Estimating the impact of antenatal care visits on institutional delivery in India: A propensity score matching analysis

Priyanka Dixit, Laxmi Kant Dwivedi, Faujdar Ram

Department of Mathematical Demography & Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2013.55114                

Abstract

Literature asserts that prenatal care is an imperative factor for subsequent health care utilization. However, in the Indian settings presence of selection bias while determining the impact of ANC visits on institutional delivery has been overlooked by the researchers. Therefore this paper aims to examine the net impact of ANC visits on subsequent utilization of institutional delivery after removing the presence of selection bias using recent round of National Family Health survey data. The analysis has been carried out in two separate models, in the first model 1-2 ANC visits been compared with no visit and in the second model three or more antenatal care visits with no visit. The propensity score matching analysis used in this study sheds new light into this line of research which provides an effective strategy for controlling the confounding influence of institutional delivery. Employing the propensity score matching estimation approach we found women who made 1-2 ANC visits had 6.6 percent higher chance to deliver in an institution compared to women who made no visit. In addition, if a woman visited health centre three or more than three times, her chances were 31 percent higher to deliver in an institution. Result based on sensitivity analysis suggests that selection bias on unobserved covariates would have to be around 40 percent to alter the impact of 1-2 ANC visits. Findings suggest that interventions which plan to increase institutional delivery should target pregnant women who come for ANC checkups at institution first time, and health workers should encourage women to return to the health centre for more numbers of visits, as our results indicate that three or more ANC visits significantly change the women’s attitudes towards institutional delivery.

Keywords

Antenatal Care; Institutional Delivery; Selection Bias, Matching Analysis; India

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Lim, S.S., Dandona, L., Hoisington, J.A., et al. (2010) India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, A conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: An impact evaluation. Lancet, 375, 2009-2023. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60744-1
[2]	Titaley, C.R., Dibley, M.J. and Roberts, C.L. (2011) Type of delivery attendant, place of delivery and risk of early neonatal mortality: Analyses of the 1994-2007 Indonesia demographic and health surveys. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 405-416.
[3]	Koblinsky, M., Campbell, O. and Heichelheim, J. (1999) Organizing delivery care—What works for safe-motherhood? Bulletin of World Health Organization, 77, 399406.
[4]	Graham, W.J., Bell, J.S. and Bullough, C.H.W. (2000) Can skilled attendance at delivery reduce maternal mortality in developing countries? Studies in Health Services Organization and Policy, 17, 97-130.
[5]	Freedman, L.P., Graham, W.J., Brazier, E., et al. (2007) Practical lessons from global safe motherhood initiatives: Time for a new focus on implementation. Lancet, 370, 1383-1391. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61581-5
[6]	IIPS, ORC MACRO (2007) National family health survey, 2007-2008. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai.
[7]	Sugathan, K.S., Mishra. V. and Retherford, R.D. (2001) Promoting institutional delivery in India: Role of antenatal care services. National family health survey. Subject Report, International Institute for Population Sciences and East West Centre, Honolulu.
[8]	Kesterton, A.J., Cleland, J., Sloggett, A. et al. (2010) Institutional delivery in rural India: The relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 30. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-30
[9]	Agha, S. and Carton, T.W. (2011) Determinants of institutional delivery in rural Jhang, Pakistan. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-10-31
[10]	Bloom, S.S., Wypij, D. and Das, G.M. (1999) Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography, 38, 67-78. doi:10.1353/dem.2001.0001
[11]	Mishra, V. and Retherfort, R.D. (2006) The effect of antenatal care on professional assistance at delivery in rural India. Demographic and Health Research, 28. http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/WP28/WP28.pdf
[12]	Mishra, V. and Retherfort, R.D. (2008) The effect of antenatal care on professional assistance at delivery in rural India. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 307- 320. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9064-3
[13]	Ram, F. and Singh, A. (2006) Is antenatal care effective in improving maternal health in rural uttar pradesh? Evidence from a district level household survey. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 38, 433-448. doi:10.1017/S0021932005026453
[14]	Dwivedi, L.K. and Reshmi, R.S. (2009) Role of antenatal care in utilizing maternal health care services in Maharashtra. In: Singh, K.K., Yadava, R.C. and Pandey, A., Eds., Population, Poverty & Health, Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, 207-216.
[15]	Lee, S.H. (2005) Demand for immunization, parental selection, and child survival: Evidence from rural India. Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 171-197. doi:10.1007/s11150-005-0709-x
[16]	Holland, P.W. (1986) Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistics Association, 81, 945-960. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354
[17]	Statacorp (2007) Stata statistical software: Release 10. Statacorp LP, College Station, TX.
[18]	Babalola, S. and Vonrasek, C. (2005) Communication, ideation and contraceptive use in Burkina Faso: An application of the propensity score matching method. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 31, 207-212. doi:10.1783/1471189054484022
[19]	Yanovitzky, I., Zanutto, E. and Hornik, R. (2005) Estimating causal effects of public health education campaigns using propensity score methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 209-220. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.01.004
[20]	Kincaid, D.L. and Do, M. (2006) Multivariate causal attribution and cost-effectiveness of a national mass media campaign in the Philippines. Journal of Health Communicatio, 11, 69-90. doi:10.1080/10810730600974522
[21]	Conniffe, D., Vanessa, G. & Philip, J.O. (2000) Evaluating state programmes: “Natural experiments” and propensity scores. The Economic and Social Review, 31, 283- 308.
[22]	Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
[23]	Heckman, J.J., LaLonde, R.J., et al. (2000) The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In: Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D., Eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1865-2097.
[24]	Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002) Observational studies. 2nd Edition, Springer, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2
[25]	Dohoon, L. (2010) The early socioeconomic effects of teenage childbearing: A propensity score matching approach. Demographic Research, 23, 697-736. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.25
[26]	Lechner, M. (2002) Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 165, 59-82. doi:10.1111/1467-985X.0asp2
[27]	Hotchkiss, D.R., Magnani, R.J., Rous, J., et al. (1999) The effects of maternal-child health service utilization on subsequent contraceptive use in Morocco. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31, 145-165. doi:10.1017/S0021932099001455
[28]	Zerai, A. and Tsui, A.O. (2001) The relationship between prenatal care and subsequent modern contraceptive use in Bolivia, Egypt and Thailand. The African Journal of Reproductive Health, 5, 68-82. doi:10.2307/3583432
[29]	United Nation (2010) The millennium development goals report. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/statistics/mdg-2010.shtml