Share This Article:

Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Soccer Offensive Game Performance Ability

PP. 119-125
DOI: 10.4236/ape.2012.23021    3,170 Downloads   5,602 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to design and validate the Soccer Offensive Game Performance Instrument (SOGPI) that assessed pre-service teachers’ offensive game abilities in soccer. One investigator videotaped two 10-minute 3 vs. 3 soccer games played by twelve pre-service teachers at the end of a soccer unit. Two investigators independently coded 480 offensive game behaviors with the SOGPI. The results of t-tests indicated that the SOGPI was a valid instrument to differentiate the players’ overall game performance and individual game components between the novice and the experience groups. The results of the inter-rater reliability indicated that the SOGPI was a reliable instrument to assess pre-service teachers’ offensive game abilities in soccer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Chen, W. & Hendricks, K. (2012). Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Soccer Offensive Game Performance Ability. Advances in Physical Education, 2, 119-125. doi: 10.4236/ape.2012.23021.

References

[1] Alexander, K., & Penney, D. (2005). Teaching under the influence: Feeding games for understanding into the sport education development-refinement cycle. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10, 287-301. doi:10.1080/17408980500340901
[2] Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1991). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
[3] Gardner, H. (1992). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. R. Gifford, & M. C. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessment: Alternative view of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 77-119). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
[4] Gréhaigne, J., & Godbout P. (1998). Formative assessment in team sports in a tactical approach context. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 69, 46-51.
[5] Gréhaigne, J. F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier D. (1997). Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 500-516.
[6] Gréhaigne, J. F., Walllian, N., & Godbout, P. (2005). Tactical-decision learning model and students’ practices. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10, 255-269.
[7] Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[8] Hastie, P. A. (1996). Student role involvement during a unit of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 88-103.
[9] Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177-192.
[10] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815355
[11] Launder, A. G. (2001). Play practice: The games approach to teaching and coaching sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[12] Lund, J. L., & Kirk, M. F. (2002). Performance-based assessment for middle and high school physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[13] McCullick, B. A. (2001). Practitioners’ perspectives on values, knowledge, and skills needed by PETE participants. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 35-56.
[14] Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 220-240.
[15] Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1999). An investigation of tactical transfer in net games. European Journal of Physical Education, 4, 162-172. doi:10.1080/1740898990040205
[16] Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2006). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[17] Nadeau, L., Richard, J. F., Godbout, P. (2007). The validity and reliability of a performance assessment procedure in ice hockey. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 65-83. doi:10.1080/17408980701444718
[18] National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) (2009). National standards & guidelines for physical education teacher education (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[19] Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 231-243.
[20] Richard, J. F., Gobout, P., & Gréhaigne, J. F. (2000). Students’ precision and reliability of performance assessment in team sports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 85-91.
[21] Rovegno, I. (2006). Situated perspectives on learning. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 262-264). London, UK: Sage Publications.
[22] Siedentop, D. (2002). Content knowledge for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 368-377.
[23] Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[24] Van der Mars, H. (1989). Observer reliability: Issues and procedures. In P. Darst, D. Zakrajsek, & V. Mancini (Eds.), Analyzing physical education and sport instruction (2nd ed., pp. 53-80). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.