Share This Article:

Evaluation of Tourism Status in Sustainable Rural Development by Reynard Model (Case Study: Pa Ghaleh Village, Mamasani County, Iran)

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:320KB) PP. 80-85
DOI: 10.4236/oje.2015.53008    5,623 Downloads   6,128 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The greatest service industry and income gainer throughout the world occupies a special role and position in developing geographical areas. This study attempts to use “Reynard” model to investigate the role of tourism and its effects on the development of rural settlements with emphasis on Pa Ggaleh Village, which is one of the environs in Mamasani, Iran. Due to its historical and religious attractions and natural and cultural landscapes, this village is highly significant and has the potential to become a tourism hub and attract tourists. The methodology applied in this research is cross-sectional. Tourism potentials of Pa Ghaleh village are identified and evaluated in this study. Geological maps, topographies and field data are used to evaluate the district attractions. Their tourism potentials are also evaluated and rated using Reynard model. According to the sub-criteria of rarity and historical geography, the research results indicate that scientific value has the highest rank. In other words, tourism places in Pa Ghaleh village include 72% of scientific value, 0.59% of added value and 0.57% of compound value.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Shamsoddini, A. (2015) Evaluation of Tourism Status in Sustainable Rural Development by Reynard Model (Case Study: Pa Ghaleh Village, Mamasani County, Iran). Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 80-85. doi: 10.4236/oje.2015.53008.

References

[1] Thomas, R., Pigozzi, B. and Sambrook, R. (2005) Tourist Carrying Capacity Measures: Crowding Syndrome in the Caribean. The Professional Geographer, 57, 13-20.
[2] Fennell, D.A. (1999) Ecotourism: An Introduction. Routledge Publication, London.
[3] Byrd, E., Bosley, H. and Dronberger, M. (2009) Comparisons of Stakeholder Perceptions of Tourism Impacts in Rural Eastern North Carolina. Tourism Management, 30, 693-730.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.10.021
[4] Holland, G., Burian, M. and Dixey, L. (2003) Tourism in Poor Rural Areas, Diversifying the Product and Expanding the Benefits in Rural Uganda and the Czech Republic.
[5] Butter, R. and Stephan, B. (2004) Tourism and National Park. Johan Wiley & Sons, Ltd., England, 466 p.
[6] Mahdavi, M., Ghadiri, M. and Ghahremani, N. (2000) Tourism Impacts on Rural Development: Survey from Villagers of Dare Kan and Solghan. Quarterly of Villages and Development, 11, 39-60.
[7] Pereira, P., Pereira, D., Caetano, M. and Braga, A. (2007) Geomorphosite Assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica, 62, 159-168.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-159-2007
[8] Michaeli, A.R. (2002) Tourism Planning Based on Ecological Principles. Geographical Research Magazine, 39, 21-28.
[9] Rezvani, M. (2001) Rural Tourism: Principles and Concepts. Tehran University Press, Tehran.
[10] Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L. and Scapozza, C. )2007) A Method for Assessing Scientific and Additional Value of Geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62, 148-158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-148-2007

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.