Differential Response of Biomass Production and Nitrogen Uptake of Vegetable Amaranth to Two Types of Poultry Manure from Nigeria and Canada

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 319KB)  PP. 694-711  
DOI: 10.4236/fns.2019.106051    662 Downloads   1,584 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Amaranthus cruentus is one of the sixty Amaranthus species of world. It is widely grown as a green leafy vegetable and for its grain in many tropical countries of Africa, Central and South American, Canada, Mexico and parts of Asia. Depleted soil fertility under intensive cultivation is a major limitation to production of the vegetable. The study investigated the effects of two types of poultry manure on biomass yield and nutrient uptake of Amaranth cruentus in a greenhouse at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada in 2011. The experiment was a 2 × 3 × 3 factorial arranged into a Randomized Completely Block Design and replicated three times. The factors were two soil types, two sources of poultry manure and urea, and N rates at 0, 60 and 120 kgNha1. Nitrogen uptake by the plants that treated with poultry manure from Canada (PMC) and Urea was 172.5 vs. 171.4 mgpot1 and 169.5 vs. 163.7 mgpot1 respectively which were significantly greater than the poultry manure from Nigeria (PMN), 100.6 mgpot1 and 110.0 mgpot1 for Red River and Glenhope soil series, respectively. Nitrogen uptake was similar at the N rates of 60 and 120 kgNha1 (140.7 vs. 155.6 mgpot1) in the Red River soil, while N uptake at 120 kgNha1 was greater than at 60 kgNha1 in Glenhope soil. Shoot dry matter of the vegetable grown in soils treated with PMC and urea was significantly greater than from PMN in Red River soil (10.1, 9.6 and 6.7 gpot1) and in Glenhope soil (8.8, 8.1 and 6.4 gpot1). Phosphorus, K, Ca and Mg uptake at 60 and 120 kg

Share and Cite:

Olatoberu, F. , Idowu, M. , Adepetu, J. and Akinremi, O. (2019) Differential Response of Biomass Production and Nitrogen Uptake of Vegetable Amaranth to Two Types of Poultry Manure from Nigeria and Canada. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 10, 694-711. doi: 10.4236/fns.2019.106051.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.