N. KOSAREV ET AL.
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. MSCE
b) dislocations bend and then follow between particles
leaving concentric dislocation loops around them—Oro-
van model [4,8].
Most theoretical justification and experimental con-
firmation are gotten by Orovan model specified by Ash-
by [9].
Releases of the second phase follow to significant in-
creasing of flow stress and deformation hardening, re-
sulting in the first stage suppression on the hardening
curve. In polycrystalline except direct interaction of dis-
locations with par ticles grain boundary hardening effects
due to the grinding of structure are essential. Acting as
barriers for movement of dislocations grain boundaries is
providing additional hardening [8], which add to harden-
ing by Orovan. At the same time indirect effect of sec-
ond-phase through the grinding of structure can signifi-
cantly exceed its direct str engthening effect, i.e. the main
effect created by second phase is the grinding of struc-
ture.
Thus in film systems the main result of hardening is
determined by indirect effect of second-phase particles:
high dispersion of particles and grinding of structure
when a small volume fraction of particles. In a theory
about plastic def ormation of inhomogeneous material the
density of dislocations is connected with solid flat parti-
cles at Ashby [8] as
ρс: density of statistically distributed dislocations, ρg:
density of geometrically needed dislocations.
In polycrystalline grain boundaries may be considered
as analogy of flat particles as almost impassable barriers
for dislocations. In common case it is known that the way
of influence grain diameters to physical and mechanical
properties is in the barrier effect of grain boundaries at a
slip [4]. In fine-grained materials the most likely way of
plastic deformation is a slip.
Usually common density of dislocations in a material
is proportional to degree of plastic deformation [4,8]. In
this case the tension иbecause of dislocations and dislo-
cation loops circling particles obstructs further move-
ment of the slide and has an influence to issues of dislo-
cations. Because of this in the early stages of deforma-
tion yet the strain hardening rate dσ/dε will strongly
higher than for massive alloys. As a result there is inten-
sive increase of dislocation density with increase of de-
gree of deformation. Then we may get the equality for
dispersion-hardened material provided that geometrically
necessary dislocat i ons a re distrib ut e d h omogeneo us l y:
and c,ρε o
ρ
=+ (7 )
Г: shear deformation.
Replacing Г through mε (m: Tailor factor) and mark-
ing value 4 mn/b through В, we get
(8)
ρо: density of dislocations in the infinitely large grain .
Solving (2) and (8) in common, we get equation
(9)
Let’s consider possible special cases.
1) When n = 1, we ignore value ρо ≅ 0, this equality
transfers to equation got by Van der Beikel [9] for plas-
tically deforming metals.
2) In case of fine-grained material А < Вd – 1. If we
ignore value ρо ≅ 0 and mark
, then
we get Hall-Petch equation.
3) In case of hard-grained material А > Вd – 1 and ρо ≅
0 we get
1/2
).
o
т
σσ( )(ρfaGbA n
ε
=++
(10)
Analysis of Equation (9) shows that observed strength
properties of electroless precipitated copper caused by
high density of dislocations and ultrafine structure. Be-
cause of this, a metal possess of low plasticity was also
watched by experiments for various materials and alloys.
So Equation (9) may be used in a wide range of grains
diameters and density of dislocations.
REFERENCES
[1] B. N. Smirnov and M. L. Khazin, “Fol’ga Dlya Pechat-
nyh Plat/Foil for Printed Circuit Boards,” UB of RAS,
Ekaterinburg, 2003, p. 376.
[2] K. Wang, N. R. Tao, G. Liu, J. Lu and K. Lu, “Plastic
strain-Induced Grain Refinement at the Nanometer Scale
in Copper,” Acta Materialia, Vol. 54, 2006, p. 5281.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.013
[3] L. S. Palatnik and V. K. Sorokin, “Materialovedenie v
Mikroelektronike, Materials Science in Microelectronics,”
Energiya, Moscow, 1977, p. 280.
[4] M. L. Bernshtein and V. A. Zaimovskij, “Mekhani-
cheskiye Svoistva Metallov, Mechanical Properties of
Metals,” Metallurgiya, Moskow, 1979, p. 495.
[5] O. E. Osintsev and V. N. Phyodorov, “Med’ i Mednye
Splavy. Otechestvennye i Zarubezhnye Marki, Copper
and Copper Alloys,” Russian and Foreign Brands, Ma-
shinostroenie, Moscow, 2004, p. 215.
[6] M. A. Meyers, A. Mishra and D. J. Benson, “Mechanical
Properties of Nanocrystalline Materials,” Progress in
Materials Science, Vol. 51, 2006, pp. 427-556.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003
[7] A. V. Nokhrin, V. N. Chuvildeev, V. I. Kopylov, et al.,
“Sootnoshenie Holla-Petcha v nano-i Microcristalliches-
kih Metallah, Poluchennyh Metodami Intensivnogo Plas-
ticheskogo Deformirovaniya, Hall-Petch Ratio in Nano-
and Microcrystalline Metals Received by Methods of In-
tensive Plastic Deformation,” Vestnik Nizhegorodskovo
Universiteta Imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo, Vol. 5, No. 2,
2010, pp. 142-146.