
Identification and Evaluation of the Effective Criteria on Customer
Satisfaction with Kitchen Worktops Product
240
However, fast delivery is of highest important among the
sub-criteria related to the delivery terms. This shows that
despite being ranked fifth in the final analysis, the most
important influential factor in the field of delivery terms is
fast delivery of the product.
4.2.6. Three Sub-Criteria with Close Weight
Color variety of veneer, quality of adhesive and adhesion
of veneer, and the quality of the product performance by
the end users) These three sub-criteria in the final analysis
through Expert Choice software weighting respectively
0/078, 0/067 and 0/065 are in the priorities sixth to eighth.
The relatively close weights of these three criteria show
the almost similar importance of these three criteria in
kitchen worktops customer satisfaction. Presenting vari-
ous colors and designs of coatings to the kitchen worktops
customers and responding to their interests will be an
important factor in satisfaction, so that among the sub-
criteria related to the technical specifications of the
product, color variety of coating is of the highest impor-
tance and consideration of this issue can have a large
impact on customer satisfaction. The quality of coating
adhesion to MDF is of highly importance considering
being vulnerable. The factor of product efficiency quality
by the end users represents the satisfaction level of the
product end users and the main kitchen worktops con-
sumer. Given that direct customers of the company are in
fact the kitchen worktops sellers to the end users, this
criterion shows their satisfaction importance.
4.2.7. The Company’s Willingness to Meet the
Customers’ Needs
This sub-criterion which is related to the company’s after
sales services, although ranked eleventh in the final syn-
thesis weighting 0/03, it is of the highest importance
among the sub-criteria related to after sales services. Thus,
this sub-criterion should be more considered in warranty
related activities. After sales services, which are of the
customer relationship management activities, have a large
impact in making the customers loyal [11].
5. Conclusion
According to studies conducted in this research, which
have identified and ranked the factors affecting kitchen
worktops customer satisfaction, it can be concluded that
in the competitive market of this product in our country,
product price and sale terms are the most important fac-
tor in the customer satisfaction. It seems that considering
that kitchen worktops manufacturing technology is the
same in most Iranian manufacturers of this product, in this
conditions, low cost price and considering other effective
factors can be influential on customer satisfaction. How-
ever, considering higher quality products in the market
with higher prices, it can be concluded that the price in-
crease which is proportionate to a rise in the quality of
other influential factors such as the quality of used raw
materials, delivery terms and technical characteristics of
the products, will be acceptable for the customers and the
competitive advantage of the product will be maintained.
REFERENCES
[1] G. Varva, “Improving Your Measurement of Customer
Satisfaction: A Guide to Creating, Conducting, Analyzing,
and Reporting Customer Satisfaction Measurement Pro-
grams,” ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, 1997.
[2] Z. Mehdi, R. Barab and Farrokh, “Designing a Model to
Measure Customer Satisfaction and Its Implementation in
the Rubber Industry,” Journal of Management, Vol. 5, No.
12, 2008, pp. 47-62.
[3] S. Sohail and M. Saeed, “Measurement of Satisfaction
Level of End Users of Rafsanjan Pistachio Company
through AHP,” Journal of Industrial Management, Facul-
ty of Humanities, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2007, pp. 37-48.
[4] F. Mahmoud, M. Moqadaseh and G. Hadi, “Weighting
and Ranking the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction
in the Automotive Industry Using Analytical Hierarchy
Process (AHP),” Culture Management, Vol. 4, No. 13,
2006, pp. 37-64.
[5] Y. J. Jeong and Y. S. Lee, “A Study on the Customer
Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty of Furniture Purchaser
in On-Line Shop,” Asian Journal on Quality, Vol. 11, No.
2, 2010, pp. 146-156.
[6] S. Ahmad and E. Amir, “Designing a Model to Measure
Customer Satisfaction in the Developmental Banking In-
dustry and Accordingly to Measure Customer Satisfaction
of Bank of Industry and Mine,” Knowledge Management,
Vol. 21, No. 21, 2008, pp. 57-74.
[7] C. K. Kwong and H. Bai, “Determining the Importance
Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a
Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach,” Journal
of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2003, pp.
367-377.
[8] L. V. Vanegas and A. W. Labib, “A Fuzzy Quality Func-
tion Deployment (FQFD) Model for Driving Optimum
Targets,” International Journal of Production Research,
Vol. 39, No. 1, 2001, pp. 99-120.
doi:10.1080/00207540010005079
[9] G. Pour and S. Hassan, “Analytical Hierarchy Process
(AHP),” Amirkabir University Publication Center, Tehran,
2000.
[10] A. M. Javad, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making,” Tehran
University Press, Tehran, 1998.
[11] T. L. Saaty, “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Pri-
ority Theory,” 2nd Edition, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh,
2000.
[12] E. Anderson, “Customer Satisfaction and Price Tolerance,”
Marketing Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1996, pp. 265-274.
doi:10.1007/BF00435742
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. IB