The Politics of Data:Uncovering Whiteness in Conventional Social Policy and Social Work Research
Ann Curry-Stevens, Amanda Cross-Hemmer, Nichole Maher, Julia Meier
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2011.14024   PDF    HTML     6,530 Downloads   13,135 Views   Citations


The implementation of a robust community based participatory research (CBPR) study in Multnomah County, Oregon, has detailed broad and deep racial disparities across 27 institutions and systems. The process of this research has led to the identification of numerous practices that misrepresent and negate the experiences and very identity of communities of color. The research draws from engagement with numerous databases from the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and various administrative databases. The core issues at hand are population undercounts, understudy of the unique characteristics of these communities, inaccuracies in how data are codified and analyzed, and data collection efforts that are infused with white centrism and a colorblindness that renders issues minimized and the experiences of communities of color obscured. Collectively, we analyze this experience to suggest that much conventional policy research while wrapped in a cloak of objectivity is in fact a reproduction of whiteness that renders communities of color invisible, marginalized and misunderstood. The impact of these practices is to extend whiteness into the arena of policy research, and correspondingly extend dynamics of oppression and white centrism. The paper profiles each area of the policy research process that reflects and reinscribes whiteness and concludes with an articulation the reach of such conventional practice and outlines an avenue to reduce the influence of whiteness.

Share and Cite:

Curry-Stevens, A. , Cross-Hemmer, A. , Maher, N. & Meier, J. (2011). The Politics of Data:Uncovering Whiteness in Conventional Social Policy and Social Work Research. Sociology Mind, 1, 183-191. doi: 10.4236/sm.2011.14024.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Alcoff, L. (2000). Is latina/o identity a racial identity? In J. Gracia, & P. DeGreiff (Eds.) Hispanics/latinos in the U.S.: Ethnicity, race and rights (pp. 23-44). New York: Routledge Press.
[2] Baines, D. (2007). Doing anti-oppressive practice: Building transformative politicized social work. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
[3] Bell, J., & Ridolfi, L. (2008). Adoration of the question: Reflections on the failure to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. San Francisco, CA: W. Haywood Burns Institute.
[4] Brown, L., & Strega, S. (2005). Research as resistance. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars Press International.
[5] Buery, R. (1998). GOP census politics. The Nation, 267, 6-7.
[6] Cahn, K., Miller, K., Bender, R., Cross-Hemmer, A., Feyerherm, B., & White, J. (2009). What we know about racial disproportionality and disparity in Oregon’s child welfare system: Decision point analysis quantitative report. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
[7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States. Vital and Health Statistics, 2, 1-32.
[8] Curry-Stevens, A., Cross-Hemmer, A., & Coalition of Communities of Color (2010). Communities of color in Multnomah County: An unsettling profile. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
[9] Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (1997). Critical white studies: Looking behind the mirror. Philadelphia, PA: Temple.
[10] Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
[11] Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. In N. Fraser, & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 7-109). New York: Verso.
[12] Frost, F., & Shy, K. (1980). Racial differences between linked birth and infant death records in Washington State. American Journal of Public Health, 70, 974-976. doi:10.2105/AJPH.70.9.974
[13] Gracia, J., (Ed.) (2007). Race or ethnicity? On Black and Latino identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
[14] Gracia, J., & Greiff, P. (Eds.) (2000). Hispanics/Latinos in the United States: Ethnicity, race and rights. New York: Routledge
[15] Har, J. (2010). Minority program helps whites. Oregonian, 6 January, p. B1.
[16] Humes, K., & Hogan, H. (2009). Measurement of race and ethnicity in a changing, multicultural America. Race and Social Problems, 1, 111-131. doi:10.1007/s12552-009-9011-5
[17] Kiviat, B. (2010). Should the Census be asking people if they are negro? New York: Time Magazine.,8599,1955923,00.html
[18] Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1994). I’ve known rivers: Lives of loss and liberation. New York: Addison-Wesley.
[19] McFadden K., & McShane L. (2010). Use of word Negro on 2010 census forms raises memories of Jim Crow. New York: New York Daily News. jim_crow.html
[20] Mullaly, B. (2002). Challenging oppression: A critical social work approach. Don Mills, ON: Oxford.
[21] National Economic Consulting (2001). Effect of census 2000 undercount on federal funding to states and selected counties, 2002-2012. Washington, DC: Price Waterhouse Coopers.
[22] Navarro, M. (2003). Going beyond black and white, Hispanics in Census pick “other.” In P. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class and gender in the United States (pp. 214-218). New York: Worth.
[23] Oregon Department of Education (2010). 2008 Oregon kindergarten readiness survey report: Readiness to learn. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Education.
[24] Reamer, A., & Carpenter, R. (2010). Counting for dollars: The role of the decennial census in the distribution of federal funds. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
[25] Stehr-Green, P., Bettles, J., & Robertson, L. (2002). Effect of racial/ethnic misclassification of American Indians and Alaskan Natives on Washington State death certificates, 1989-1997. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 443-444. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.3.443
[26] Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2009). Results from the 2008 national survey on drug use and health: National findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-36, HHS Publication No. SMA 09-4434). Rockville, MD.
[27] Sue, D. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
[28] Tafoya, S. (2004). Shades of belonging. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
[29] Urban League of Portland (2009). The state of Black Oregon. Portland, OR: Urban League of Portland.
[30] United Way of the Columbia-Willamette (2007). Community needs assessment 2007. Portland, OR: United Way of the Columbia-Wil- lamette.
[31] US Census Bureau (2004a). Accuracy and coverage evaluation of Census 2000: Design and methodology. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
[32] US Census Bureau (2004b). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs: Implementing the American Community Survey. Suitland, MD: US Department of Commerce.
[33] US Department of Education (2007). Final guidance on maintaining, collecting and reporting racial and ethnic data to the US Department of Education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
[34] Wilson, E. (2005). Reinventing liberatory practice: How do we work with groups of which we are not a part? International Conference on Engaging Communities—Conference Papers, Queensland, Australia.
[35] Wilson, G. (2001). Conceptual frameworks and emancipator research in social gerontology. Ageing and Society, 21, 471-487. doi:10.1017/S0144686X01008315
[36] Young, I. (2000). Structure, difference and Hispanic/Latino claims of justice. In J. Gracia, & P. Greiff (Eds.) Hispanics/Latinos in the United States: Ethnicity, race and rights (pp. 147-165). New York: Routledge.
[37] Young, I., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[38] Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E., (Eds.) (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.