Wireless Sensor Network, 2013, 5, 61-66
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/wsn.2013.53008 Published Online March 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/wsn)
An Ad-Hoc Low Cost Wireless Sensor Network for Smart
Gas Metering
Oscar Rorato1, Silvano Bertoldo1, Claudio Lucianaz1, Marco Allegretti2, Riccardo Notarpietro1
1Department of Electronic and Telecommunications (DET), Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy
2National Consortium of Universities for the Physics of Atmospheres and Hydrospheres (CINFAI), Local Unit c/o, Polytechnic of
Turin, Turin, Italy
Received January 24, 2013; revised February 22, 2013; accepted March 4, 2013
ABSTRACT
The monitoring of power consumption has become of a great interest in recent years as well as the innovative technolo-
gies available to realize Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have experienced a great growth. While smart metering
technologies for electric energy are already established, as sensors power supply comes directly from power lines, WSN
nodes for gas metering should necessarily be equipped with long life batteries. The presented work describes a new
prototypal low cost WSN designed ad hoc for gas smart metering. The network has a star topology: each sensor node
can be completely integrated with standard reed relay gas meter, and it is capable to measure the gas consumption. The
information is sent to the central node (the Access Point, AP) through an RF links. The sensor nodes have been de-
signed with custom electronics and a proprietary firmware, in order to work with a common 3.6 V lithium battery which
is able to ensure a life period of about 10 years for each node. Only the AP must be connected directly to electric power.
The AP is connected through the RS-232 interface to a control embedded PC equipped with a LAMP (Linux, Apache,
MySQL, PHP) framework: it stores all the information coming from each node in a coherent database and allows au-
thorized users to check the network status using a web interface. The WSN is self-learning and it is capable to detect
new nodes joining the network without altering the normal operative flow. Moreover e-mail and SMS alerts can be ac-
tivated to alert if a node is disconnected from the network or some problems occur. A first prototype of the WSN has
been already tested achieving good results.
Keywords: WSN; Smart Grid; Smart Metering; Gas Metering; Energy Metering; Electronic Board; Ad-Hoc Designed
Board; Low Cost
1. Introduction
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have become very
important in recent years because of their numerous pos-
sible applications. They are used for collecting, storing
and sharing data, for environmental monitoring applica-
tion [1,2], surveillance purposes [3], sport performance
evaluation [4], agriculture [5], home automation applica-
tions and, very important and topical, they are increas-
ingly used for energy management.
The Smart Grids, which are particular WSNs devoted
to energy management, are emerging as a convergence of
information technology and communication technology
with power system engineering and metering technolo-
gies. A more detailed definition can explain better what
are the “Smart Grids” today emphasizing their relevance.
They can be defined as networks that can intelligently
integrate the actions of all users connected to them using
digital technologies. Basically their goal is a moderniza-
tion of already existing energy grids with ICT technolo-
gies, joining power-delivery systems and customers, and
allowing a two-way communication between them. A
paper of Panajotovic et al. [6], presents a very detailed
description of the state of the art of the smart grid and
their close relationship with ICT.
The Smart Grids will have a key role in the transfor-
mation of the current functionality of the energy distribu-
tion system, aiming both to offer a user-oriented service
and to help energy distribution companies. They will
help European countries to achieve the so called objec-
tives “20/20/20” (Horizon, 2020) the next European
framework program for research and innovation.
It has to be noted that a Smart Grid should be able to
provide one or more of the following new capabilities:
self-healing, high reliability, energy management, and
real-time pricing for every kind of energy sources [7].
Therefore, from a design perspective, Smart Grids will
incorporate new technologies as advanced metering,
automation, communication, distributed generation, and
distributed storage.
C
opyright © 2013 SciRes. WSN

O. RORATO ET AL. 62
Usually the words “Smart Grids” are referred to the elec-
trical distribution systems because the grids usually have
strict power requirements. By using more modern tech-
nologies for WSN it is also possible to implement Smart
Grids for different energy sources such as the gas energy.
A new experimental and prototypal Wireless Sensor
Network has been completely designed, realized and test-
ed as an ad-hoc smart grid for gas metering able to give
to gas operators a simple and cheap tool to keep under
control the costumers gas consumption.
In the next paragraphs all aspects of the prototypal
smart grid will be described.
2. General Description of the Grid for Smart
Gas Metering
The smart grid for gas metering has been designed with a
master-slave architecture and star topology. A central
node, called Master Node or Access Point (AP), receives
data coming from all the peripheral nodes and dialogues
with an embedded control PC. It has to be noted that
each slave nodes communicates only with the master
node with a unidirectional link.
The control PC is a common commercial embedded
PC which can be connected to internet using either a
GPRS router or a wired internet connection. It allows
both locally and remotely authorized users (e.g. the gas
company which delivers the service) to control the gas
consumption. Moreover the PC stores all the data coming
from the sensor node in a dedicated database and can
send SMS and e-mail alerts, if such functionalities are
turned on. Both the control PC and AP node are con-
nected to power lines because of their high computa-
tional load.
Each slave node is directly connected to a gas meter
equipment, which is almost never connected to power
lines. To ensure a life period of almost 10 years (avoid-
ing a too frequent battery replacements by maintenance
workers), the nodes’ electronics have been designed to
have an almost irrelevant current consumption and they
can be fed up by a common 3.6 V lithium battery.
The sensor node has been designed in order to receive
information coming from a commercial pulse transmitter.
It is connected to a common commercial gas meter in
order to count the pulses detected by its reed relay switch.
In fact, even if some high resolution electronic gas meter
systems have been experimentally realized [8], most gas
meters used for residential purposes are still using me-
chanical diaphragms technology connected to reed pulse
gas meter. The number of counted pulses are sent to the
AP using the standard Wireless M-BUS protocol [9].
Knowing the correspondence between a single count and
the gas consumption it will be possible to evaluate the
gas consumption by each meter installed by the custom-
ers.
On the basis of such information, each other operation
(e.g. suggest a reduction of the gas consumption, alert
that the consumption are different from the average
ones… ) can be performed in future developments of the
prototypal wireless sensor network.
3. Sensor Node Description
The sensor node (Figure 1) is developed to perform the
following tasks:
 Reading pulses from gas meter equipments;
 Storing the temporary number of counted pulses on
local memory waiting to send to the AP;
 Managing Wireless Meter Bus protocol for download
data to the AP;
 Error handling.
The system on chip (SoC) used for the node of the
smart grid is the Texas Instruments CC430F5135: it in-
tegrates in a single solution both the microcontroller and
the radio, thus reducing costs and power consumption.
The radio can operate in different frequency bands (300 -
348 MHz, 389 - 464 MHz, 779 - 928 MHz) with very
little firmware and hardware modifications. The develo-
ped smart grid prototype operates a 868 MHz.
The board power consumption depends on the chosen
operating modes. In particular it is very sensitive to the
selected output power (up to a maximum of 10 dBm)
which cause a consumption to a few tens of milli-Am-
peres [10]. In the described prototype, low power firm
ware techniques have been adopted in order to properly
managed the board, reducing the power consumption,
keeping the microcontroller in the so called “Low Power
Mode” as long as possible, since in that condition the
amount of absorbed current is equal to a few micro-
Amperes. It is possible to achieve a theoretical durations
of 10 years using commercial standard lithium batteries
of 3.6 V.
Figure 1. Realized electronic board for smart grid nodes.

O. RORATO ET AL. 63
3.1. Reading Pulses from Gas Meter Equipments
The electronic boards for the described smart grid have
been completely designed: they have two interfaces to
manage both open collector output than reed relay
switches. For the smart grid, only the second interface
has been used (Figure 2).
The microcontroller acquires the pulse thanks to the
right setting of the dedicated pin. The pulse trigger a soft-
ware interrupt able to update the pulse count.
3.2. Storing Pulse on Local Memory
The pulses read by the electronic board are stored on the
local flash memory of the microcontroller waiting to be
send to the AP. The available memory size is enough for
the purposes of the described smart grid.
3.3. The Communication Protocol
A detailed description of the wireless metering protocol
state of art is reported in a work by A. Sikora et al. [11].
Anyway the Meter Bus (M-BUS) protocol and the wire-
less version (Wireless M-BUS or WM-BUS) are the
“de-facto” standard for all the smart metering grid.
The M-BUS protocol is the most common standard
used for the so called Automatic Meter Reading (AMR)
implementation, very useful for remote energy meter
reading. It is based on European standard EN 13757-2
(for physical and link layers) and EN 13757-3 (for appli-
cation layer). The M-BUS can be used in different to-
pologies of Smart Grids, including the star topology used
for the presented network. When interrogated, the meter
nodes (the slave nodes) send the data to a concentrator
(the master node devoted to receive and manage data
from each slave node) that can be also remotely placed if
an internet connection is available.
The WM-BUS standard is another European standard
defined in EN 13757-4 (for physical and data link layers)
and in EN 13757-3 (for the application layer). It defines
Figure 2. Example of common gas metering system. The
black box is the commercial pulse transmitter which is
connected to the sensor board of the smart grid shown in
Figure 1.
different possibilities of communication between remote
meters and mobile devices, stationary receivers, and data
collectors and storage devices [12].
The WM-BUS standard is designed to give a long bat-
tery life for grid nodes powered with batteries, to avoid
often battery replacements during the normal life time of
a network node. Moreover it has to be noted that the pre-
sented smart grid for gas metering does not require the
complete version of the WM-BUS protocol which has
more complete and complex features [13]. It is sufficient
a limited version which is currently in use in a lot of ex-
perimental and prototypal grids and which can be freely
downloaded from the web. It is only necessary to adapt
such protocol to the system on chip used in the custom
realized electronic boards, thus reducing the realization
costs of the WSN.
Among the different modes available with WM-BUS
protocol, the described network uses the Stationary Mode
(S-Mode), which allows an unidirectional link between
meter nodes and the AP. It is in fact only necessary that
each sensor node sends its data to the central node,
without waiting any acknowledgement answer.
The S-Mode defines a radio link type with the follow-
ing characteristics:
 Manchester data coding;
 32.768 k baud typical;
 868 MHz ± 100 kHz as operational frequency;
 Typical receiver sensitivity of −105 dBm to ensure a
BER of 10−2.
All the described characteristics, including the packet
length, suit very well with the proposed WSN solution
for smart gas metering.
To handle the WM-BUS protocol, dedicated firmware
functions have been developed and integrated on the mi-
crocontroller. A proprietary algorithm, based on the ap-
proach “listen before talk”, has been developed to ma-
nage and avoid the collision when more than one node
want to transmits at the same time.
3.4. Error Handling
The electronic board of each sensor node is able to han-
dle any failure such as low battery, possible short-circuits
on reading pin, quartz and clock problems. Its firmware
is realized to switch on a specific led for different error
or malfunctioning, and to stop sending data to the AP in
case of failure. An authorized user connected to the smart
grid web interface, or whose e-mail address or phone
number is part of the list at which the AP sends e-mails
and SMS, can thus note that a specific node is no longer
active, and can program a maintenance field intervention
in order to repair or substitute the damaged node. The
specific failure is identified by the corresponding led
turned on without performing difficult tests.

O. RORATO ET AL. 64
4. Central node Description
The central node is made up by the Access Point (AP)
node, which is directly connected to the embedded PC.
The communication between the AP and the embedded
PC is performed through the standard RS-232.
4.1. The Access Point Node
To further reduce the production costs of the electronic
boards, the hardware of the AP electronic board is the
same of the one adopted for the meter nodes. In fact,
even if the AP is the only node which uses the RS-232
standard, the interface has been placed on all the node to
serialize the board production. It possible to substitute
each node of the smart grid with another by only modi-
fying the firmware.
The AP receives WM-BUS packets coming from each
nodes and forwards each packets to the embedded PC.
4.2. The Embedded PC
The embedded PC performs four basic functions:
 reception of the information acquired from the AP;
 storage of node values in a coherent database, thus
providing a database server;
 representation of the network status on the web inter-
face, thus providing a web server;
 sending e-mails and SMS alerts if the dedicated func-
tionalities are active.
All the functions are performed simultaneously while
the PC is connected to internet through a GPRS router or
a wired connection, if available.
The PC is equipped only with open source software
and a LAMP platform is installed on it, in order to create
an easy to use system, compliant with international stan-
dards. The LAMP platform includes Linux (Debian 6.0)
as operative system, Apache as web server, MySQL as
database server and PHP as scripting and programming
language. This is one of the most globally used frame-
work and allow the prototypal grid to be a base for a fu-
ture more complex system development.
The reception of the information on RS-232 interface
is managed by an ad-hoc developed C software which
stores the read values coming from each node in the da-
tabase. It uses open source libraries and checks if a node
is still connected to the smart grid (a node is assumed to
be disconnected or not active if does not transmit any
data for 10 minutes). The same software creates a spe-
cific log file which allows to control the correct func-
tioning of the network and the correct reception of the
packet coming from the AP.
The web interface has been realized using both HTML
and PHP languages. It is accessible only after an authen-
tication procedure, and it is made up by two sections.
The main section shows the last read values coming from
each node, with the corresponding timestamp, while a
graphical indicator shows if a node is still active and
connected to the smart grid (Figure 3). The second sec-
tion shows the last 10 rows of the log file and allows to
have an immediate indication in case of network prob-
lems (Figure 4).
If a node becomes disconnected from the smart grid or
some problems occur, e-mail or SMS alerts are also sent
by the AP to a list of selected addresses or phone num-
bers. Such functionalities can be turned on or off using a
configuration file editable by authorized users.
The database is made up by two tables: the first con-
tains the information related to the smart grid nodes and
the seconds contains the data related to the pulse detected
by each sensor node and sent through radio channel to
the central node (Figure 5 shows the implemented struc-
ture).
The tables respect the referential integrity constraint. If
a node is connected for the first time to the grid its inser-
tion into the database is managed by well designed store
procedures and triggers. Such triggers are activated be-
fore the record containing the data read by the node is
stored into the right table of the database. It is thus
Figure 3. Example of web interface. It reports the informa-
tion about each network node. In the reported situation
node 5 is no longer connected to the smart grid.
Figure 4. Example of web interface. It reports the last in-
formation reported in the log file.

O. RORATO ET AL. 65
Figure 5. Entity-relationship scheme for central node data-
base.
possible to avoid writing specific C procedures to add a
new node in the database, making the entire database
more robust and efficient.
5. Test
A first experimental smart grid for gas metering, made
by one AP connected to the embedded PC and 5 sensor
nodes, have been tested in the laboratory achieving very
good results. The WSN has proven to be “self-learning”,
and each new node connected to smart grid has been
correctly recognized and added into the database as soon
as it has been turned on.
A massive stress test have been performed by con-
necting each sensor node to a tool able to simulate the
pulses coming from the commercial pulse generator
connected to the gas meter (Figure 6). The sampling
time has been set to 1 minute, in order to have a large
amount of data to be stored on the embedded PC of the
central node. The simulated network has been kept “ope-
rational” for almost 14 consecutive days. Each node sent
to the AP an average of 18600 values (out of the theo-
retically expected 20152). Details about data transmitted
by each node and correctly managed by the simulated
network are shown in Table 1.
Sampling interval equal to 1 minute is definitely ex-
cessive in a real context of application of the smart grid
for smart gas metering. It is more likely that each grid
node will perform a sampling operation 4 times per day
in order to allow the AP to receive 1460 packets per year.
With 20152 packets received at the end of the test, a pe-
riod of activity of the entire smart grid equal approxi-
mately to 14 years (actually 13.8 years) was estimated.
Experimental current consumption was very low in 4
out of 5 test nodes, in accordance to datasheet informa-
tion, allowing a life period of each node of almost 10
years, as decided in designing stage. The higher current
absorption of the fifth node is due to imperfections in the
realization of electronic boards (e.g. not perfect compo-
nents welding).
Figure 6. Smart grid node during the massive stress test
connected to commercial pulse generator which will be
connected to the gas meter in a real application.
Table 1. Percentage of correctly received packets from each
node and managed by the entire smar t.
Received
packets Percentage of correctly received packet
Node 1 18801 94%
Node 2 18716 93%
Node 3 18878 94%
Node 4 17748 88%
Node 5 18862 94%
Smart Grids93005 92%
6. Conclusions and Outlooks
This paper presents a new prototypal low cost smart grid
ad-hoc designed for gas metering.
All the hardware, the firmware, the software and the
solutions are ad-hoc designed and developed for this
purposes, paying particular attention to the overall cost
reduction of the custom realized electronic board, which
was designed to be compatible with the already available
commercial gas metering equipments.
The present version of the prototypal smart grid stores
into the database the number of pulses coming from the
gas meter equipments and detected by each node.
All the tests performed in laboratory show that the de-
veloped smart grid acquires information from comercial
gas meter equipments with very few errors, assuring a
good reliability of the systems.
The described network has been developed in a coope-
rative project with the Italian gas company Piceno Gas
S.R.L.. The gas company presented to the Italian Office
for Patent and Marks (Ufficio Italiano Brevetti e Marchi)
the patent application for the utility model No. TO2013-

O. RORATO ET AL. 66
U000009.
In the future a complete experimental installation of
the prototypal smart grid will be realized in order to test
the wireless sensor network in a fully operative situation.
Moreover it will also be possible to realize a specific pro-
cedure to store in the database the amount of gas con-
sumed by each user. Finally other services can be im-
plemented to improve the gas metering grid and make it
more complete and efficient.
7. Acknowledgements
The present paper represents the result of an experimen-
tal activity promoted by the local operative unit of CIN-
FAI (Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Fisica
delle Atmosfere e delle Idrosfere, www.cinfai.it) c/o
DET (Department of Electronic and Telecommunications.
www.det.polito.it) of Polytechnic of Turin, and develo-
ped in cooperation with the Italian gas company Piceno
Gas S.R.L. (www.picenogas.com).
REFERENCES
[1] C. Lucianaz, O. Rorato, M. Allegretti, M. Mamino, M.
Roggero,/ F. Diotri, “Low Cost DGPS Wireless Net-
work,” IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and
Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC), Tori-
no, 12-16 September 2011, pp. 792-795.
[2] Gabella M., R. Notarpietro, S. Bertoldo, A. Prato, C.
Lucianaz, O. Rorato, M. Allegretti and G. Perona, “A
Network of Portable, Low-Cost, X-Band Radars,” In: J.
Bech, Ed., Doppler Radar Observations—Weather Radar,
Wind Profiler, Ionospheric Radar, and Other Advanced
Applications, Intech, Rijeka, pp. 175-202.
[3] S. Bertoldo, O. Rorato, C. Lucianaz and M. Allegretti, “A
Wireless Sensor Network Ad-Hoc Designed as Anti-Theft
Alarm System for Photovoltaic Panels,” Wireless Sensor
Network, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2012, pp. 107-112.
doi:10.4236/wsn.2012.44014
[4] T. Le Sage, A. Bindel, P. Conway, L. Justham, S. Slaw-
son and A. West, “Embedded Programming and Real-
Time Signal Processing of Swimming Strokes,” Sports
Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-14.
doi:10.1007/s12283-011-0070-7
[5] M. Keshtgari and A. Deljoo, “A Wireless Sensor Network
Solution for Precision Agriculture Based on Zigbee
Technology,” Wireless Sensor Network, Vol. 4, No. 1,
2012, pp. 25-30. doi:10.4236/wsn.2012.41004
[6] B. Panajotovic, M. Jankovic and B. Odadzic, “ICT and
Smart Grid,” 10th International Conference on Tele-
communication in Modern Satellite Cable and Broadcas-
ting Services (TELSIK S), Belgrade, 5-8 October 2011, pp.
118-121. doi:10.1109/TELSKS.2011.6112018
[7] R. E. Brown, “Impact of Smart Grid on Distribution Sys-
tem Design,” Power and Energy Society General Meeting
—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the
21st Century, IEEE, Pittsburgh, 20-24 July 2008, pp. 1-4.
doi:10.1109/PES.2008.4596843
[8] M. Tewolde, J. C. Fritch and J. P. Longtin, “High-Reso-
lution Meter Reading Technique for Appliance Gas Us-
age Monitoring for the Smart Grid,” 8th International
Conference & Expo on Emerging Technologies for a
Smarter World (CEWIT), New York, 2-3 November 2011,
pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/CEWIT.2011.6135876
[9] N. Anglani, E. Bassi, F. Benzi, L. Frosini and T. Traino,
“Energy Smart Meters Integration in Favor of the End
User,” IEEE International Conference on Smart Mea-
surements for Future Grids (SMFG), Bologna, 14-16
November 2011, pp. 16-21.
doi:10.1109/SMFG.2011.6125773
[10] SoC with RF Core CC430F5135 Datasheet, Texas Instru-
ment, 2012. www.ti.com
[11] A. Sikora, P. Villalonga and K. Landwehr, “Extensions to
Wireless M-BUS Protocol for Smart Metering and Smart
Grid Application,” Proceedings of the International Con-
ference on Advances in Computing, Communications and
Informatics (ICACCI ’12), ACM, New York, pp. 399-404.
doi:10.1145/2345396.2345462
[12] K. Hariharasudhan, F. Colaianni, M. Sardo, S. Ramkumar
and N. Kochhar, “Wireless M-BUS in Smart Grid Sce-
nario,” Arrow Electronics.
http://components-asiapac.arrow.com
[13] A. Sikora and D. Lill, “Design, Simulation, and Verifica-
tion Techniques for Highly Portable and Flexible Wire-
less M-BUS Protocol Stacks,” International Journal of
Smart Grid and Clean Energy, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp.
97-102.