Characterization of a Collection of Brassica carinata Genotypes for in vitro Culture Response and Mode of Shoot Regeneration
Javier Gil-Humanes, Antonio Martín, Francisco Barro
.
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2011.21003   PDF    HTML     7,203 Downloads   13,141 Views   Citations

Abstract

Brassica carinata, a natural alloploid formed between B. oleracea and B. nigra, is a potential oil crop for the Mediterranean area in which genetic transformation could help to breeding. In vitro culture and shoot regeneration are key factors in developing an efficient transformation method in the genus Brassica. However, the studies for in vitro culture and shoot regeneration in B. carinata are limited to only a few genotypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro culture response and shoot regeneration in a collection of B. carinata accessions to identify promising genotypes with high shoot regeneration for genetic transformation experiments. Cotyledonary explants from 51 genotypes were cultured in vitro and callus formation and swelling as well as the mode of shoot regeneration evaluated. A highly positive response to in vitro culture, i.e. callus formation or swelling, was observed in all the genotypes tested. Tissue blackening occurred only in eleven genotypes. Parameters like callus formation and swelling, and number of shoots per explant were highly variable among genotypes. Fourteen genotypes regenerated only via callus formation, whereas only one regenerated only via swelling. Most genotypes showed a higher percentage of callus formation than swelling. The average number of shoots regenerating per explant among genotypes was the most variable factor measured. Six genotypes regenerated more than 6 shoots per explant via callus phase. These genotypes have been identified as having a high regeneration potential and can be used in genetic transformation via Agrobacterium.

Share and Cite:

J. Gil-Humanes, A. Martín and F. Barro, "Characterization of a Collection of Brassica carinata Genotypes for in vitro Culture Response and Mode of Shoot Regeneration," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2011, pp. 27-34. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2011.21003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] W. Friedt and W. Luhs, “Recent Developments and Perspectives of Industrial Rapeseed Breeding,” Fett-Lipid, Vol. 100, No. 6, June 1998, pp. 219-226. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199806)100:6<219::AID-LIPI219>3.0.CO;2-Y
[2] R. K. Katiyar, G. Saran and G. Giri, “Evaluation of Brassica carinata as a New Oilseed Crop in India,” Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 22, No. 1, January 1986, pp. 67-70. doi:10.1017/S0014479700014058
[3] A. Getinet, G. Rakow and R. K. Downey, “Agronomic Performance and Seed Quality of Ethiopian Mustard in Saskatchewan,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, Vol. 76, No. 3, July 1996, pp. 387-392.
[4] R. S. Malik, “Prospects for Brassica carinata as an Oilseed Crop in India,” Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 26, No. 1, January 1990, pp. 125-129. doi:10.1017/S0014479700015465
[5] M. M. Moloney, J. M. Walker and K. K. Sharma, “High Efficiency Transformation of Brassica napus Using Agrobacterium Vectors,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 8, No. 4, July 1989, pp. 238-242. doi:10.1007/BF00778542
[6] M. Deblock, D. Debrouwer and P. Tenning, “Transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the Expression of the bar and neo Genes in the Transgenic Plants,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 91, No. 2, October 1989, pp. 694-701. doi:10.1104/pp.91.2.694
[7] D. G. Barfield and E. C. Pua, “Gene Transfer in Plants of Brassica juncea Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens Mediated Transformation,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 10, No. 6-7, September 1991, pp. 308-314. doi:10.1007/BF00193148
[8] S. E. Radke, J. C. Turner and D. Facciotti, “Transformation and Regeneration of Brassica rapa Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 11, No. 10, September 1992, pp. 499-505. doi:10.1007/BF00236265
[9] V. Gupta, G. L. Sita, M. S. Shaila and V. Jagannathan, “Genetic Transformation of Brassica nigra by Agrobacterium Based Vector and Direct Plasmid Uptake,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 12, No. 7-8, May 1993, pp. 418-421.
[10] V. Babic, R. S. Datla, G. J. Scoles and W. A. Keller, “Development of an Efficient Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation System for Brassica carinata,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 17, January 1998, pp. 183-188. doi:10.1007/s002990050375
[11] J. W. Liu, S. DeMichele, M. Bergana, E. Bobik, C. Hastilow, L. T. Chuang, P. Mukerji and Y. S. Huang, “Characterization of Oil Exhibiting High Gamma-Linolenic Acid from a Genetically Transformed Canola Strain,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Vol. 78, No. 5, May 2001, pp. 489-493. doi:10.1007/s11746-001-0291-2
[12] R. E. Blackshaw, D. Kanashiro, M. M. Moloney and W. L. Crosby, “Growth, Yield and Quality of Canola Expressing Resistance to Acetolactate Synthase Inhibiting Herbicides,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, Vol. 74, No. 4, October 1994, pp. 745-751.
[13] R. Z. Zhong, F. Zhu, Y. L. Liu, S. G. Li, L. Y. Kang and P. Luo, “Oilseed Rape Transformation and the Establish- ment of a Bromoxynil-Resistant Transgenic Oilseed Rape,” Acta Botanica Sinica, Vol. 39, September 1997, pp. 22-27.
[14] A. Jadhav, V. Katavic, E. F. Marillia, E. M. Giblin, D. L. Barton, A. Kumar, C. Sonntag, V. Babic, W. A. Keller and D. C. Taylor, “Increased Levels of Erucic Acid in Brassica carinata by Co-suppression and Antisense Repression of the Endogenous FAD2 Gene,” Metabolic Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3, May 2005, pp. 215-220. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2005.02.003
[15] Y. Ono, Y. Takahata and N. Kaizuma, “Effect of Genotype on Shoot Regeneration from Cotyledonary Explants of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.),” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1, November 1994, pp. 13-17. doi:10.1007/BF00233290
[16] S. K. Phogat, P. K. Burma and D. Pental, “High Frequency Regeneration of Brassica napus Varieties and Genetic Transformation of Stocks Containing Fertility Restorer Genes for Two Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Systems,” Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 9, No. 2, July 2000, pp. 73-79.
[17] D. Pental, A. K. Pradhan, Y. S. Sodhi and A. Mukhopadhyay, “Variation amongst Brassica juncea Cultivars for Regeneration from Hypocotyl Explants and Optimization of Conditions for Agrobacterium Mediated Genetic Transformation,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 12, No. 7-8, May 1993, pp. 462-467. doi:10.1007/BF00234713
[18] F. L. Zhang, Y. Takahata and J. B. Xu, “Medium and Genotype Factors Influencing Shoot Regeneration from Cotyledonary Explants of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. pekinensis),” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 17, No. 10, July 1998, pp. 780-786. doi:10.1007/s002990050482
[19] P. A. C. Sparrow, T. M. Townsend, C. L. Morgan, P. J. Dale, A. E. Arthur and J. A. Irwin, “Genetic Analysis of in vitro Shoot Regeneration from Cotyledonary Petioles of Brassica oleracea,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 108, No. 7, May 2004, pp. 1249-1255. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1539-y
[20] M. F. Dietert, S. A. Barron and O. C. Yoder, “Effects of Genotype on in vitro Culture in the Genus Brassica,” Plant Science Letters, Vol. 26, No. 2-3, August 1982, pp. 233-240. doi:10.1016/0304-4211(82)90096-7
[21] F. Barro and A. Martín, “Response of Different Genotypes of Brassica carinata to Microspore Culture,” Plant Breeding, Vol. 118, No. 1, March 1999, pp. 79-81. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.1999.118001079.x
[22] P. A. C. Sparrow, P. J. Dale and J. A. Irwin, “The Use of Phenotypic Markers to Identify Brassica oleracea Genotypes for Routine High-Throughput Agrobacterium-me- diated Transformation,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 23, No. 1-2, August 2004, pp. 64-70. doi:10.1007/s00299-004-0818-7
[23] T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures,” Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 15, No. 3, July 1962, pp. 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
[24] P. A. C. Sparrow, J. W. Snape, P. J. Dale and J. A. Irwin, “The Rapid Identification of B. napus Genotypes, for High-Throughput Transformation, Using Phenotypic Tissue Culture Markers,” Acta Horticulture, Vol. 706, April 2006, pp. 239-247.
[25] O. Toldi, G. Gyulai, J. Kiss, I. A. Tamas and E. Balazs, “Antiauxin Enhanced Microshoot Initiation and Plant Regeneration from Epicotyl-Originated Thin-Layer Explants of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.),” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 15, No. 11, August 1996, pp. 851-854. doi:10.1007/BF00233155
[26] C. Detrez, R. S. Sangwan and B. S. Sangwannorreel, “Phenotypic and Karyotypic Status of Beta vulgaris Plants Regenerated from Direct Organogenesis in Petiole Culture,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 77, No. 4, April 1989, pp. 462-468. doi:10.1007/BF00274264
[27] A. Mukhopadhyay, N. Arumugam, P. B. A. Nandakumar, A. K. Pradhan, V. Gupta and D. Pental, “Agrobacterium Mediated Genetic Transformation of Oilseed Brassica campestris Transformation Frequency is Strongly Influenced by the Mode of Shoot Regeneration,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 11, No. 10, September 1992, pp. 506-513. doi:10.1007/BF00236266
[28] P. A. C. Sparrow, T. M. Townsend, A. E. Arthur, P. J. Dale and J. A. Irwin, “Genetic Analysis of Agrobacterium Tumefaciens Susceptibility in Brassica oleracea,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 108, No. 4, February 2004, pp. 644-650. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1473-z
[29] S. B. Narasimhulu and V. L. Chopra, “Plant Regeneration from Callus Cultures of Brassica carinata A. Br. and Its Implications to Improvement of Oil Seed Brassicas,” Plant Breeding, Vol. 99, No. 1, September 1987, pp. 49-55. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1987.tb01149.x
[30] S. B. Narasimhulu and V. L. Chopra, “Species Specific Shoot Regeneration Response of Cotyledonary Explants of Brassicas,” Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 7, No. 2, March 1988, pp. 104-106. doi:10.1007/BF00270115
[31] M. Z. Yang, S. R. Jia and E. C. Pua, “High Frequency of Plant Regeneration from Hypocotyl Explants of Brassica carinata A. Br.,” Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 24, No. 2, February 1991, pp. 79-82. doi:10.1007/BF00039734

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.