The Reproducibility of Patient Setup for Head and Neck Cancers Treated with Image-Guided and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapies Using Thermoplastic Immobilization Device

Akihiro Nakata, Kunihiko Tateoka, Kazunori Fujimoto, Yuichi Saito, Takuya Nakazawa, Tadanori Abe, Masaki Yano, Koichi Sakata

1Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan 4Radiation Therapy Research Institute, Social Medical Corporation Teishinkai, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan Department of Radiology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan Nikko Memorial Hospital, Muroran, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2013.24016                

Abstract

The reproducibility of patient setup is an important issue for head and neck cancers treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In this study, an image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) system has been used to minimize the uncertainty of patient setup while standard thermoplastic masks were used to provide adequate immobilization for the head and neck. However, they do not provide sufficient immobilization of the shoulders, which is an important requirement in comprehensive nodal irradiation. Therefore, we investigated the setup and rotational shifts in head and neck cancer patients undergoing IMRT for which this immobilization device had been used together with an IGRT system. The setup and rotational shifts of patients were analyzed using the ExacTrac X-ray 6D IGRT system. The patients were classified as having head and neck tumors in the upper or lower regions. The upper neck nodes included lymph nodal level II while the lower neck nodes included lymph nodal levels III and IV. Clinical data from 227 treatment sessions of 12 head and neck cancer patients were analyzed. The random translational error in inter-and intra-fraction errors of the anterio-posterior (AP) direction might influence the rotational errors of pitch and roll in the upper region. At the same time, the random translational error in the inter-and intra-fraction errors of the AP direction might influence the rotational error of roll in the lower region. We believe that these random translational errors should be considered during treatment. We found variability in random translational errors for different regions in the anatomy of head and neck cancer patients due to rotational shifts. Depending on the location of the primary lesion or the selected nodal treatment targets, these relative positional variations should be considered when setup and rotational shifts are corrected with IGRT systems before treatment.

Keywords

IMRT; IGRT; Radiation Therapy; Immobilization; Head and Neck Cancer

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	M. J. Zelefskya, Z. Fuksa, L. Happersettb, H. J. Lee, C. C. Ling, C. M. Buman, M. Hunt, T. Wolfe, E. S. Venkatraman, A. Jackson, M. Skwarchuk and S. A. Leibel, “Clinical Experience with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Prostate Cancer,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2000, pp. 241-249.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00100-0
[2]	A. Pirzkall, F. Lohr, A. Hoss, M. Wannenmacher, J. Debus and M. Carol, “Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Conventional Conformal Radiotherapy for Complex-Shaped Tumors,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2000, pp. 1371-1380.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00772-0
[3]	S. Tribius and C. Bergelt, “Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Conventional and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Is There a Worthwhile Quality of Life Gain?” Cancer Treatment Reviews, Vol. 37, No. 7, 2011, pp. 511-519.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.01.004
[4]	B. Tomas, S. Rupert, N. Wilfried and D. E. Wazer, “Image-Guided IMRT,” Springer Verlag-Heidelberg, Berlin, 2006.
[5]	L. E. Court, L. Wolfsberger, A. M. Allen, S. James and R. B. Tishler, “Clinical Experience of the Importance of Daily Portal Imaging for Head and Neck IMRT Treatments,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2008, p. 2756.http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2756
[6]	L. Zhang, A. S. Garden, J. Lo, K. K. Ang, A. Ahamad, W. H. Morrison, D. Rosenthal, M. S. Chambers, X. R. Zhu, R. Mohan and L. Dong, “Multiple Region-of-Interest Analysis of Setup Uncertainties in Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 64, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1559-1569.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.023
[7]	M. Engelsman, S. J. Rosenthal, S. L. Michaud, J. A. Adams, R. J. Schneider, S. G. Bradley, J. B. Flanz and H. M. Kooy, “Intraand Interfractional Patient Motion for a Variety of Immobilization Devices,” Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2005, pp. 3468-3474.http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2089507
[8]	J.-Y. Jin, F.-F. Yin, S. E. Tenn, P. M. Medin and T. D. Solberg, “Use of the Brainlabexactrac X-Rays 6D System in Image-Guided Radiotherapy,” Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2008, pp. 124-134.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2008.02.005
[9]	A. Bel, R. Keus, R. Vijlbrief and J. V. Lebesque, “Set up Deviations in Wedged Pair Irradiation of Parotid Gland and Tonsillar Tumors Measured with an Electronic Portal Imaging Device,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1995, pp. 153-159.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(95)01627-S
[10]	R. Marsh, J. Balter, V. L. Evans and A. Eisbruch, “Design and Analysis of an Immobilisation and Repositioning System for Treatment of Neck Malignancies,” Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1997, pp. 293-297.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(97)00102-7
[11]	J. Y. Jin, S. Ryu, K. Faber, T. Mikkelsen, Q. Chen, S. Li and B. Movsas, “2D/3D Image Fusion for Accurate Target Localization and Evaluation of a Mask Based Stereotactic System in Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Cranial Lesions,” Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2006, pp. 4557-4566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2392605
[12]	S. A. Arrizabalaga, L. B. Gonzalez, J. V. R. Ferrando, J. P. Peidro, D. P. Meseguer and T. G. Hemandez, “Prostate Planning Treatment Volume Margin Calculation Based on the Exactrac X-Ray 6D Image-Guided System: Margins for Various Clinical Implementations,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2007, pp. 936-943.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.063
[13]	J. C. Stroom and B. J M. Heijmen, “Geometrical Uncertainties, Radiotherapy Planning Margins, and the ICRU62 Report,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2002, pp. 75-83.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00140-8
[14]	W. Thorstad, S. Hong, A. J. Hope, P. E. Lindsay, B. Haughey, J. O. Deasey and K. Chao, “Patterns of Failure in Patients Receiving Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Head and Neck Cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 63, 2005, p. S74.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.127
[15]	M. V. Herk, P. Remeijer, C. Rasch and J. V. Lebisque, “The Probability of Correct Target Dosage: Dose-Population Histograms for Deriving Treatment Margins in Radiotherapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1121-1135.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00518-6
[16]	E. Astreinidou, A. Bel and C. P. J. Raaijmakers, “Adequate Margins for Random Setup Uncertainties in Headand-Neck IMRT,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2005, pp. 938-944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.016
[17]	J. C. Stroom, H. C. J. de Boer, H. Huizinga and A. G. Visser, “Inclusion of Geometrical Uncertainties in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning by Means of Coverage Probability,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1999, pp. 905-919.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00468-4