Thinking about Physicalism

Ricardo Restrepo

Escuela de Constitucionalismo y Derecho, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales, Quito, Ecuador.

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.22012                

Abstract

Physicalism, if it is to be a significant thesis, should differentiate itself from key metaphysical contenders which endorse the existence of platonic entities, emergent properties, Cartesian souls, angels, and God. Physicalism can never be true in worlds where things of these kinds exist. David Papineau, David Spurrett, and Barbara Montero have recently developed and defended two influential conceptions of physicalism. One is derived from a conception of the physical as the non-mentally-and-non-biologically identifiable. The other is derived from a conception of the physical as the non-sui-generis-mental. The paper looks at the resources available to those conceptions, but argues that each is insufficient to yield a conception of physicalism that differentiates it from key anti-physicalist positions. According to these conceptions, if we lived in a world full of things that clearly cannot be physical, we would still live in a physical world. Thus, such conceptions of physicalism are of little theoretical interest.

Keywords

Physicalism; Papineau; Consciousness; Mental; Causal Closure

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Balaguer, M. (2009). Platonism in metaphysics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. URL (last checked 20 April 2011). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/platonism/
[2]	Broad, C. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. London: Kegan Paul.
[3]	Cartwright, N. (2010). Natural laws and the closure of physics. In R. Y. Chiao, M. L. Cohen, A. J. Leggett, W. D. Phillips, & C. L. Harper Jr. (Eds.), Visions of discovery: New light on physics, cosmology, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4]	Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5]	Gillet, C., & Witmer, G. (2001). A physical need: Physicalism and the via negativa. Analysis, 61, 302-309. doi:10.1093/analys/61.4.302
[6]	Hempel, C. (1980). Comments on Goodman’s Ways of Worldmaking. Synthese, 45, 193-199. doi:10.1007/BF00413558
[7]	Jackson, F. (1986). What Mary did not know. Journal of Philosophy, 83, 291-295. doi:10.2307/2026143
[8]	Jackson, F. (1994). Finding the mind in the natural world. In N. Block, G. Güzeldere, & O. Flanagan (Eds.), The nature of consciousness: Philosophical debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[9]	Jackson, F. (2006). On ensuring that physicalism is not a dual attribute theory in sheep’s clothing. Philosophical Studies, 131, 227-249. doi:10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3
[10]	Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[11]	McLaughlin, B. (1992). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In A. Beckermann et al. (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110870084.49
[12]	Mermin, D. (1985). Is the moon really there when nobody looks? Reality and quantum theory. Physics Today, 38, 38-47. doi:10.1063/1.880968
[13]	Montero, B., & Papineau, D. (2005). A defence of the via negativa for physicalism. Analysis, 65, 233-237. doi:10.1093/analys/65.3.233
[14]	Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435-450. doi:10.2307/2183914
[15]	Papineau, D. (2002). Thinking about consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199243824.001.0001
[16]	Pereboom, D. (2002). Robust nonreductive materialism. Journal of Philosophy, 99, 499-531. doi:10.2307/3655563
[17]	Smart, J. J. C. (1962). Sensations and brain processes. In V. C. Chappell (Ed.), The philosophy of mind. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[18]	Spurrett, D., & Papineau, D. (1999). A note on the completeness of “physics”. Analysis, 59, 25-29. doi:10.1093/analys/59.1.25
[19]	Stairs, A. (1990). Quantum mechanics, mind and self. In D. Kolak, & R. Martin (Eds.), Self and identity. New York: MacMillan.
[20]	Stoljar, D. (2009). Physicalism. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. URL (last checked 20 April 2011). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/#8
[21]	Yablo, S. (1990). The real distinction between mind and body. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary, 16, 149-201.