"
Efficacy and safety of oral solution dosed misoprostol versus misoprostol vaginally in labour induction"
written by Longinos Aceituno Velasco, María Teresa Sánchez Barroso, María Huertas Segura García, Valois González Acosta, Ramón de la Fuente Pedrosa, Ana Barqueros Ramírez, Luis Delgado Martínez, Encarna Ruiz Martínez,
published by
Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vol.3 No.9, 2013
has been cited by the following article(s):
|
[1]
|
Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly
Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research,
2021
DOI:10.18231/j.ijogr.2021.019
|
|
|
|
|
[2]
|
Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
2021
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD014484
|
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
2021
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD014484
|
|
|
|
|
[4]
|
Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,
2019
DOI:10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3
|
|
|
|