Advances in Physical Education
2013. Vol.3, No.4, 154-157
Published Online November 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ape) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ape.2013.34025
Open Access
154
Mixed Doubles Match Technical and Tactical Analysis of World
Badminton Champion Based on Mathematical Statistics
Bing Zhang, Feng Li, Weiqi Jiang
Institute of Physical Education, Huanggang Normal University, Huangzhou, China
Received July 3rd, 2013; revised August 3rd, 2013; accepted August 10th, 2013
Copyright © 2013 Bing Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons At-
tribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited.
This paper uses mathematical statistics method and analyzes the main scoring techniques: the serve tech-
nique, the jump smash technique, the net lob technique, the pushing backcourt ball technique and the
smash technique by analyzing the data of the 29th Olympic Games by He Hanbin/Yu Yang (China) and
Nova/Nasir (Indonesia). The analysis shows that: in the badminton mixed doubles match, since both sides
are partners for many years, in order to win the game you must have good badminton technique; particu-
larly the error rate of the net lob technique and the pushing backcourt ball technique is high, which needs
further practice. The study plays a certain role in promoting the development of badminton technique and
the popularization of badminton sports.
Keywords: Echnical and Tactical Analysis; Badminton; Mathematical Statistics
Introduction
The most exciting moment in badminton competition is the
smash technique in doubles, where one side jumps high and
smashes in the backcourt, the other side hits the ball back to the
backcourt. In doubles many scores often rely on smashing in
the backcourt. In doubles one should avoid to be the defensive
side (Tian, 2004). Moreover one needs offensive, which is the
victory method in the doubles. The basic tactical intent in dou-
bles is to make the opponent hit the ball up. When the oppo-
nents hit the ball upward, you can attack through the under
pressure. When you must hit the ball up, you’re in the defense.
At this time, your consciousness should be looking for oppor-
tunities to counterattack. The most successful defense is to
make opponents can no longer attack next shot (Zhang et al.,
2013).
Many studies at home and abroad have shown that the adept
skills and quick reactions are necessary in the doubles. But one
needs more than this as good double players (Chen, 2009). The
most critical consciousness is looking for opposite side’s vul-
nerabilities and looking for the best counter attack opportu-
nities in defense. The key to defensive is not to turn two people
into wall, although hitting back the opponent’s ball back can
consume opponent’s physical stamina. But successful defense
should counterattack, which is the so-called active defense (Pan,
2001). When you strike the ball high, you must realize that if
your ball has no threat, you may be probably in a defensive
position. The offensive way is various. Similarly you also need
to apply various techniques to obtain initiative according to
opponent’s technique and stance (Geng, 2004).
In this paper, we consult related information online and read
some related badminton magazines. There are not many tech-
nical analyses for the badminton mixed doubles in the world.
Thus it is necessary to conduct related technical analysis on live
games of Chinese athletes He Hanbin/Yu Yang and the Indone-
sian athletes Nova/Nasir (Cheng, 2005). This paper uses mathe-
matical statistics methods to analyze the technical and tactical
of world badminton champion, who plays a certain role in pro-
moting the development of badminton technique and the popu-
larization of badminton sports.
Research Object
This article consulted competition technical and tactical data
at the 29th Olympic Games of two sets of the world’s top ath-
letes He Hanbin/Yu Yang (China) and Nova/Nasir (Indonesia)
through the Internet, as shown in Table 1.
Analysis and Discussion
Winning and Losing Points Analysis
On August 16, 2008 in Beijing Chinese players He Hanbin/
Yu Yang lost to the Indonesian athletes Nova/Nasir by 1:2 in
the 29th Olympic Games badminton mixed game (Cheng,
2008). Chinese players win the first game by scoring 21 points,
among which directly attack scored 8 points (accounting for
38.08% of the total score). The Indonesian players send 13
points due to mistakes (accounting for 61.88% of the total
score). The Chinese players directly mistakes 6 points in the
first game (accounting for 28.56% of the total losing score).
The major mistakes: one pushing backcourt ball (accounting for
4.76% of the total losing score), one smash ball (accounting for
4.76% of the total losing score), 2 deep clear balls (accounting
for 9.52% of the total losing score); Indonesian players score 11
points by direct attack (accounting for 73.32% of Chinese play-
ers’ total losing points), 2 jump smash (accounting for 13.33%
of Chinese players’ total losing points), 2 pushing backcourt

B. ZHANG ET AL.
Table 1.
China and India semi-final technical data sheets of badminton mixed doubles in Beijing 20 08 Olympic Games.
Name Scores Gains and losses situationServe Jump smash Push backcourt ball Smash Total
The success number 2 4 2 0 8
Percentage 9.52 19.04 9.52 0 38.08
The mistake number 0 2 3 1 6
The first game 21
Percentage 0 9.52 14.28 4.76 28.56
The success number 1 2 1 2 6
Percentage 9.09 18.18 9.09 18.18 54.54
The mistake number 0 5 6 1 12
The second game 11
Percentage 0 23.70 28.56 4.76 57.12
The success number 0 0 2 4 6
Percentage 0 0 9.52 38.08 47.6
The mistake number 1 5 5 2 13
He Hanbin/Yu Yang
The third game 21
Percentage 4.34 21.70 21.70 8.68 56.42
The success number 0 4 4 3 11
Percentage 0 26.66 26.66 20.00 73.32
The mistake number 7 0 6 0 13
The first game 15
Percentage 33.33 0 28.56 0 61.88
The success number 2 3 3 1 9
Percentage 9.52 14.28 14.28 4.76 42.84
The mistake number 1 2 1 1 5
The second game 21
Percentage 8.33 16.66 8.33 8.33 41.65
The success number 0 3 4 3 10
Percentage 0 13.02 17.36 13.02 43.40
Nova/Nasir
The third game 23
The mistake number 1 6 7 1 15
ball (accounting for 13.33% of Chinese players’ total losing
points), 3 smash balls (accounting for 20.00% of Chinese play-
ers’ total losing points).
Chinese players lost the second game by 11:21, among
which directly attack scored 6 points (accounting for 47.6% of
the total score). The Indonesian players send 5 points due to
mistakes (accounting for 52.4% of the total score). The Chinese
players directly mistakes 12 points in the first game (accounting
for 57.12% of the total losing score). The major mistakes: 1
jump smash (accounting for 4.76% of the total losing score), 4
smash before the net (accounting for 19.04% of the total losing
score), 6 pushing backcourt ball (accounting for 28.56% of the
total losing score), 1 smash ball (accounting for 4.76% of the
total losing score). Indonesian players score 9 points by direct
attack (accounting for 42.84% of Chinese players’ total losing
points). Main factors of successful attack by Indonesian players:
2 serve (accounting for 9.52% of Chinese players’ total losing
points), 3 jump smash (accounting for 14.28% of Chinese play-
ers’ total losing points), 3 pushing backcourt ball (accounting
for 14.28% of Chinese players’ total losing points), 1 smash
(accounting for 4.76% of Chinese players’ total losing points).
(Table 1).
The Serve Landing Area Change
The serve landing area schematic diagram in badminton dou-
bles is shown in Figure 1. Doubles serve can be divided into
the frontcourt ball and backcourt ball. Moreover the frontcourt
ball can be divided into Zone 1 and Zone 2 according to the
landing area; the backcourt ball is divided into Zone 3, Zone 4.
The serve technique is one important technique in the dou-
bles event; its impact on the outcome is far greater than the
singles event. The quality of serve has a direct impact on active
and passive, is an important link of score and mistakes. Serve
accuracy and serve change rate are two reliable indicators that
reflect the serve quality. We can see from Table 2 that the
serve landing area of the top players in the world today are
mostly in Zone 1 frontcourt, accounting for 83.7% of the total;
followed by Zone 4 in the backcourt accounting for 7.2% of the
total; the error rate of serve was 4.1%; serve direct scoring rate
was 6.6%.
Through study of Table 2, we find that the serve succe ss rate
and stability of Sino-Indian players are much higher in the
mixed doubles. Due to judgment errors, the error rate of Chi-
nese players is slightly higher than that of the Indonesian play-
ers. We can see from the video data that there is no significant
difference between He Hanbin/Yu Yang’s serve landing area
changes and that of Nova/Nasir. This is different with the re-
search results of Chinese scholar Yongmin Cheng’s article
“Winning rule of badminton’s double and the key of the com-
petition ability of men’s double”. His article thinks: serve
change rate of Chinese athletes has a large gap with the world
Open Access 155

B. ZHANG ET AL.
Table 2.
Serve landing zone and serve directly score table of each team.
Serve landi n g zone
Serve athletes Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Mistakes Scores Total
He Hanbin/Yu Yang (Chin a) 74 (88.4%) 4 (4.8%)1 (1.2%) 2 (2.4%) 3 (3.6%) 4 (4.8%) 84
Nova/Nasir ( Indonesia) 90 (93.75%) 2 (2.08%)1 (1.04%) 1 (1.04%) 2 (2.08%) 6 (6.25%)96
Clark/Blair (England) 13 (59.1%) 5 (22. 7 %)1 (4.5%) 1 (4.5%) 2 (9.1%) 1 (4.5%) 22
Jung Jae Sung/Lee Yong-dae (South K orea) 25 (80.6%) 2 (6.5%)2 (6.5%) 1 (3.2%) 1 (3.2%) 0 (0.0) 31
Figure 1.
The schematic diagram of badminton doubles venue.
top players; there are significant differences. This is perhaps
due to in recent years we have made significant progress in the
mixed doubles competition and training.
The effect of service and receiving has great relation with the
serve quality. When the serve changes quickly and quality is
high, the receiving side is relatively in a passive state. For serv-
ing side, it helps control the initiative of entire situation and has
important significance on winning. Today’s world-class mixed
doubles player’s service and receiving give priority initiative.
This may be limited by the rules. Badminton serve is not much
of a threat, which also verifies that it is not very easy to scoring
by serve. One can only attain the goal to contain opponents
through serve time change a n d placement change (Table 2).
Technique Ana lysis of Winning and Losing Points by
Jump Smashes
Through the study of Table 3, Chinese players are signifi-
cantly inferior to the Indonesian players in the jump smash
technique. It indicates that Chinese player’s ball control tech-
nique before the net is not in place, requiring the improvement
of the technical level. The jump smash technique is mainly used
in situations where due to the other side’s mistakes the serve
ball is too high, then directly smash on the ball. In the high
level competition it doesn’t appear too often but sometimes it is
also a means to win.
Technique Ana lysis of Winning and Losing Points by
Net Lob
By the research of data in Table 4, the net lob technique
needs further improvement in the badminton mixed doubles. In
the badminton mixed doubles match, the players of both sides
are competition combination through year’s coordination, and
have good tacit understanding during the game. Moreover it is
difficult to find neutral in front and back field during a high
Table 3.
Winning and losing poin ts ta b l e o f Sino-India athlete’s jump smash.
Jump sma s h
Serve athletes SuccessMistake NumbersScores
He Hanbin/Yu Yang
(China) 5 3 8 5
Nova/Nasir
(Indonesia) 7 0 7 7
Table 4.
Winning and losing poi n t s ta b l e o f Sino-India athlete’s net lob.
Net lob
Serve athletes Success Mistake Numbers Scores
He Hanbin/Yu Yang
(China) 1 7 8 1
Nova/Nasir
(Indonesia) 3 7 10 3
level competition. The only way is to violently smash to make
the other side have mistakes. So the proceeding of net lob tech-
nique is prone to cause mistakes when the opponent is not in a
proper place catching the ball.
Technique Ana lysis of Winning and Losing Points by
Pushing Backcourt Ball
Through Table 5, we find that pushing backcourt ball is a
technical method difficult to master like the above net lob in the
badminton mixed doubles match. The success of pushing back-
court ball lies in two aspects: one is to seize the opportunity to
push the ball to the opponent vacancy and score, the other is
scoring by opponent’s misjudgment. Pushing backcourt ball is a
usual technical method in mixed doubles match. Through push-
ing backcourt ball, opponents can make mistakes in returning
the ball. Then one can seize the opportunity to score. But im-
proper master of the ball’s intensity and direction can easily
make the ball fly out of the field or the sideline. The pushing
backcourt ball technique is not only a technical means causing
opponent’s mistake but also an important factor causing one’s
own mistake.
Technique Ana lysis of Winning and Losing Points by
Smash
The smash technique is the most important score means in
badminton game. If the ball is fast, it can easily and directly
cause opponent’s untimely response then score. Successful
smash can also increase the mood and excitement of themselves
and their teammates, making them more spirited in the game.
Through the study of Table 6, although the scores by directly
Open Access 156

B. ZHANG ET AL.
Table 5.
Winning and losing points table of Sino-India athlete’s pushing back-
court ball.
Pushing backcourt ball
Serve athletes Success Mistake Numbers Scores
He Hanbin/Yu Yang
(China) 5 14 19 5
Nova/Nasir
(Indonesia) 11 14 25 11
Table 6.
Winning and losing points table of Sino-India athlete’s smas h .
Smash
Serve athletes Success Mistake Numbers Scores
He Hanbin/Yu Yang
(China) 6 4 10 6
Nova/Nasir
(Indonesia) 7 2 9 7
smash is not high, smash technique is the most widely used
technical means in the badminton competition. During doubles
matches, both sides play with a tacit understanding. One cannot
directly kill the ball in several shoots, so the number of success
is not huge.
Conclusion
This paper analyzes the main scoring techniques: the serve
technique, the jump smash technique, the net lob technique, the
pushing backcourt ball technique and the smash technique by
watching the game video of the 29th Olympic Games by He
Hanbin/Yu Yang (China) and Nova/Nasir (Indonesia). The
analysis shows that: in the badminton mixed doubles match,
since both sides are partners for many years, in order to win the
game you must have good badminton technique; particularly
the error rate of the net lob technique and the pushing backcourt
ball technique is high, which needs further practice.
In face of pressure, China’s two young athletes seem lack of
experience. In the face of the sophisticated Indonesian oppo-
nents Nasir/Nova, they adhere to the final, but failed. Although
the result of the game is not satisfactory, but the whole process
illustrates that the young combination will be the next Olympic
legend. In last year’s Danish Open badminton, He Hanbin/Yu
Yang won the Super Series champion first time after the pairing.
After the match IBF (International Badminton Federation) offi-
cial website expressed great interest in this “Star of Hope”, and
hailed them as new hope of Chinese mixed doubles.
The semi-final opponents Nasir/Nova are the strongest mixed
doubles players in the world following Zhang Jun/Gao Ling. In
the 2005 and 2007 World Championships, Nasir/Nova won the
champion twice. The two not only have tacit cooperation, but
also Nasir’s net technology and Nova’s key ball handling are
both superior; meanwhile they have rich experience in big
competition, and they are the strongest opponents for Chinese
mixed doubles at the Olympics. In the record against them, the
Chinese team Zheng Bo/Gao Ling have advantages, while He
Hanbin/Yu Yang are obvious in disadvantage (Chen, 2009).
In the match two young athletes obviously lack some prepa-
ration. Especially Yu Yang has a marked change psychologi-
cally after winning the doubles champion; she always feels a
little nervous about the outcome on the court. He Hanbin de-
spite has the brave killing method, but the young edgy defects
result in his mistakes constantly. This is particularly evident in
the deciding game. Although He Hanbin/Yu Yang have great
energy, but the handling of key balls still seems immature. At
first they should have grasped the field point several times, and
won in one fell swoop; but they repeatedly have mistakes lead-
ing to the final defeat.
Objectively speaking, He Hanbin/Yu Yang have no big
shortcoming in technique. The biggest shortcoming is lack of
experience, especially the experience of the Olympic Games.
Badminton is not only a game of physical and technical; more
often psychology can decide the outcome of the game. Young
athletes are not very “seasoned” in this aspect especially. How-
ever, after the baptism of various big and small competitions,
they will perhaps become the hope of the future of Chinese
badminton mixed doubles combination.
REFERENCES
Chen, Y. (2009). Strategies and tactics on the badminton competition.
Badminton, 6, 56-57.
Cheng, Y. M. (2005). Effect of skill style on performance of men’s
double of China badminton team. Journal of Shandong Physical
Education Institute, 21, 88-90.
Cheng, Y. M. (2008). Winning rule of badminton’s double and the key
of the competition ability of men’s double. Journal of Shandong
Physical Education Institute, 24, 83-85.
Geng, Y. D. (2004). Analysis of selective principle and implement out-
line for badminton tactics. Journal of Shaoguan University, 25, 93-
95.
Pan, L. (2001). The influence of new game system on badminton dou-
bles of lady competitors. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical
Education, 15, 138 -139.
Tian, J. N. (2004). Study on third strike of serving side to force the pace
in men’s double event of badminton. Journal of Nanjing Institute of
Physical Education (Natural Science), 12, 37-39.
Zhang, B., & Feng, Y. (2013). The special quality evaluation of the
triple jump and the differential equation model of long jump me-
chanics based on gray correlation analysis. International Journal of
Applied Mathematics and S t a tistics, 40, 136-143.
Open Access 157