Share This Article:

Reconsideration of So-Called “Invasive” Meningioma

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1037KB) PP. 118-123
DOI: 10.4236/ojmn.2015.54020    2,738 Downloads   3,116 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

For the purpose of histopathological diagnosis, so-called “invasive meningioma” is defined as a meningioma that has infiltrated the cerebral parenchyma, and such cortical infiltration raises the risk of recurrence. However, as the definition of “invasive” remains far from clear, we have attempted to redefine it. Tumors that were completely removed from 32 patients between April 2005 and September 2015 and that had been diagnosed as so-called “invasive meningioma” were classified by World Health Organization grade (Group I–III), and then further classified as: true invasion, involving invasion of the brain with breakdown of the pia mater; and pseudo-invasion, involving encroachment into the brain with the pia mater still intact. We then investigated recurrence rates in the brain or dura mater for each group. Rate of recurrence in the brain or dura mater was significantly higher for Group I meningioma classified as true invasion compared to that of the same group classified as pseudo-invasion. We redefined so-called “invasive meningioma” as Group I meningioma exhibiting true invasion, and considered that, when possible, wide resection of the areas of adhesion to the dura mater in addition to tumor extirpation along with the cerebral parenchyma increased the success rate for curative treatment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Okada, T. , Fujitsu, K. , Ichikawa, T. , Miyahara, K. , Tanino, S. , Yasuhiro, U. , Tanaka, Y. , Tsuchiya, Y. , Noda, N. , Niino, H. and Yagishita, S. (2015) Reconsideration of So-Called “Invasive” Meningioma. Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery, 5, 118-123. doi: 10.4236/ojmn.2015.54020.

References

[1] Gay, E., Lages, E., Ramus, C., Guttin, A., El Atifi, M., Dupré, I., Bouamrani, A., Salon, C., Ratel, D., Wion, D., Berger, F. and Issartel, J.P. (2011) The Heterogeneity of Meningioma Revealed by Multiparameter Analysis: Infiltrative and Non-Infiltrative Clinical Phenotypes. International Journal of Oncology, 38, 1287-1297.
[2] Perry, A., Louis, D.N., Scheithauer, B.W., Budka, H., von Diemling, A., Meningiomas Louis, D.N., Ohgaki, H. and Wiestler, O.D. (2007) World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4th Edition, IARC Press, Lyon, 164-172.
[3] Perry, A., Stafford, S.L., Scheithauer, B.W., Suman, V.J. and Lohse, C.M. (1997) Meningioma Grading: An Analysis of histologic Parameters. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 21, 1455-1465.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199712000-00008
[4] Wippold, F.J., Perry, A. and Lennerz, J. (2006) Neuropathology for the Neuroradiologist: Rosenthal Fibers. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 27, 958-961.
[5] Lah, T.T., Nanni, I., Trinkaus, M., Metellus, P., Dussert, C., De Ridder, L., Rajcevic, U., Blejec, A. and Martin, P.M. (2010) Toward Understanding Recurrent Meningioma: The Potential Role of Lysosomal Cysteine Proteases and Their Inhibitors. Journal of Neurosurgery, 112, 940-950.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2009.7.JNS081729
[6] Wibom, C., Morén, L., Aarhus, M., Knappskog, P.M., Lund-Johansen, M., Antti, H. and Bergenheim, A.T. (2009) Proteomic Profiles Differ between Bone Invasive and Noninvasive Benign Meningiomas of Fibrous and Meningothelial Subtype. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 94, 321-331.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9865-9
[7] Bollag, R.J., Vender, J.R. and Sharma, S. (2010) Anaplastic Meningioma: Progression from Atypical and Chordoid Morphotype with Morphologic Spectral Variation at Recurrence. Neuropathology, 30, 279-287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2009.01060.x
[8] Lohmann, C.M. and Brat, D.J. (2000) A Conceptual Shift in the Grading of Meningiomas. Advances in Anatomic Pathology, 7, 153-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125480-200007030-00004
[9] Ildan, F., Tuna, M., Gocer, A.P., Boyar, B., Bagdatoglu, H., Sen, O., Haciyakupoglu, S. and Burgut, H.R. (1999) Correlation of the Relationships of Brain-Tumor Interfaces, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Angiographic Findings to Predict Cleavage of Meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery, 91, 384-390.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0384
[10] Qi, S.T., Liu, Y., Pan, J., Chotai, S. and Fang, L.X. (2012) A Radiopathological Classification of Dural Tail Sign of Meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery, 117, 645-653.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.JNS111987

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.