Food and Nutrition Sciences
 Vol. 2  No. 4 (2011) , Article ID: 5687 , 8 pages DOI:10.4236/fns.2011.24047

Effect of Caralluma Fimbriata Extract on 3T3-L1 Pre-Adipocyte Cell Division

Soundararajan Kamalakkannan1, Ramaswamy Rajendran2, Ramasamy V. Venkatesh3, Paul Clayton4, Mohammad A. Akbarsha5,6

 

1Department of Animal Science, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India; 2GreenChem, Bangalore, India; 3Gencor Pacific Limited, Discovery Bay, Hong Kong (China); 4Department of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK; 5Mahatma Gandhi-Doerenkamp Center for Alternatives, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India; 6College of Food Science and Agriculture, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Email: akbarbdu@yahoo.com

Received July 3rd, 2010; revised August 18th, 2010; accepted September 21st, 2010.

Keywords: Caralluma Fimbriata, Cell Cycle, Cyclin D1, Hyper-Plastic Obesity, Slimaluma™

ABSTRACT

A standardized extract of the plant Caralluma fimbriata (Slimaluma™) is widely used in the management of obesity but its mode of action is not yet clarified. This study investigated the ability of Caralluma fimbriata extract (CFE) to modify pre-adipocyte cell division and thus the development of hyper-plastic obesity. Mouse 3T3-L1 pre-adipocyte cell line samples were treated with different concentrations of an extract of CFE standardized against its pregnane glycoside content. Plain medium formed the negative control and hydroxyurea was the positive control. The cells were counted at 12-hour intervals, and their viability tested using the MTT assay. The treated cells were subjected to direct and indirect immunofluorescent assays for cyclin D1. CFE inhibited 3T3-L1 cell growth in a dose and duration-dependent manner, with results comparable to those produced by hydroxyurea. The viability of CFE-treated cells was reduced. Direct and indirect immunofluorescent assays demonstrated that CFE inhibits import of cyclin D1into the nucleus. CFE appears to inhibit pre-adipocyte cell division by interfering with a mechanism preceding the import of cyclin D1-CDk4/6 complex into the nucleus during the early G1 phase of the cell cycle, suggesting that CFE has the potential to inhibit hyperplastic obesity.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a critical topic in public health and preventive medicine and recognized as a 21st century pandemic [1]. Overweight and obesity increase the risk of hypertension, type-2 diabetes, CHD [1], cancer [2] and dementia [3], and reduce life expectancy [4].

With progressive weight gain there is an initial increase in adipocyte size and subsequently numbers. When existing adipocytes are replete with fat, the concerted action of extracellular signals and intrinsic transcription factors and co-activators triggers mitotic clonal expansion of fibroblastic pre-adipocytes which subsequently differentiate into immature and finally mature adipocytes [5]. Current research focuses on ways to increase lipolysis and fat oxidation, and to reduce lipogenesis, adipocyte size, and the differentiation and proliferation of pre-adipocytes [6-8].

Following weight loss, adipocyte size is reduced by lipolysis but adipocyte numbers are maintained, facilitating subsequent weight regain. Since degree of obesity is linked to adipocyte numbers, inhibiting differentiation and proliferation of pre-adipocytes is an interesting therapeutic strategy [6,7]. Botanical drugs appear promising. They may be safer (if derived from food plants) than pharmaceuticals [9-11], as evidenced by the documented pharmacology of Hoodia [12] and capsiate [13].

Caralluma fimbriata (C. fimbriata), an edible succulent belonging to the family Asclepiadaceae, grows wild in India, Africa, and Europe [14] and was cultivated in Britain as far back as 1830 [15]. Listed by the Indian Health Ministry as a vegetable and famine food, it is widely consumed as a food, appetite suppressant and treatment for diabetes [14]. A standardised extract of C. fimbriata containing pregnane and metastigmane glycosides [16] is marketed as a supplement for weight loss.  There are no reports of adverse effects [17] and an acute oral toxicity study on rats showed no toxicity at doses up to 5 g/kg (Kurpad et al., unpublished).

Appetite suppressing effects of C. fimbriata have been documented [18]. Two unpublished reports of doubleblind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials substantiate the weight reducing property of C. fimbriata. More recently, an animal study [19] showed its ability to prevent adiposity induced by a cafeteria diet. This paper reports the anti-adipogenic property of C. fimbriata in the mouse-derived 3T3-L1 pre-adipocyte cell line, an accepted model for the in vitro evaluation of anti-obesity drugs, using cytoplasmic/nuclear localization of cyclin D1 as the molecular marker [6,8,20].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. 3T3-L1 Cell Culture

3T3-L1 mouse embryo fibroblasts, obtained from the NCCS, Pune, India, were cultured as described elsewhere [21]. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere with 95% air and 5% CO2.  All experiments were carried out using cells within passage 20, in quadruplicate.

2.2. Test Material

Caralluma fimbriata extract (CFE), the aqueous fraction of a methanolic extract of the aerial parts, was obtained from GreenChem, Bangalore, India. Pregnane glycosides (the putative therapeutic compound) [22] were standardized to 25%. A stock solution of this extract was prepared at 1mg per ml concentration in culture medium and subsequently diluted in culture medium to obtain test concentrations from 20 to 500 ug/ml. Medium was the negative control, 10 ug/ml hydroxyurea (Sigma Chemical Co), a known inhibitor of cell division was the positive control.

2.3. Inhibition of 3T3-L1 Cell Growth by CFE (25%) - Cell Count

One hundred cells were seeded per well in a 12 or 24 well plate. Cells in each well were counted after 24 hr to check plating efficiency, giving the initial count. Medium was discarded and replaced with fresh medium containing the test drug at 100 to 500 μg/ml and 20 to 100 μg/ml concentrations, the positive control and the negative control. Cells were re-counted after 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr, using an inverted microscope (Axiovert, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Data for each time point and treatment were used to calculate the respective means ± standard deviations.

2.4. MTT Assay for Cell Viability

The cultured cells, treated with a single dose of the drugwere subjected to MTT assay [23]. 5000 cells were seeded per well in 96 well micro-titer plates and cultured for 24 hr. After discarding the medium, fresh medium containing negative control, positive control or the drug at 100 μg/ml concentrations was added and the cells incubated for 24 hr (8 replicates). The medium was then replaced with 20 µl of MTT (5 mg/ml). The plate was incubated for 5 - 6 hr in dark. Formazon crystals that developed were solubilized with 100 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and color intensity read in an ELSIA reader (BioRad, CA, USA) at 570 nm, with 630 nm as the reference wavelength. The data were used to calculate the respective means ± standard deviations.

2.5. Immunofluorescent Assays for Cyclin D1

Localization of cyclin D1 was carried out using mouse anti-cyclin D1 monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA, USA). Treatment procedures were the same as described for the MTT assay.

2.6. Fluorescent Microscopy

The treated cells were washed thrice with PBS (pH-7.4), fixed in 1% formalin in PBS for 2 min and air-dried. After three subsequent washes in PBS, the cells were incubated with 10 % blocking serum for 20 min and washed again in PBS. The cells were incubated for 60 min with the primary antibody for cyclin D1 [(72-13G): sc-450, mouse monoclonal antibody, dilution range 1:100] in PBS, with 1.5% blocking serum. After three washes in PBS for 5 min each, the cells were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody [goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC: sc-2010 (dilution range: 1:100-1:400)] in PBS with 1.5% - 3% normal blocking serum, in a dark chamber for 45 min. After three washes in PBS, the cells were loaded on to a cover slip, mounted in 90% glycerol in PBS and examined in a fluorescent microscope (Axioscop 2 Plus, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with appropriate filters (wavelength 450 - 490 nm).

2.7. Indirect Immunofluorescent Assay

Cells were grown in 8-well chamber slides and treated with CFE at 100 ug/ml concentration, hydroxyurea at 10 ug/ml concentration or left untreated. The cells were then fixed with 10% buffered formalin and permeabilized with chilled acetone (histological grade, EMD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The fixed cells were then blocked with goat serum and incubated with the primary antibody for cyclin D1 [(72-13G): sc-450, mouse monoclonal antibody, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, dilution range 1:100) in a humidified chamber at 37˚C. After incubation with the primary antibody, the cells were washed with PBS and conjugated with secondary antibody with the fluorescent dye Alexa Fluor 594 (red) (Molecular Probes Inc., Oregon, USA). The chambers were removed, the slides air-dried, and the nuclei stained with 4’-6-Diamidino-2- phenylindole hydrochloride (DAPI) by mounting the slide with Vecta shield mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., CA, USA). Localisation of cyclin D1 was observed in a confocal microscope using UV lasers (Leica, Jena, Germany).

2.8. Analysis of Data

All the values were expressed as the mean ± SEM and analyzed adopting one way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

3. Results

3.1. Inhibition of 3T3-L1 Cell Growth by CFE

The 3T3-L1 cells were treated with CFE at increasing concentrations from 20 to 500 μg/ml for 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr, with hydroxyurea as positive control and untreated as negative control. Negative control 3T3-L1 cells exhibited normal growth. Hydroxyurea-treated positive control cells were inhibited in division beyond 12 hr of treatment and the cell counts decreased, indicating cell death. In cells treated with CFE, cell growth was inhibited with all concentrations of the drug, in a doseand time-dependent manner. At 100 ug/ml and above, cell growth was inhibited significantly and there was a delayed but dose-related reduction in absolute cell counts, indicating cell death.

This is presented in Tables 1 and 2. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. At zero hr, there were no significant differences between and within the groups (P < 0.05); as time progressed statistically significant differences were noted between the negative and positive controls (a) and between negative control and CFE-treated groups (b) (P < 0.05) at all concentrations.

3.2. Loss of Viability of 3T3-L1 Cells on Treatment with CFEMTT Assay

Treatment of 3T3-L1 cells with CFE at 100 μg/ml concentration resulted in loss of viability of the cells and the effect was dependent on duration of treatment.

3.3. Inhibition of Nuclear Import of Cyclin-D1 by CFEDirect Immunofluorescent Assay

Cyclin D1 was immunolocalized in untreated and hydroxyureaand CFE-treated 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells using specific antibody and observed in a fluorescent microscope. In the untreated cells cyclin D1 was local-

Table 1. Inhibition of 3T3-L1 cell growth by CFE at 100 to 500 μg/ml.

Table 2. Inhibition of 3T3-L1 cell growth by CFE 20 to 100 μg/ml, as revealed in the manual cell count.

ized both in the nucleus and cytoplasm (see Figure 1). In the hydroxyurea-treated cells, cyclin D1 was mostly localized in the cytoplasm with little localization in the nucleus (see Figure 2). The result was similar in cells treated with CFE (see Figure 3).

Figure 1. The direct immunofluorescent assay for cyclin D1.

3.4. Inhibition of Nuclear Import of Cyclin D1 by CFEIndirect Immunofluorescent Assay

In order to acquire additional evidence for inhibition of nuclear import of cyclin D1 by CFE treatment, the cells were subjected to indirect immunofluorescent assay and observed in a confocal microscope. In untreated cells cyclin D1 was localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm. When DAPI pseudo-stained nuclei were overlaid the nuclei fluoresced orange, confirming nuclear localization of cyclin D1 (See Figure 4, upper panel). In hydroxyurea-treated cells most nuclei appeared empty of cyclin D1, and in the overlay most nuclei fluoresced bright red (See Figure 4, middle panel). Treatment with CFE (100 μg/ml) produced a similar result, confirming little localization of cyclin D1 in the nuclei of most cells (See Figure 4, lower panel).

4. Discussion

The initial phase of our study showed that a Caralluma fimbriata extract standardized to pregnane glycosides inhibits proliferation and at high concentrations impairs the viability of 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes. These effects are generally doseand duration-dependent and the optimal dose is at, or near, 100 μg/ml. The ability of CFE to inhibit the proliferation of pre-adipocytes is similar to the effects of other compounds on 3T3-L1 cells, such as dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) [24], conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) [25], (-)-epigallocatechin gallate [7], esculetin [8] and phenolic acids [6]. The second phase of our work revealed that CFE inhibits the import of cyclin D1

Figure 2. The direct immunofluorescent assay for cyclin D1.

Figure 3. The direct immunofluorescent assay for cyclin D1.

Figure 4. Indirect immunofluorescent assay for cyclin D1.

from the cytosol into the nucleus, thereby arresting the cell cycle at G1 phase. This is the first report of the antiadipogenic mechanism of action of C. fimbriata.

The cell cycle is a complex process driven by sequential activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) in association with regulatory subunits (cyclins) during G1-S and G2-M of the cell cycle [26]. Cyclins are proteins named after their cyclical expression and degradation through ubiquitination during the cell cycle[27]. CDKs are negatively regulated by cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) including p16 INK4A, P21CIP1, P27KIP1, etc., [28]. Members of the p21 family proteins inhibit CDK activity by forming a ternary p21 -cyclin D-CDK4 complex, whereas members of the INK4 family specifically inactivate CDK4 activity by forming a binary INK4-CDK4 complex. Within the CDK family, CDK4/6 is unique in that it is regulated by both the CIP/KIP and lNK4 families of inhibitors. This regulation provides CDK4/6 the ability to serve as integrators for the convergence of cell growth control signals from different stimulatory and inhibitory regulation pathways. This suggests that different cell growth control signals, such as terminal cell differentiation, may act on the cell cycle by regulating CDK4/6, pointing to the critical importance of CDK4/6 and the associated regulatory proteins [28].

G1 progression and S-phase transition are key events in the cell cycle; mitogenic factors input here, and there is the G1-S check point. Once this check point is passed, DNA synthesis and replication cannot be stopped. The D-type cyclins are regarded as sensors of the extracelluar matrix, which link mitogenic stimuli to events in the cell cycle [29]. CDK4/6-cyclin D complex couples extracellular growth signals with the cell cycle [28]. Cyclin D1 is an unstable protein found at high levels at G1 phase and its induction does not require de novo mRNA synthesis [30,31]. In mammalian cells CDK4 or CDK6, in combination with D-type cyclins, plays key roles in regulating G1 progression [28]. Cyclin D1 is highly expressed in several cancers [32]. Over-expression of cyclin D1 can produce oncogenic transformation of cells both in vitro and in vivo [33]. Over-expression of cyclin D1 is observed in most dividing cells particularly in a variety of carcinomas [32]. Inappropriate accumulation of cyclin D1 in the sub-cellular compartments may lead to either cell survival or cell death [33]. Liu et al. [34] suggested that cyclin D1 may be a potential therapeutic target for malignancy, leading to studies focusing on cell cycle proteins targeting, particularly, the multiple cyclin-CDK holo-enzymes or those specifically inhibiting cyclin D1-CDK4/6 [35]. The possible mechanism of inhibition of 3T3-L1 pre-adipocyte proliferation by CFE during an early phase of adipogenesis would involve either downregulation of CDK or inhibition of import of cyclin D1- CDK holo-enzyme from the cytosol into the nucleus, either through up-regulation of CKIs p16INK4a, p15INK4b, p27 and/or CDC25 via SMAD3/4 through TGF-β during the G1-S phase transition or independently of these molecules [7,27,28,36] by one or more of the compounds present in C. fimbriata, resulting in G1 arrest.

Our immunofluorescent analyses reveal that that cyclin D1 is localized both in cytosol and nucleus in the negative control pre-adipocyte cells. However, pre-adipocyte cells treated with CFE exhibited predominant cytosolic localization of cyclin D1. This indicates that CFE induces G1 arrest in the pre-adipocyte cells by preventing import of cyclin D1 into the nucleus. This implies that on treatment with CFE, CDK 4/6 is not imported from the cytosol to the nucleus. CDK4/6 phosphorylates RB (retinoblastoma tumor suppressor) protein so as to release E2F transcription factor from RB-E2F binding to facilitate the transcription of genes necessary for S-phase DNA synthesis [35]. Considering the critical role played by cyclin D1 in pre-adipocyte proliferation, recent studies have focused on developing agents to target cyclin D1 and induce G1 arrest in preadipocytes. The discoveries that pre-adipocyte cells treated with (-) epigallocatechin decreased cyclin D1 expression, which inhibited the proliferation through G1 arrest [7] and proliferation of rat mesangial cell was prevented by YC-1 (1-benzyl-3-(5’-hydroxymethyl-2’-furyl) indazole through decreased expression of cyclin D1 and CDK 4 [37] support our inference in this regard. They also suggest that CFE may have anti-cancer properties.

The results suggest that CFE merits further research and clinical development. Its ability to inhibit adipogenesis in cafeteria-fed animals [19] and weight gain in humans [18] indicates that our in vitro findings are biologically and clinically relevant, and match CFE’s ethnobotanical background.

5. Conclusions

The initial phase of our study showed that CFE standardized to pregnane glycosides inhibits proliferation and at high concentrations impairs the viability of 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes. These effects are generally doseand duration-dependent and the optimal dose is at, or near, 100μg/ml. CFE’s ability to inhibit the import of cyclin D1-CDK complex into the nucleus may be due to down-regulation of CDK 4/6 or maintenance of CKIs at default. We are investigating this, and are extending this work by studying the impact of CFE on primary mouse pre-adipocytes differentiating in culture, using pure pregnane and metastigmane glycosides.

6. Acknowledgements

The research facilities made available under the FIST program of DST, Government of India, New Delhi (No. SR/FST/LSI-112/2002) and Special Assistance ProgramDepartment Research Support (SAP-DRS) of University Grants Commission, Government of India, New Delhi (No.F.3-5/2007) to the Department of Animal Science, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India, are gratefully acknowledged.

7. Declaration of Interest

Ramaswamy Rajendran is employed by GreenChem, an industrial group that manufactures plant extracts. GreenChem supplied Caralluma fimbriata extracts used in this study. Ramasamy Venkatesh is employed by GenCor Pacific, which first developed the CFE raw material. Paul Clayton provides occasional consultancy services to GenCor Pacific. The other authors have no vested commercial or other conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. J. C. Seidell, “Epidemiology of Obesity,” Seminars in Vascular Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3- 14. doi:10.1055/s-2005-871737
  2. E. E. Calle, C. Rodriguez, K. Walker-Thurmond and M. J. Thun, “Overweight, Obesity, and Mortality from Cancer in a Prospectively Studied Cohort of US Adults,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 348, No. 17, April 2003, pp. 1625-1638. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021423
  3. M. A. Beydoun, H. A. Beydoun and Y. Wang, “Obesity and Central Obesity as Risk Factors for Incident Dementia and Its Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Obesity Reviews, Vol. 9, No. 3, May 2008, pp. 204-218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00473.x
  4. S. J. Olshansky, et al. “A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 352, No. 11, March 2005, pp. 1138-1145. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr043743
  5. Q.-Q. Tang, T. C. Otto and M. D. Lane, “Mitotic Clonal Expansion: A Synchronous Process Required for Adipogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 100, No. 1, January 2003, pp. 44-49. doi:10.1073/pnas.0137044100
  6. C.-L. Hsu, S.-L. Huang and G.-C. Yen, “Inhibitory Effect of Phenolic Acids on the Proliferation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes in Relation to Their Antioxidant Activity,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 54, No. 12, June 2006, pp. 4191-4197. doi:10.1021/jf0609882
  7. P.-F. Hung, B.-T. Wu, et al., “Antimitogenic Effect of Green Tea (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate on 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes Depends on the ERK and Cdk2 Pathways,” American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology, Vol. 288, No. 5, May 2005, pp. C1094-C1108. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00569.2004
  8. J.-Y. Yang, et al., “Esculetin Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Cells,” Obesity, Vol. 14, No. 10, October 2006, pp. 1691-1699. doi:10.1038/oby.2006.194
  9. D. Heber, “Herbal Preparations for Obesity: Are They Useful?” Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, Vol. 30, No. 2, June 2003, pp. 441-463. doi:10.1016/S0095-4543(03)00015-0
  10. M. H. Pittler, K. Schmidt and E. Ernst, “Adverse Events of herbal Food Supplements for Body Weight Reduction: Systematic Review,” Obesity Reviews, Vol. 6, No. 2, May 2005, pp. 93-111. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00169.x
  11. T. Lenz and W. Hamilton, “Supplemental Products Used for Weight Loss,” Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Vol. 44, No. 1, January-February 2004, pp. 59-67. doi:10.1331/154434504322713246
  12. D. B. MacLean and L.-G. Luo, “Increased ATP Content/Production in the Hypothalamus May be a Signal for Energy-Sensing of Satiety: Studies of the Anorectic Mechanism of a Plant Steroidal Glycoside,” Brain Research, Vol. 1020, No. 1-2, September 2004, pp. 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.041
  13. K. Ono, et al., “Intragastric Administration of Capsiate, a Transient Receptor Potential Channel Agonist, Triggers Thermogenic Sympathetic Responses,” Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 110, No. 3, March 2011, pp. 789- 798. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00128.2010
  14. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, “Wealth of India: A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products,” Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Delhi, 1985.
  15. J. C. Loudon, “Loudon’s Hortus Britannicus. A Catalogue of All the Plants, Indigenous, Cultivated in, or Introduced to Britain,” Brown and Green, London, 1830.
  16. E. Abdel-Sattar, M. R. Meselhy and M. A. Al-Yahya, “New Oxypregnane Glycosides from Caralluma Penicillata,” Planta Medica, Vol. 68, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 430-434. doi:10.1055/s-2002-32078
  17. H. Preuss, “Report on the Safety of Caralluma Fimbriata and Its Extract,” 2004. http://www.federalabs.com/analyses/Saftey%20of%20Caralluma.pdf
  18. R. Kuriyan, et al., “Effect of Caralluma Fimbriata Extract on Appetite, Food Intake and Anthropometry in Adult Indian Men and Women,” Appetite, Vol. 48, No. 3, May 2007, pp. 338-344. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.013
  19. S. Kamalakkannan, et al., “Anti-Obesogenic and Anti-Atherosclerotic Properties of Caralluma Fimbriata Extract,” 2010. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21234320
  20. C. Zhang, et al., “Effect of Emodin on Proliferation and Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocyte and FAS Activity,” Chinese Medical Journal, Vol. 115, No. 7, July 2002, pp. 1035-1038.
  21. N. Hemati, et al., “Signaling Pathways through Which Insulin Regulates CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein α (C/EPBα) Phosphorylation and Gene Expression in 3T3- -L1 Adipocytes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 272, No. 41, October 1997, pp. 25913-25919. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.41.25913
  22. F. R. van Heerden, et al., “An Appetite Suppressant from Hoodia Species,” Phytochemistry, Vol. 68, No. 20, October 2007, pp. 2545-2553. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.05.022
  23. T. Mosmann, “Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, Vol. 65, No. 1-2, December 1983, pp. 55-63. doi:10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
  24. Y. R. Lea-Currie, et al., “Dehydroepiandrosterone Reduces Proliferation and Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Vol. 248, No. 3, July 1998, pp. 497-504. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1998.8996
  25. D. L. Satory and S. B. Smith, “Conjugated Linoleic Acid Inhibits Proliferation but Stimulates Lipid Filling of Murine 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes,” Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 129, No. 1, January 1999, pp. 92-97.
  26. A. W. Murray, “Recycling the Cell Cycle: Cyclins Revisited,” Cell, Vol. 116, No. 2, January 2004, pp. 221-234. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01080-8
  27. C. A. Auld and R. F. Morrison, “Evidence for Cytosolic p27(Kip1) Ubiquitylation and Degradation during Adipocyte Hyperplasia,” Obesity, Vol. 14, No. 12, December 2006, pp. 2136-2144. doi:10.1038/oby.2006.250
  28. D. E. Phelps and Y. Xiong, “Regulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 during Adipogenesis Involves Switching of Cyclin D Subunits and Concurrent Binding of p18INK4c and p27Kip1,” Cell Growth & Differentiation, Vol. 9, No. 8, August 1998, pp. 595-610.
  29. M. A. Ciemerych, et al., “Development of Mice Expressing a Single D-Type Cyclin,” Genes & Development, Vol. 16, No. 24, December 2002, pp. 3277-3289.
  30. M. Hitomi and D. W. Stacey, “Cellular Ras and Cyclin D1 are Required during Different Cell Cycle Periods in Cycling NIH 3T3 Cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol. 19, No. 7, July 1999, pp. 4623-4632.
  31. M. De Falco, et al., “Evaluation of Cyclin D1 Expression and Its Subcellular Distribution in Mouse Tissues,” Journal of Anatomy, Vol. 205, No. 5, November 2004, pp. 405-412. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00347.x
  32. D. C. Chung, “Cyclin D1 in Human Neuroendocrine: Tumorigenesis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1014, 2004, pp. 209-217.
  33. P. Sumrejkanchanakij, et al., “Role of Cyclin D1 Cytoplasmic Sequestration in the Survival of Postmitotic Neurons,” Oncogene, Vol. 22, No. 54, November 2003, pp. 8723-8730. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206870
  34. M. C. Liu, J. L. Marshall and R. G. Pestell, “Novel Strategies in Cancer Therapeutics: Targeting Enzymes Involved in Cell Cycle Regulation and Cellular Proliferation,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, Vol. 4, No. 5, August 2004, pp. 403-424. doi:10.2174/1568009043332907
  35. S. Pelengaris and M. Khan, “DNA Replication and the Cell Cycle,” In: S. Pelengaris and M. Khan, Eds., The Molecular Biology of Cancer, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 2006.
  36. R. F. Morrison and S. R. Farmer, “Role of PPARγ in Regulating a Cascade Expression of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors, p18(INK4c) and p21(Waf1/Cip1), during Adipogenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 274, No. 24, June 1999, pp. 17088-17097. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.24.17088
  37. W.-C. Chiang, et al., “YC-1-Inhibited Proliferation of Rat Mesangial Cells through Suppression of Cyclin D1—Independent of cGMP Pathway and Partially Reversed by p38 MAPK Inhibitor,” European Journal of Pharmacology, Vol. 517, No. 1-2, July 2005, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.04.046

Journal Menu >>