For greater lucidity, we note that the concept "the spinor particle" used in the article should be attributed solely to the fundamental charged particle with electric or magnetic charge, and the term "the spinor particle" is synonymous of term "the Magnetic bispinor (the magnetic spinorial pair: magneton and the corresponding him antimagneton) which revolving on atomic orbit and also in the lattice conductor, will be create in the plane rotation of the well-known of the vortex magnetic field, that is determined by the vortex vector rotH. Direct process of formation the latter field is described by equation: k rotJ g = rotH, where rotJ g is vector of the vortex current of magnetic charges, and in model representation is of the rotating magnetic bispinor, k-the proportionality factor. The above-described process of direct formation of the vortex magnetic field is shown in Figure 1(a).
It is important to note that the swirling motion of the magnetic bispinors in the conductor is ensured by constant electric current. This process is written in the following form: k J e = rotJ g , where J e is the vector of the density linear electric current. The role of the direct electric current under the formation of the vortex magnetic field around the conductor, consists solely in "organizing" the vortex motion of magnetic bispinors. In the absence of magnetic charges near lines of the electric current, the magnetic field can not be formed.
Thus, compulsory sequence of the actual physical processes in a conductor with a constant electric current, which leads to the formation of vortex magnetic field, can be written as: J e  rotJ g  rotH. We will notice that in Maxwell's electromagnetic (EM) concept, in which the real magnetic charges were ignored (unintentionally), the se- Figure 1. Schemes of mechanisms formation of the vortex spinor fields: magnetic (a) and electromagnetic (gravitational) (b). By white circles on the figure showed negative charged electric and magnetic spinors: electron (e − ) and magneton (g − ) and black circles-positively charged antispinors corresponding to them with charges e + and g + .
quence of processes at formation of magnetic field round the conductor with direct electric current is represented as follows: J e  rotH [7].
Next, it is important to note, that the first person who discovered experimentally the magnetic charges in the substance was F. Ehrenhaft [8], who published about forty articles from 1910 to 1945, dedicated to the discovery and study of real magnetic charges.
The Ehrenhaft experiments this magnetic analogues of known tests Milliken which was aimed at determining the magnitude of the charge of the electron. Very small particles of various solid substances were placed into vertical uniform magnetic field, free from residual electric charges. The particles were illuminated by concentrated light beam.
The optical system was made it possible to determine parameters of their movement.
The basic experimental result of Ehrenhaft and his numerous followers consisted in the fact that it was found a logical movement of the particles along power lines of the magnetic field. With changing the field direction the direction of particles movement also changed. According to the findings Ehrenhaft, motions of particles that observed in his experiments, determined by charged state of the particles and charged namely by magnetic charges different signs.
However, interpretation of the experimental results which was built by Ehrenhaft on analogy with behavior of electric particles in the electrostatic field, does not appear convincing enough. Besides, values of forces in the observed interactions were comparable, for example, with parasitic, so called, radiometric forces. It is also obvious, and then that such serious conclusions which were made by Ehrenhaft, has need in deepening and first of all in the sense of development of conceptions about physical parameters of magnetic charges (magnetic spinor particles) and their place within the substance structures. In any event, the experiments of Ehrenhaft and his followers, which brought interesting and important results, did not obtain recognition and were forgotten.
In 1931 the question about possibility of existence of magnetic poles, so called magnetic monopoles, was considered by P. Dirac [9] within the framework of quantum electrodynamic. According to conclusions of the Dirac, the quantum theory, like and classical theory, well allowed existence of magnetic monopoles. However, the minimum possible magnetic charge (g) of such particles turned out to be extremely great, according to the theory-68, 5e, where e is charge of an electron.
In its publications [5] [6] [10], the author notes that a magnetic field which gives off the Dirac's monopoles, are created by means of the electric currents moving along the Dirac's strings. This field is a whirling magnetic field, which is described by the vortex vector rotH. Thus, the Dirac monopole theory is, in fact, a disguised form of electromagnetic concept Maxwell.
The only good thought which can be learned from this theory Dirac, according to the author of this article, is the assertion that namely the magnetic charges are responsible for the quantization of the electric charges of particles in the structures of mass (atoms, nucleons, substance etc.). Detection by the author of the present article of the real magnetic charges in structures of atoms and substance, is of the simple confirmation marked above the conclusion of Dirac, in relation a quantization charges of electrons. Subsequent searches of magnetic poles are based predominantly on the conclusions of Dirac's theory. At the same time, the experimenters adhered to the so called electric technologies and tried to extract the magnetic charges from the substance approximately in the same way as were generally accepted in operation with electric particles.
It should be noted that all these numerous and expensive experiments gave only negative the results.
The equation of the process of formation magnetic field under the influence of the electron current in a conductor, which is known as the first equation Maxwell's (k J e = rotH), is the superficial mathematical "photograph" of the famous experiment of Oersted.
As noted above, in the framework of the processes of formation of the vortex magnetic field (rotH) in a conductor with a constant electric current, are implemented successively two different physical process: 1) k 1 J e = rotJ g and 2) k 2 J g = rotH. It is important to emphasize, that the coefficients k 1 and k 2 in the above equations, in principle, not equal to each other (k 1 ≠ k 2 ).
An erroneous electromagnetic concept Maxwell's, which was formulated in the absence of knowledge about the real micro-processes that occur in the body of conductor with a constant electric current, it turned kind of "tombstone" on the ways of the positive development of physical science. This "tombstone" has significantly reduced the interest of physicists at the problem of existence of the real magnetic spinor particles and also proved to be one of the main reasons of appearance of numerous false and even mystic directions in the theoretical (predominantly mathematical) physics. It should be underlined that during all the years that passed, from the moment of Oersted's discovery (1820), the official physical theory so and could not formulate unambiguous and definitive answer to the following question: what is really a direct source of the magnetic field and which physical micro-processes in a conductor with electric current are responsible for its formation.
Namely the vicious EM-concept of Maxwell is responsible to considerable part of the mystique in the physical theory. So, with one hand, the electric spinors, for example, electrons, emit electric field that determined by the strength vector E. On the other hand, the same electrons in process of their movement in the conductor, within the framework of electric current, creates of the vortex magnetic field, which is described by the axial vector rotH, according to the generally adopted physical theory of Maxwell. Arisesan impression that the electric particles, especially electrons, are not simple electro-spinors but some kind the electromagnetic "monsters". For example, even in the Big Encyclopedic Dictionary "Physics" (RUS edition of 1999) can read the following: "electric charge-source electromagnetic field" or "electric field is a particular form of the electromagnetic field". Note 2. By the author of this article had to hear of statements of historians of physical science that Maxwell himself had nothing against magnetic poles (charges) and had even intentionally left for them in place in his EM-theory. But this "place" has not had any impact on the negative consequences that has followed from this theory. Of course, we can assume that the Great physicist had some doubts and even could to consider his EM-concept as the first approach to reality. But the following generations of theoreticians not very burdened themselves with doubts and have admitted of the defective concept of Maxwell's, as the ultimate truth.
It should be added that such a problem as the existence of true antielectrons, i.e. of positively charged electric antispinors in atoms and substance, which was developed by the author, is the result that closely connected with his of many years of experimental and theoretical studies of the real magnetic charges [5] [11].
As mentioned above, the main reason that the real magnetic charges and also the true antielectrons, were "buried alive" in the modern physical science is physics their retention (confinement) in the structures of atoms and substance, which is cardinally different from the confinement of electrons. Very negative role in development of the physical science is played the fallacious electromagnetic concept Maxwell, in which the magnetic field, by mistake, was deprived of its own source, of the magnetic pole or of the magnetic charge.
It is important to note that Journals the "Nature" and "Nature Physics" from 2008 to 2014 published a series of reports about the experimental detection of the so-called collective magnetic monopoles and their currents in the "spin ice" (see, for example, [12] [13]). The magnetic effects which observed in the "spin ice" are manifestations, in our opinion, of the real magnetic particles (magnetons and antimagnetons). However, the authors of the above-mentioned experiments adhered to traditional views, explaining their the results by of the special types of collective electronic states. This last interpretation, again in our opinion, is the result of more than century-long influence on the minds by of vicious concept Maxwell.

The Reasons That Was Delayed the Recognition of Real Magnetic Charges, as Well as the True Antielectrons in the Physical Science
A natural question arises: how can the magnetic spinorial particles, which, in the opinion of the author, present in the physical masses (nucleons, atoms, substances, etc.) in about the same quantities as and electric particles, can remain invisible for of physicists more than the hundred years?
There are several reasons of this.
1) In the first phase happened the superficial interpretation of the results of the experiment of Oersted, when only the obvious participants of experimental process were taken into account i.e. electric current and the magnetic field around the conductor.
This superficial interpretation was admitted by Maxwell as a basis for his EM-theory, ignoring the popular wisdom that "the truth never lies on the surface". Namely this superficial EM-theory of Maxwell, has launched in of physical science the vicious assertion that magnetism is an emanation of the electricity.
Of course, the magnetic field around the conductor with a constant electric current is a real experimental fact (experiment of Oersted). However, not fact, that this field is di-rectly produced by electrons. So, for example, with the same "success", we can conclude that it is an electric current that comes from the power supply to a hair dryer, pushes air out his nozzle, if not to know about the existence of an electric motor and fan and not hear their the noise and vibration. Not there is no doubt that if would be vortexes of magnetic charges, organized in a conductor under the influence of electric current, were able to create noise and vibration, Maxwell would make a completely different conclusion about the true source of the magnetic field.
In reality, all fundamental fields i.e. electric field and magnetic field, are generated exclusively by corresponding by poles-spinors, and development and use Maxwell's EM-concept during 140 years, has turned out to be the most unsuccessful exit from the situation which took place in Physics at the end XlX-th century as a result of the simple and regrettable fact, the absence on that moment, of reliable detection of real magnetic charges.
2 Basing on his own experiments and also on the results of other researches the author has discovered that magnetons (as and antimagnetons) can't be torn out of the substances by pumping in it energy. Under increasing the internal energy of the body (the target), has place increase forces retention of the magnetic charges in substance.
The concepts free particle with respect to the electric and magnetic charges, are significantly different. If electric charges, for example, an electrons, can relatively easily extracted from the substance and to fly freely into air space, magnetic charges can't to leave the substance. The essence of "freedom" magnetic particles consists in the fact that they don't interact with electric charges inside the substance at any particular moment of time. Free condition of magnetic poles is achieved by deep cooling of the substance (superconducting state). It's important to underline that only a part of magnetic spinorial particles occupying the so-called a potential zones of conductivity, can be into such a free state. It follows from the above given considerations, in unlike of electric spinors, impossible to extract an individual magnetic particle out of substance and to force her to fly in the space (outside a physical mass).
Let us explain the latter statement. in the condensed state of substance on a scale of energy. It's well known that the electronic levels be found in a potential pit and for exit of an electron into the state free from links with a substance is necessary to supply him additional energy, for example, warm it.
But since the levels of magnetic charges is located under so-called of the potential cupole, for exit these particles in the free state, a substance must be cooled, i.e. necessary to reduce its internal energy. At the deep stages of cooling there arises the super- Figure 2. The disposition scheme on the energy scale of levels: of electrons (in the energy "pit") and magnetic charges (under the energy "cupola"). So, for an electron exit in free state from bond with a substance, it is necessary to increase internal energy of substance, for example, to heat it. The free condition of the magnetic spinorial particles is reached at deep cooling of substance, for example, in the condition of superconductivity.
conductivity effect what probably is an evidence of transition of magnetic spinor particles into the states free from substance bonds with the lattice. In this case, electric current passes through superconductor practically without resistance, since the free magnetic charges rotating around the lines of current, do not experiencing friction about of the lattice conductor. Any energy pumping of substance (irradiation, heating and so on) pushes the magnetic charges on higher of the energy levels.
General physical conditions confinement of the spinor particles and, in particular, of magnetic charges, in within substance, were considered in publications of the author (see [1] [5]) and the most detailed analysis was given in [10].
3) Toreasons that have been outlined above in this section, need to add the reason subjective. In the beginning XX-th century when F. Ehrenhaft began publishing the results of their experiments related to discovery and investigation of magnetic charges, the problems of these particles have not considered as sufficiently important and attractive for the majority of theoreticians. In 1931 P. Dirac again has paid attention to this problem [9]. But as it was shown in the publications of the author, this "shot" of Great theoretician turned out to be "the blank", since a giant charge of the Dirac's monopole (the minimum value-68,5 e) has exclude any possibilities of participation of monopole in the structures of physical masses (atoms, substances et al.). For convinced "electricians" the real magnetic charges turned out to be not only redundant but also in some sense harmful, since their existence meant collapse of the theoretical "castles in the air" built without their participation.

Electromagnetic Shells of Atoms and Nucleons Are Direct Source of the Vortex Electromagnetic (Gravitational) Field. Paragravitation, Ferrogravitation and Gravito-Levitation
On the basis of his own experimental and theoretical investigations [1]- [6] the author has shown that the atomic shells are electromagnetic but not purely electronic as it is [ ] e g k rot rot where E and H are vectors of instantaneous intensity of electric and magnetic fields in the structure of the vortex electromagnetic (gravitational) field and k-the proportionality factor. From the above Equation (1), is obvious that the gravitational field this the electromagnetic vortex field which is characterized by changes in orientation vectors tension of the electric and magnetic fields (E and H), which are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction at each point.
Minus signs between the vectors of currents and tensions that exhibited in the above- In addition, in Figure 1 shown, that the magnetic vortex field, which is determined by the vortex vector rotH, is formed by the rotating magnetic bispinor or, that too, by means of the rotating the magnetic dipole. The elementary source gravitational field is S-Graviton which can be defined as the dynamic EM-dibispinor, i.e. two related bispinor (electric and magnetic), rotating in opposite phase on one atomic orbital. The classical equations of the processes formation magnetic and electromagnetic (gravitational) of fields also shows in Figure 1. The gravitational field, which is generated by masses in the absence of polarization of the vortex vectors rot[J e − J g ] in their structures, is a tensor or quasi-scalar field. And again, by analogy with magnetism, such field can to define as paragravitational field.
We write the mathematical expressions that determine the states of the ferro-and with experiments of Tajmar M. and de Matos C. J. [20] in which, in our opinion, the experimental gravitational field was also discovered. Unfortunately under interpretations of observed effects, they were explained: in work [19] as a manifestation of antigravitation, and in the article [20] as a manifestation of the so called gravitomagnetic field, because their authors had no idea about presence real magnetic charges in the structures of atoms and substances. It should be noted that definition of the gravitational field as gravitomagnetic, given in [20] has relation to physical reality, since as magnetic field, so and gravitational field are the vortex fields and are described by vortex vectors: rotH-magnetic field and rot[E − H]-gravitational field.
In his publications the author permanently underlined that without introduction of real magnetic charges into basic physical concepts it's impossible to unblock approaches, for example, to such important spheres of science and engineering as experimental and technical gravitation.
Research author of this article showed, that namely the atomic-shaped structure, which includes the electromagnetic shell and the nucleus, is a prerequisite for ensuring the ability to the emission of gravitational field. Consequently, all varieties of mass which, in the opinion of the author, necessarily structured in atomic-shaped form, can be defined as the Gravito-forming structure or GFS.
Thus, for example, the nucleons this "small" atoms with their own shells and nucle-

Physical Triad and "Dark Energy" in the Real World
The results of years research of the real magnetic spinor particles allowed the author to Namely "Dark Energy" is real forces factor, performing the whole dynamics of particles and bodies, as the scale of the Universe (the movement of galaxies, stars, planets and other objects) so and in the microcosm, for example, the dynamics of spinor particles within a physical mass, such as in atoms, nucleons, etc. In detail, the concept of Physical Triad of the real World contained in two editions of the author's book [10], and reviewed in [18].
Note 5. Since "Dark energy" is induced in the Energo-medium by means of spinor fields, i.e. fields of charged particles, her effect on particle and masses, can be formally attributed to the effects of spinor fields, which induce certain types of "Dark energy".
Lower, in this article, will be considered a variety of the power influences on the particles and masses, which are carried out by the "Dark energy". In order to reduce the volume of the article, we shall henceforth refer to these effects, by behalf of spinor fields, at the same time bearing in mind that in this case is the place the action of "Dark energy".

The Configurations (Electromagnetic Formulas) of Atomic Shells and the Periodic System of Elements
According to the author's conclusions, which he did on basis his many years of experi- So recording of the electromagnetic configuration or the electromagnetic formula of the hydrogen atom will have the following form: 1 G 1s , which means the existence in the shell of the hydrogen atom of one S-graviton, instead one electron. Recall that in the composition this quasi-particle: two the electric spinor particles (the electron and antielectron) and two magnetic (magneton and antimagneton with charges g − and g + ).
Magnitudes of the charge of the particles in the atomic shells meet the condition: e = g.
The real structure of the hydrogen atom can be represent if in Figure 1(b) mentally deliver proton in its center. In detail, the actual device the shell of hydrogen atom, given by the author in the publications [11].
Electromagnetic configurations of the atomic shells of helium and beryllium should be written as: As for the situation with unfilled shells, there is a need to introduce in the recording configurations additional components in form magnetic bispinors that fill these shells until they are completely filled. Namely magnetic bispinors, not fictitious, so-called "unpaired" or "magnetic" electrons, are the real sources of eddy magnetic fields, which are described as rotH. These magnetic fields in existing theories, in the "absenc" of real magnetic charges, were replaced by such fictitious concepts as the magnetic moments.
Magnetic bispinors, designation which can be as mb, implementing in the shells the so-called of magnetic atoms (iron, nickel, cobalt and others.), filling in them the shell 3d. Furthermore, the magnetic bispinors occupy 4f shells, what and determines the atomic magnetism of rare earth elements.
Next, we write the electromagnetic formula of the iron atom, with the inclusion in his 3d shell four of the magnetic bispinors (on the number of the "unpaired electron spins"): In accordance with the rules of the author on filling the atomic shells, can write the electromagnetic formula of shell of the rare earth gadolinium (Gd). According to the existing theory, the 4f shell Gd involves seven, so-called, the unpaired electrons: 1s 2 , 2s 2 , 2p 6 , 3s 2 , 3p 6 , 4s 2 , 3d 10 , 4P 6 , 5s 2 , 4d 10 , 5P 6 , 6s 2 , 4f 7 + (7) mb , 5d 1   The author conducted experiments to elucidate the nature of volatility atoms (molecules) gases on example volatility of hydrogen gas. These simple and obvious experiments showed that the hydrogen rises upwards under the influence of the paragravitational Earth field [5] [16], that is under the impact of the Gravito-levitational forces.

Main Types of the Intra-Atomic and Interatomic Interactions
It should be noted that the involvement of Archimedes to explain the volatility of the atoms of light gases (hydrogen, helium, and others), according to the author, is very primitive and harmful speculations.
2) Next, we consider the possibility of a direct electrostatic interaction between the electrons belonging to the compositions S-gravitons, with electric charges of the nuclei.
It is important to note that in this case the electric field which is emitting of the rotating electric bispinor, in full must be in composition of the gravitational field emitted by S-graviton. Therefore, it is not very clear is possible in reality, to snatch a static field of an individual electron from the gravitational field of the S-graviton, for the implemen- Physics of the binding forces of nucleons in nuclei was noted above in Section 3. A de-tailed analysis of the strong interaction of nucleons in nuclei, which is realized under the influence of the gravitational "Dark energy", is given in the author's publications [10].
3) In accordance with the physical logic presented above, in the basic (undisturbed) state of atoms the direct electrostatic binding forces as between the quasiparticles, constituting atomic shells, so and between them and the nucleus, are hardly probably.
However, the same cannot be said relative to the perturbed atomic states. The per- The critics of his model representations are reminded, that "the magnetic electrons" move in such a way can't, and they absolutely right. In the marked displacements from nuclei in the investigated ferrites, participate not electrons, and exclusively the magnetic charges. Since the magnetic bispinors are able to emit only the magnetic field, they not included in the systems of gravitational interactions. Thus, the nature interactions of the magnetic bispinors in structures of magnetic materials differ significantly from interactions S-Gravitons. Can expect that the retaining forces of the magnetic bispinors in atomic shells much weaker than the forces that hold the S-Gravitons. Thus, the internal fields in crystals, which are realized as a result of cationic substitutions in some of the magnetics may, as shown in [2] [3], to cause anomal displacements of the magnetic bispinors away from of atomic nuclei.

Conclusions
The disregard by the physical science, for nearly 200 years (since the discovery Oersted in 1820) of existence of the magnetic spinor particles (magnetic charges) and also true antielectrons in the structures of the physical mass (atoms, nucleons, substance and other) turned out to be extremely harmful both for Physics so and in General for the natural Sciences. The main reasons which prevented the recognition of these fundamental particles discussed in detail in numerous publications of the author, as well as given in Section 2 above. "The lack of" magnetic charges and true anti-electrons in the physical representations forced theorists to look for a suitable replacements (theoretical "prostheses"), which can help them explain many magnetic and electromagnetic phenomena observed experimentally.
Namely, theoretical prostheses such as the magnetic moments, helped "to close" in physical theory such serious theoretical problem, as the true nature of magnetism. In addition, in the author's publications (see [6] [11]), it is shown that namely by the theoretical prostheses are a "holes" of the Dirac and his the famous magnetic monopole.
According to the author, should be attributed to theoretical prostheses and proposed in the publications [12] [13] the collective magnetic monopoles, which, is supposed, are responsible for all the magnetic manifestations in the compounds with the structure of the spin ice. Feature in the description of the last magnetism is that the magnetic field in of "spin ice" is created not by the electric current, as in Maxwell's concept, but only by means of electron spins. In other words, the forward movement of the electrons under the formation of the magnetic field, was replaced of them a twisting motion.
However, the most harmful for science and technology was the invention and introduction in notions of the model purely electronic shell of the atom. It seems that there is no need to explain the last statement, since the atom is for us is of the fundamental physical essence. A distorted view of the compositions of atomic shells caused great harm of the natural Sciences, and also significantly put the brakes on the promotion of world scientific and technical progress.
Of course, the model of the electron shell of atoms this is of a grand theoretical "puncture", but should be aware that first place on the harmfulness in Physics is necessary all the same to give of C. J. Maxwell and his fallacious electromagnetic concept.
Namely vicious EM-concept of Maxwell, which is called in publications author as vicious virus "Maxwell", can to associate with the "cancerous" an education in "body" of theoretical physics, the "metastasis" which, pierce through many directions of physical science, giving them a false and even mystical significance. Among such directions, other than those listed above may be mentioned, for example, such resonance theoretical constructs as global expand Universe, very big explosion and a big gap, the field and the Higgs boson, the representation of the gravitational field in the form of a curved four-dimensional space, and many, a lot others.
The author hopes that common sense finally will win over the harmful thinking of "electricians". Just because is impossible still 200 years old, while ignoring the real magnetic charges and common sense, be faithful to the erroneous electromagnetic teaching of Maxwell and vicious belief that the mechanical movement of electric charges and the spin of electrons, capable replace a such natural source of the magnetic field as the magnetic pole or magnetic charge. Common sense, the author's opinion, is the act of last hope, since of the experimental evidences of the existence of real magnetic charges in the atoms and substance, by now, has accumulated more than enough.