A TSK-Type Recurrent Neuro-Fuzzy Systems for Fault Prognosis

Rafik Mahdaoui, Leila Hayet Mouss

Centre Universitaire Khenchela, Khen- chela, Algérie.
Laboratoire d’Automatique et Productique (LAP), Université de Batna, Batna, Algérie.

DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2012.57055                

Abstract

As a result from the demanding of process safety, reliability and environmental constraints, a called of fault detection and diagnosis system become more and more important. In this article some basic aspects of TSK (Takigi Sugeno Kang) neuro-fuzzy techniques for the prognosis and diagnosis of manufacturing systems are presented. In particular, a neuro-fuzzy model that can be used for the identification and the simulation of faults prognosis models is described. The presented model is motivated by a cooperative neuro-fuzzy approach based on a vectorized recurrent neural network architecture. The neuro-fuzzy architecture maps the residuals into two classes: a one of fixed direction residuals and another one of faults belonging to rotary kiln.

Keywords

TSK Neuro-Fuzzy Systems; Faults Diagnosis; Fault Prognosis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	R. J. Patton, P. M. Frank and R. N. Clark, “Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems,” Springer, London, 2000.
[2]	L. Marinai, “Gas Path Diagnostics and Prognostics for Aero-Engines Using Fuzzy Logic and Time Series Analysis,” Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering, Canfield University, Canfield, 2004.
[3]	J. M. Koscielny and M. Syfert, “Fuzzy Logic Applications to Diagnostics of Industrial Processes,” Preprints of the 5th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes, Washington, 9-11 June 2003, pp. 771-776.
[4]	C.-F. Juang, “A TSK-Type Recurrent Fuzzy Network for Dynamic Systems Processing by Neural Network and Genetic Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2002, pp. 155-170. doi:10.1109/91.995118
[5]	C. D. Bocaniala and J. Sa da Costa, “Tuning the Parameters of a Fuzzy Classifier for Fault Diagnosis. Hill-Climbing vs Genetic Algorithms,” Proceedings of the 6th Portuguese Conference on Automatic Control, Faro, 7-9 June 2004, pp. 349-354.
[6]	J. He, “Neuro-Fuzzy Based Fault Diagnosisf or Nonlinear Processes,” Ph.D. Thesis, The University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, 2006.
[7]	F. J. Uppal and R. J Patton, “Fault Diagnosis of an Electro-pneumatic Valve Actuator Using Neural Networks with Fuzzy Capabilities,” 2002.
[8]	C. D. Bocaniala, J. Sa da Costa and V. Palade, “A Novel Fuzzy Classification Solution for Fault Diagnosis,” International Journal of Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3-4, 2004, pp. 195-206.
[9]	K. B. Ariffin, “On Neuro-Fuzzy Applications for Automatic Control, Supervision, and Fault Diagnosis for Water Treatment Plant,” Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering Universiti, Teknologi, 2007.
[10]	D. Henry, X. Olive and E. Bornschlegl, “A Model-Based Solution for Fault Diagnosis of Thruster Faults: Application to the Rendezvous Phase of the Mars Sample Return Mission,” European Conference for Aero-Space Sciences, St. Petersburg, 4-8 July 2011.
[11]	F. Xi, Q. Sun and G. Krishnappa, “Bearing Diagnostics Based on Pattern Recognition of Statistical Parameters. Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000, pp. 375-392. doi:10.1177/107754630000600303
[12]	J. Biteus, “Distributed Diagnosisand Simulation Based Residualgenerators,” Ph.D. Thesis, Vehicular SystemsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Linkopings Universitet, Linkoping, 2005.