Cairne Arabic Syllable Structure though Different Phonological Theories

Rajaa Aquil

School of Modern Languages, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2013.33034                

Abstract

Since the times of the old Arab grammarians, the syllable has played a major role in the phonology of classical as well as colloquial Arabic. In the 1970s, phonologists investigated Cairene Arabic (CA) syllable structure and found it to be the domain of some phonological processes, such as emphatic spread, CVC syllables light word final but heavy word internally, limitations on consonant clusters in certain positions of a word, and epenthesis of a vowel to break consonant clusters if there happen to be more than two consonants in word concatenation. This paper discusses some CA phonological phenomena investigated through different theories in generative phonology, i.e. rule based, autosegmental and Optimality Theory (OT). An overview of early theories is given. Early generative theories contributed substantially to the theory of the syllable of CA; however, each theory was able to explain a given phonological phenomenon. It is through the generative Optimality Theoretic approach that more than one phenomenon can be described and analyzed. The paper’s aim is not to compare between the different theories, but to describe the progression CA syllable structure analysis took in generative phonology. Unlike earlier research which based conclusions on some CA words mixed with some other classical Arabic words pronounced by CA native speakers, this paper presents an Optimality Theoretic analysis that is based on uniquely CA phonetic outputs. The analysis finds that some syllable structure constraints are high ranked and inviolable such as ONSET, and *[μ μ μ]σ. The study also shows that OT analysis can illustrate and explain in one representation, i.e. tableau two different phonological phenomena, insertion and deletion of a vowel in consonant clusters, despite their relatedness to separate prosodic domains, the syllable, the prosodic word, and the phrase. This is carried out by analyzing the ranking, relationship and interaction between the following constraints, ONSET MAX-IO, *[μ μ μ], *COMPLEX CODA, DEP-IO >> NOCODA, *APPENDIX; -*V,+hi]$:, ALIGNR (σ, PrWd), and LINEARITY. The study analyzes data that is mainly from Cairene spoken Arabic, attempting to fill a gap created by one of the contentious issues related to studies of the phonology of CA, and that is mixing between colloquial Cairene and classical Arabic.

Keywords

Cairene Arabic Syllable Structure; Optimality Theory; Consonant Clusters; Epenthesis; Deletion; Colloquial Cairene Spoken Arabic

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Abu-Mansour, M. H. (1991). Epenthesis in Makkan Arabic: Unsyllabi fied consonants vs. degenerate syllables. John Benjamins.
[2]	Aljarah, R. (2008). Cairene Arabic word stress: A constraint-based ana lysis. Dirasat. Human and Social Sciences, 35, 1-13.
[3]	Aquil, R. (2012a). L1 shapes L2 auditory representation: Elicited imita tion of Arabic speaking learners of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature (IJALEL), 1, 39-63.
[4]	Aquil, R. (2012b). Optimality theoretic representation of stress in Cai rene Arabic. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics (OJML), 12.
[5]	Badawi, E.-S., & Hinds, M. (1986). A dictionary of Egyptian Arabic. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.
[6]	Bird, S., & Blackburn, B. (1990). A logical approach to Arabic phono logy. Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
[7]	Broselow, E. (1976). The phonology of Egyptian Arabic. Ph.D. Disser tation. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
[8]	Broselow, E. (1979). Cairene Arabic syllable structure. Linguistic Ana lysis, 5, 345-382.
[9]	Broselow, E. (1988). Prosodic phonology and the acquisition of a sec ond language. In S. Flynn, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 295-308). Kluwer: Kluwer Acade mic Press. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_16
[10]	Brustad, K. (2000). The syntax of spoken Arabic: A comparative study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian and Kuwaiti dialects. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
[11]	Davis, S., & Zawaydeh, B. A. (1997). Output configuration in phonolo gy: Epenthesis and syncope in Cairene Arabic. In S. Davis (Ed.), Op timal viewpoints: In celebration of the 30th Anniversary of the Indi ana University Linguistics Club (pp. 45-77). Bloomington, IA: Indi ana University Linguistics Club Publications.
[12]	De Lacy, P. (1998). Sympathetic stress. roa.rutgers.edu/files/294-0199/294-0199-LACY-0-0.pdf
[13]	ElSaaran, M. (1951). A critical study of the phonetic observations of the Arab Grammarians. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, SOAS, London: Uni versity of London.
[14]	Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
[15]	Halle, M., & Vergnaud, J. R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[16]	Harrell, R. S. (1957). The phonology of colloquial Egyptian Arabic. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.
[17]	Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[18]	Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: structures, functions, and varieties. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
[19]	Ito, J. (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral Disserta tion, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
[20]	Ito, J. (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 217-259. doi:10.1007/BF00138077
[21]	Kay, M. (1987). Non-concatenative finite-state morphology. Proceed ings of the 3rd Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.3115/976858.976860
[22]	Kenstowicz, M. J. (1980). Notes on Cairene Arabic syncope. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 10, 39-53.
[23]	Kiprasky, P. (2003). Syllables and moras in Arabic. In C. Fery, & R. V. D. Vijver (Eds.), The syllable in optimality theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511497926.007
[24]	Mahfoudhi, A. (2005). Moriac syllable structure and edge effects. In M. Alhawary, & E. Benmamoun (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguis tics (pp. 27-48). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publish ing Company.
[25]	Maling, J. M. (1973). The theory of Classical Arabic metrics. Unpub lished Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
[26]	McCarthy, J. (1979). On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 443-466.
[27]	McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morpholo gy. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 373-413.
[28]	McCarthy, J. (2008a). Doing optimality theory: Applying theory to data. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9781444301182
[29]	McCarthy, J. (2008b). Ther serial interaction of stress and syncope. Na tural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 499-546. doi:10.1007/s11049-008-9051-3
[30]	McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1993). Generalized alignment. In G. E. Booij, & J. V. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 209-153). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4
[31]	McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative iden tiry. UMOP, 18, 249-384.
[32]	Mitchell, T. F. (1956). An introduction to Egyptian coloquial Arabic New York: Oxford University Press.
[33]	Mitchell, T. F. (1960). Prominence and syllabification in Arabic. Bulle tin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 23, 396-389.
[34]	Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrech-Hol land/Riverton: Foris Publications.
[35]	Prince, A. (1989). Metrical forms. In P. Kiparsky, & G. Youmans (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Rhythm and meter (pp. 45-80). New York: Academic.
[36]	Prince, A. (2002). Arguing optimality. In A. Carpenter, A. Coetzee, & P. d. Lacy (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 26: Papers in Optimality Theory II (pp. 269-304). Am herst, MA: GLSA Publications.
[37]	Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint in teraction in generative grammar. University of Colorado (CU-CS 696-93). Boulder, Colorado.
[38]	Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality theory: Constraint in teraction in generative grammar (Revised edition ed.). Malden: MA: Blackwell.
[39]	Selkirk, E. (1981). Epenthesis and degenerate syllables in Cairene Ara bic. Mit Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 209-232.
[40]	Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In H. V. d. Hulst, & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations: Part 2 (pp. 337-384). Dordrecht: Foris.
[41]	Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[42]	Vaux, B. (2004). The appendix. Paper presented at the Symposium on phonological theory: Representations and architecture, CUNY.
[43]	Watson, J. C. E. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[44]	Welden, A. (1980). Stress in Cairo Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sci ences, 10, 99-120.
[45]	Youssef, A., & Mazurkewich, I. (1998). The acquisition of English me trical parameters and syllable structure by adult native speakers of Egyptian Arabic (Cairene Dialect). In S. Flynn, G. Mortahardjono, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisi tion. Mahwah.