Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus

Masaaki Maruyama, William N. Capello

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University Medical Center, Clinical Building Suite, Indianapolis, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinonoi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinonoi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan..

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2013.36050                

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate a long-term in vivo deterioration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement over time, we evaluated retrieved PMMA cement in terms of chemical elements presenting in the cement using energy dispersive analysis of X-rays; Knoop hardness; and the Young’s modulus using scanning acoustic microscopy. Materials and Methods: For mechanical evaluation, we could neglect the influences of entrapped air bubbles or blood by the use of small specimens. The study was based on thirteen cement samples (six used in the acetabulum and seven in the femur) derived from eight patients (age at revision surgery: mean 72.5, range 68 to 79). All of these samples were Simplex-P^?cement. They were functioning well at least ten years after the previous surgery. Duration until revision surgery was ranged 12 to 25 years (average, 17.4 years). The reason for revision was aseptic mechanical loosening. Twenty samples of Simplex-P^reg; cement were served by manually mixing as a control. Results: The average of the hardness of the cement was 17.0 ± 1.2 (range, 13.4-20.6). In the control, the hardness was 17.8 ± 1.5 (range, 14.0-24.6). There was no significant difference between these values. The mean of Young’s modulus of the cement was 5.61 ± 0.19 GPa (range, 5.09-6.10). In the control, the modulus was 6.04 ± 0.13 GPa (range, 5.68-6.45). Although the modulus was significantly less than that of the control, there was only 7% decrease in average between twelve and twenty-five years in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that long-term implantation and functional loading in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement.

Keywords

Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement; Biodegradation; Total Hip Arthroplasty; Retrieval Study; Knoop Hardness; Young’s Modulus

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. Charnley, “Anchorage of the Femoral Head Prosthesis to the Shaft of the Femur,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 42-B, 1960, pp. 28-30.
[2]	S. Saha and S. Pal, “Mechanical Properties of Bone Cement: A Review,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1984, pp. 435-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820180411
[3]	L. Neumann, K. G. Freund and K. H. Sorenson, “Long-Term Results of Charnley Total Hip Replacement. Review of 92 Patients at 15 to 20 Years,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 76-B, 1994, pp. 245-251.
[4]	K. R. Schulte, J. J. Callaghan, S. S. Kelley and R. C. Johnston, “The Outcome of Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cement after a Minimum Twenty-Year Follow-Up. The Results of One Surgeon,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 75-A, 1993, pp. 961-975.
[5]	B. M. Wroblewski and P. D. Siney, “Charnley Low-Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Long-Term Results,” Clinical Orthopology, Vol. 292, 1993, pp. 191-201.
[6]	W. L. Jaffe, R. M. Rose and E. L. Radin, “On the Stability of the Mechanical Properties of Self-Curing Acrylic Bone Cement,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 56-A, 1974, pp. 1711-1714.
[7]	J. T. Scales and J. M. Zarek, “Biomechanical Problems of the Original Judet Prosthesis,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 1, 1954, p. 1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4869.1007
[8]	A. J. C. Lee, R. S. M. Ling and S. S. Vangala, “The Mechanical Properties of Bone Cements,” Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2, 1977, pp. 137-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091907709160626
[9]	W. Rostoker, P. Lereim and J. O. Galante, “Effect of an in Vivo Environment on the Strength of Bone Cement,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 13, 1979, pp. 365-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820130303
[10]	U. Holz, W. Hemminger and H. Gasse, “Mechanishe Untersuchungen an Explantierten und Frischen Knochenzementen,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 91, 1979, pp. 365-370.
[11]	V. Fano, I. Ortalli and K. Pozela, “Porosity in Composite Resins,” Biomaterials, Vol. 16, 1995, pp. 1291-1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)91043-X
[12]	A. Briggs, “Acoustic Microscopy,” Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992.
[13]	K. Hasegawa, C. H. Turner, R. R. Recker, E. Wu and D. B. Burr, “Elastic Properties of Osteoporotic Bone Measured by Scanning Acoustic Microscopy,” Bone, Vol. 16, 1995, pp. 85-90.
[14]	C. H. Turner and D. B. Burr, “Basic Biomechanical Measurements of Bone: A Tutorial,” Bone, Vol. 14, 1993, pp. 595-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-K
[15]	M. Kawaguchi, T. Fukushima and K. Miyazaki, “Variables Affecting the Degradation of Dental Composite Resins. 2. SEM Investigation of Aged Composite Resin,” Dental Materials, Vol. 13, 1994, pp. 116-121.
[16]	K. F. Hughes, M. D. Ries and L. A. Pruitt, “Structural Degradation of Acrylic Bone Cements Due to in Vivo and Simulated Aging,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, Vol. 65, 2003, pp. 126-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10373
[17]	M. D. Ries, E. Young, L. Al-Marashi, P. Goldstein, A. Hetherington, T. Petrie and L. Pruitt, “In Vivo Behavior of Acrylic Bone Cement in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Biomaterials, Vol. 27, 2006, pp. 256-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.103
[18]	H. Oonishi, H. Akiyama, M. Takemoto, T. Kawai, K. Yamamoto, T. Yamamuro, H. Oonishi and T. Nakamura, “The Long-Term in Vivo Behavior of Polymethyl Methacrylate Bone Cement in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 82, 2011, pp. 553-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.625538
[19]	J. R. de Wijn, T. J. J. H. Sloff and F. C. M. Driessens, “Characterization of Bone Cement,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, Vol. 46, 1975, pp. 38-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453677508989190
[20]	T. A. Gruen, K. L. Markolf and H. C. Amstutz, “Effects of Laminations and Blood Entrapment on the Strength of Acrylic Bone Cement,” Clinical Orthopaedics, Vol. 119, 1976, pp. 250-255.
[21]	N. J. Holm, “The Modulus of Elasticity and Flexural Strength of Some Acrylic Bone Cements,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, Vol. 48, 1977, pp. 436-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453677708989727
[22]	“Standard Specification for Acrylic Bone Cement,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, F451-95, Philadelphia.
[23]	“Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials [Metric],” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D790M-86, Philadelphia.
[24]	H. Onose, H. Sano, H. Kanto, S. Ando and T. Hasuike, “Selected Curing Characteristics of Light-Activated Composite Resins,” Dental Materials, Vol. 1, 1985, pp. 48-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80024-5
[25]	M. F. Ashby and D. R. H. Jones, “Engineering Materials 1: An Introduction to Their Properties and Applications,” Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, Seoul, Tokyo, 1993.
[26]	A. J. C. Lee, R. S. M. Ling and J. D. Wrighton, “Some Properties of Polymethylmethacrylate with Reference to Its Use in Orthopaedic Surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics, Vol. 95, 1973, pp. 281-287.
[27]	A. J. C. Lee and R. S. M. Ling, “Further Studies of Monomer Loss by Evaporation during the Preparation of Acrylic Cement for Use in Orthopaedic Surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics, Vol. 106, 1975, pp. 122-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197501000-00017
[28]	R. P. Kusy, “Characterization of Self-Curing Acrylic Bone Cements,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 12, 1978, pp. 271-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820120304
[29]	Y. Oshida, A. Hashem and R. Elsalawy, “Some Mechanistic Observation on Water-Deteriorated Dental Composite Resins,” Biomedical Materials and Engineering, Vol. 5, 1995, pp. 93-115.