Radical Stabilization in Dissolved Humates

Barbora Bakajová, Ray von Wandruszka

.

DOI: 10.4236/ojpc.2011.13008                

Abstract

Quinoid entities, in which quinone and hydroquinone groups equilibrate via a semiquinone radical intermediate, are a common structural feature in humic materials. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals of these radicals are significantly enhanced in the presence of diamagnetic divalent metal ions such as Mg²⁺, while monovalent ions do not show the effect. The addition of trivalent ions leads to rapid precipitation, leaving little room for observation. It was noted that the metal ions producing EPR signal enhancement were also underwent effective bridging interactions with humic subunits, forming pseudomicellar structures. Particle growth determined through dynamic light scattering measurements coincided with the onset of EPR signal enhancement, and surface tension measurements further corroborated the coincidence of aggregation. The addition of a chaotrope (urea), which broke up the humic structures, eliminated the EPR signal increases. These observations strongly suggested that bridging interactions by divalent metal ions, and the intramo- lecular aggregation that accompanied it, led to significant stabilization of semiquinone radicals within the humic structure.

Keywords

Humic Acid, Semiquinone, EPR Enhancement, Bridging Interactions, Aggregation, Radical Stabilization

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	F. J. Stevenson, “Humus Chemistry. Genesis, Compo- sition and Reactions,” 2nd Edition, Willey and Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 195-220.
[2]	N. Senesi and E. Loffredo, “The Chemistry of Soil Organic Matter, Soil Physical Chemistry,” In: D. L. Sparks, Ed., Soil Physical Chemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999, pp. 239-370.
[3]	M. Jerzykiewicz, A. Jiezierski, F. Czechowski and J. Drozd, “Influence of Metal Ions Binding on Free Radical Concentration in Humic Acids. A Quantitative Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Study,” Organic Geochemistry, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2002, pp. 265-268. doi:10.1016/S0146-6380(01)00158-9
[4]	M. Jerzykiewicz, J. Drozd and A. Jezierski, “Organic Radicals and Paramagnetic Metal Complexes in Muni- cipal Solid Waste Composts. An EPR Study and Che- mical Study,” Chemosphere, Vol. 39, No. 2, 1999, pp. 253-268. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00107-1
[5]	A. Jezierski, M. Czechovski, M. Jerzykiewicz and J. Drozd, “EPR Investigations of Humic Acids Structure from Compost, Soil, Peat and Soft Brown Coal upon Oxidation and Metal Uptake,” Applied Magnetic Reso- nance, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000, pp. 127-136. doi:10.1007/BF03162104
[6]	A. Jezierski, M. Czechovski, M. Jerzykiewicz, I. Golonka, J. Drozd, E. Bylinska, Y. Chen and M. Seaward, “Quan- titative EPR Study on Free Radicals in the Natural Polyphenols Interacting with Metal Ions and Other Environmental Pollutants,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A, Vol. 58, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1293-1300. doi:10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00718-1
[7]	N. Palmer and R. von Wandruszka, “Dynamic Light Scattering Measurements of Particle Size Development in Aqueous Humic Material,” Fresenius Journal of Ana- lytical Chemistry, Vol. 371, No. 7, 2001, pp. 951-954. doi:10.1007/s002160101037
[8]	L. M. Yates and R. von Wandruszka, “Effects of pH and Metals on the Surface Tension of Aqueous Humic Ma- terials,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 63, No. 6, 1999, pp.1645-1649. doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.6361645x
[9]	R. R. Engebretson and R. von Wandruszka, “The Effect of Molecular Size on Humic Acid Association,” Organic Geochemistry, Vol. 26, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 759-767. doi:10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00057-0
[10]	R. von Wandruszka, C. Ragle and R. Engebretson, “The Role of Selected Cations in the Formation of Pseu- domicelles in Aqueous Humic Acid,” Talanta, Vol. 44, No. 5, 1997, pp. 805-809. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(96)02116-9
[11]	I. Golonka, F. Czechowski and A. Jezierski, “EPR Characteristic of Heat treartedTreated Complexes of Metals with Demineralised Humic Brown Coal in Air and Ammonia Atmospheres,” Geoderma, Vol. 127, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 237-252. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.005
[12]	J. Riggle and R. von Wandruszka, “Conductometric Characterization of Dissolved Humic Materials,” Talanta, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2002, pp. 519-526. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00052-8
[13]	S. Arai and K. Kumada, “An Interpretation of the Con- ductometric Titration Curve of Humic Acid,” Geoderma, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1977, pp. 21-35. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(77)90011-8
[14]	S. Arai and K. Kumada, “Fractional Determination of Functional Groups of Humic Acids by Conductometric Titration,” Geoderma, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1977, pp. 307-317. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(77)90072-6
[15]	N. Senesi and M. Schnitzer, “Effect of pH, Reaction Time, Chemical Reduction and Irradiation on ESR Spectra of Fulvic Acid,” Soil Science, Vol. 123, 1977, pp. 224-234. doi:10.1097/00010694-197704000-00003
[16]	H. Uedaira and H. Uedaira, “Role of Hydration of Poly- hydroxy Compound in Biological Systems,” Cell Mole- cular Biology, Vol. 7, 2001, pp. 823-829.
[17]	R. R. Engebretson, T. Amos and R. von Wandruszka, “Quantitative Approach to Humic Acid Associations,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1996, pp. 990-997. doi:10.1021/es950478g
[18]	J. Kislinger, F. Novak and J. Kucerik, “Role of Aromaticity Degree in the Stability of Humic Substances,” In: I. V. Perminova and N. A. Kulikova, Eds., Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of the International Humic Substances So- ciety, Humus Sapiens, Moscow, Vol. 1, 2008, pp. 253- 256.