Share This Article:

Teachers’ Attitudes and Perceptions: Association of Teachers’ Attitudes toward Traditional and Modern Teaching Methodology According to RWCT as Well as Teachers’ Perceptions for Teaching as a Profession

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:252KB) PP. 623-630
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.66061    3,271 Downloads   4,373 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Teaching methodologies that are chosen to be used by teachers in their daily work are highly impacted by their attitudes and perceptions. According to Schoenfeld (1992) attitudes and perceptions influence teachers not only how, but what, he or she teaches. The data collection for this study was conducted using quantitative and qualitative method. There were 473 school teachers throughout Kosovo that participated in this study. Questionnaires were used to collect all quantitative data, which were compiled and adjusted in accordance with the study objectives. Focus groups discussions were conducted for the purpose of collecting the qualitative data. The data showed significant negative association between teachers’ attitudes toward traditional teaching methodologies and modern teaching methodologies according to RWCT (r = 0.446, sig = 0.000). The data also showed that there was a significant negative association between attitudes toward traditional teaching methodology and teachers’ perceptions for teaching as a profession (r = 0.092, sig = 0.046). The quantitative results were in the same line with the qualitative findings of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Karanezi, X. and Rapti, E. (2015) Teachers’ Attitudes and Perceptions: Association of Teachers’ Attitudes toward Traditional and Modern Teaching Methodology According to RWCT as Well as Teachers’ Perceptions for Teaching as a Profession. Creative Education, 6, 623-630. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.66061.

References

[1] American Institute for Research (2001). The 2000-2001 Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Project Impact and Institutionalization Study. New York: OSI.
[2] Barnyak, N. C., & Paquette, K. (2010). An Investigation of Elementary Preservice Teachers Reading Instruction Beliefs. Reading Improvement. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
[3] Covac, M., & Cretu, N. (2010). Critical Thinking Program Review. OSI.
[4] Crawford, A., Saul, W., Mathews, S., & Makinster, J. (2005). Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classrooms. New York: The International Debate Education Association.
[5] Demant, M. S., & Yates, G. C. (2003). Primary Teachers’ Attitudes toward Direct Instruction Construct. Educational Psychology, 23, 483-489.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000123741
[6] Kher, N., & Burrill, G. (2005). PD3-PCMI and Districts Partner to Design Professional Development: Implementation Challenges and Evaluation Design. National Science Foundation’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Evaluation Summit, Minneapolis, MN.
[7] Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[8] Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[9] LaCour, N. (2005). Becoming a Teacher. The Black Collegian Online.
http://www.blackcollegian.com/becoming-a-teacher/
[10] Maliki, A. E. (2013). Attitudes towards the Teaching Profession of Students from the Faculty of Education, Niger Delta University. International Journal of Social Science Research, 1, 11-18.
[11] Musai, B., & Wile, J. (2004). Lesson from Albania: Professional Development That Transforms Educators, Schools and Communities. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 9, 1-20.
[12] National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
[13] OECD (2009). Teaching Practices, Teachers’ Beliefs and Attitudes. In Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) (pp. 87-135). OECD Publishing.
http://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-6-en
[14] Pupovci, D., & Taylor, A. (2003). Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking. Final Evaluation Report, Prishtinë: Kosova Education Centre.
[15] Rado, P. (2013). The Evaluation of the Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Program in Kosovo. Final Evaluation Report, Prishtinë: Kosova Education Center.
[16] Richards, J. C. (2008). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[17] Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
[18] Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching. Oxford: MacMillan.
[19] Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-Group Reflections; Parallels between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63-119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8
[20] Wile, M. J., & Ulqini, L. (2003). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Eastern Europe. Proceedings of the World Bank’s International Workshop on Curricula, Textbooks, and Pedagogical Practices and the Promotion of Peace and Respect for Diversity, Washington DC, 24-25 March 2003.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.