Share This Article:

Advances InInterdisciplinary Researches to Construct a Theory of Consciousness

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:173KB) PP. 242-261
DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2011.14031    5,217 Downloads   10,495 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The interdisciplinary researches for a scientific explanation of consciousness constitute one of the most exciting challenges of contemporary science. However, although considerable progress has been made in the neurophysiology of states of consciousness such as sleep/waking cycles, investigation of subjective and objective nature of consciousness contents raises still serious difficulties. Based on a wide range of analysis and experimental studies, approaches to modeling consciousness actually focus on both philosophical, non-neural and neural approaches. Philosophical and non-neural approaches include the naturalistic dualism model of Chalmers, the multiple draft cognitive model of Dennett, the phenomenological theory of Varela and Maturana, and the physics-based hypothesis of Hameroff and Penrose. The neurobiological approaches include the neurodynamical model of Freeman, the visual system-based theories of Lamme, Zeki, Milner and Goodale, the phenomenal/access hypothesis of Block, the emotive somatosensory theory of Damasio, the synchronized cortical model of Llinas and of Crick and Koch, and the global neurophysiological brain model of Changeux and Edelman. There have been also many efforts in recent years to study the artificial intelligence systems such as neurorobots and some supercomputer programs, based on laws of computational machines and on laws of processing capabilities of biological systems. This approach has proven to be a fertile physical enterprise to check some hypothesis about the functioning of brain architecture. Until now, however, no machine has been capable of reproducing an artificial consciousness.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

P. Blanquet, "Advances InInterdisciplinary Researches to Construct a Theory of Consciousness," Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, Vol. 1 No. 4, 2011, pp. 242-261. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2011.14031.

References

[1] R. Descartes, “The Philosophical Works of Descartes,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975.
[2] P. H. Nidditch, “Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding,” 3rd Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.
[3] J.-N. Missa, “Que Peut-On Espérer d’Une Théorie Neuroscientifique de la Conscience? Plaidoyer Pour une Approche Evolutionniste,” In: P. Poirier and L. Faucher, Eds., Des neurosciences à la philosophie. Neurophilosophie et philosophie des neurosciences, Syllepse, Paris, 2008, pp. 356-357.
[4] S. Nicolas, “Psychologie de W. Wundt,” L’Harmattan, Paris, 2003.
[5] R. Rudio, “William James, Philosophie, Psychologie Religion,” L’Harmattan, Paris, 2008.
[6] G. Schiemann, “Hermann von Helmholtz’s Mechanism: The Loss of Certainty. A Study on the Transition from Classical to Modern Philosophy of Nature,” Springer, Dordrecht, 2009.
[7] E. Husserl, “Idées Directrices Pour une Phénoménologie,” Gallimard, Paris, 1950.
[8] J. Watson, “Behaviorism,” W. W. Norton, New York, 1924.
[9] B. F. Skinner, “Science and Human Behaviour,” Mac Millan, New York, 1953.
[10] U. Neisser, “Cognitive Psychology,” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1965.
[11] H. Gardner, “Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences,” Basic Books, New York, 1983.
[12] M. Heidelberger, “Archived Draft of the Mind-Body Problem in the Origin of Logical Empirism: Herbert Feigle and Psychophysical Parallelism,” Pittsburg University Press, Pittsburg, 2003.
[13] D. Robinson, “Epiphenomenalism, Laws and Properties,” Philosophical Studies, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1982, pp. 1-34. doi:10.1007/BF00989622
[14] P. S. Churchland, “Que Peut Nous Enseigner la Neurobiologie au Sujet de la Conscience?” Poirier Faucher, 2008, pp. 329-354.
[15] J. M. Roy, “Naturalism Emergentist and Causal Explanation,” Intellectica, Vol. 39, 2004, pp. 199-227.
[16] D. J. Chalmers, “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 200-219.
[17] D. J. Chalmers, “The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
[18] C. Mc Ginn, “Consciousness and Its Objects,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
[19] T. Nagel, “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review, Vol. 83, No. 4, 1974, pp. 435-450. doi:10.2307/2183914
[20] D.C. Dennett, “Quining Qualia,” In: A. Marcel and E. Bisiach, Eds., Consciousness in Contemporary Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988, pp 42-77.
[21] D. C. Dennett and M. Kinsbourne, “Time and the Observer: The Where and When of Consciousness in the Brain,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1992, pp. 183-247. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00068229
[22] J. R. Searle, “Le Mystère de la Conscience,” Odile Jacob, Paris, 1999.
[23] D. C. Dennett, “Freedom Evolves,” Viking Press, New York, 2003.
[24] D. C. Dennett, “Darwin’ s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life,” Simon & Schuster, New York, 1996.
[25] R. Dawkin, “The Selfish Gene,” 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.
[26] G. M. Edelman, “Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of Mind,” The Penguin Press, London, 1992.
[27] D. J. Chalmers, “The Cognitive Neurosciences III,” MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[28] C. I. Lewis, “Mind and the World Order,” Charles Scribners Sons, New York, 1929.
[29] B. Keeley, “The Early History of the Quale and Its Relation to the Senses,” In: J. Symons and P. Calvo, Eds., Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Psychology, Routledge Press, New York, 2009.
[30] J. Levine, “Qualia: Intrinsic, Relational or What?” In: T. Metzinger, Ed., Conscious Experience, Sch?ningh, Paderborn, 1995, pp. 277-292.
[31] A. N. Whitehead, “Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology,” Macmillan, New York, 1929.
[32] J. Haugeland, “Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea,” The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1985.
[33] C. Koch,“The Quest forConsciousness:Neurobiological Approach,” Roberts, Englewood, 2004.
[34] T. Horgan and J. Tienson, “The Intentionality of Phenomenology and Phenomenology of Intentionality,” In: D. Chalmers, Ed., Philosophy Ofmind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 520-533.
[35] J. Delacour, “Conscience and Brain. The New Border of the Neurosciences,” DeBoeck University, Brussels, 2001.
[36] J. Delacour, “Biology of the Conscience,” Philosophical Review of France and Abroad, Vol. 129, 2004, pp. 315-332.
[37] J. Hohwy, “The Neural Correlates of Consciousness: New Experimental Approaches Needed?” Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2009, pp. 428-438. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.006
[38] J. Delacour, “Neurobiology of Consciousness: An Overview,” Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 85, No. 2, 1997, pp. 127-141. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(96)00161-1
[39] T. J. Balkin, A. L. Braun, N. J. Wesensten, K. Jeffries, M. Varga, P. Baldwin, G. Belenky and P. Herscovitch, “The Process of Awakening: A PET Study of Regional Brain Activity Patterns Mediating the Re-Establishment of Alertness and Consciousness,” Brain, Vol. 125, No.10, 2002, pp. 2308-2319. doi:10.1093/brain/awf228
[40] D. J. Chalmers, “What Is a Neural Correlate of consciousness?” In: T. Metzinger, Ed., Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
[41] G. M. Edelman, “Naturalizing Consciousness: A Theoretical Framework,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 100, No. 9, 2003, pp. 5520-5524. doi:10.1073/pnas.0931349100
[42] G. Tononi and C. Koch, “The Neural Correlates Ofconsciousness: An Update,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1124, No. 1, 2008, pp. 261-298. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.004
[43] C.-Y. Kim and R. Blake, “Psychophysical Magic: Rendering the Visible ‘Invisible’,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2004, 381-388. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.012
[44] D. G. Edelman and A. K. Seth, “Animal Consciousness: A Synthetic Approach,” Trends in Neurosciences, Vol. 32, No. 9, 2009, pp. 476-484. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.008
[45] J. A. Mather, “Cephalopod Consciousness: Behavioural Evidence,” Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2008, pp. 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.006
[46] B. Lechevalier, F. Eustace and F. Viader, “Conscience and Its Disorders,” De Boeck University, Brussels, 1998, pp. 151-166.
[47] G. Buttazzo, “Can a Machine Ever Become Self-Aware? Artificial Humans,” Goethe Institute, Los Angeles, 2000, pp. 45-49.
[48] G. G. Towell and J. W. Shavlik, “Knowledge-Base Artificial Neural Networks,” Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 70, No. 1-2, 1994, pp. 119-165. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)90105-8
[49] R. Andrews, J. Diederich and A. B. Tickle, “Survey an Critique of Techniques for Extracting Rules from Trained Artificial Neural Networks,” Knowledge-Based System, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1995, pp. 373-389. doi:10.1016/0950-7051(96)81920-4
[50] P. Stern and J. Travis, “Of Bytes and Brains,” Science, Vol. 314, No. 5796, 2006, pp. 75-77. doi:10.1126/science.314.5796.75
[51] D. E. Goldberg, “Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1989.
[52] Z. Michalewicz, “Genetic Algorithm, Data Structures, Evolution Programs,” 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.
[53] A. E. Eiben and M. Schoenauer, “Evolutionary Computing,” Information Processing Letters, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00204-1
[54] E. Bonabeau, “Agent-Based Modeling: Methods and Techniques for Simulating Human Systems,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 99, No. 3, 2002, pp. 7280-7287. doi:10.1073/pnas.082080899
[55] A. Cardon, “A Multi-Agent Model for Co-Operative Communications in Crisis Management Systems: The Act of Communication,” Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 66-82.
[56] A. Cardon, T. Galinho and J.-P. Vacher, “Genetic Algorithm Using Multi-Objective in a Multi-Agent System,” Robotic and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 33, 2000, pp. 179-190.
[57] A. Cardon, “Design and Behaviour of a Massive Organization of Agents,” Design of Intelligent Multi-Agent Systems, Human-Centredness, Architectures, Learning and Adaptation, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Vol. 162, 2004, pp. 133-190.
[58] A. Cardon, “Artificial Consciousness, Artificial Emotions, and Autonomous Robots,” Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006.
[59] R. Sanz, I. Lopez and J. Bermejo-Alonso, “A Rational and Vision for Machine Consciousness in Complex Controllers” Artificial Consciousness, Imprint Academic, Exeter, 2007.
[60] Y. Shoham and K. Leyton-Brown, “Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
[61] J. L. Krichmar and G.M. Edelman,“Machine Psychology: Autonomous Behavior, Perceptual Categorization, and Conditioning in a Brain-Based Device” Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2002, pp. 818-830. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.8.818
[62] O. Holland, R. Knight and R. Newcombe, “The Role of the Self Process in Embodied Machine Consciousness,” Artificial Consciousness, Imprint Academic, Exeter, 2007.
[63] H. Markram, “The Blue Brain Project,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 7, 2006, pp. 153-160. doi:10.1038/nrn1848
[64] D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett, “Sights of the Spirit,” InterEditions, Paris, 1987.
[65] G. Hesslow and D. A. Jirenhed, “Must Machines Be Zombie? Internal Simulation as a Mechanism for Machine Consciousness,” AAA Symposium, Washington DC, 8-11 November 2007, pp. 1-6.
[66] H. Maturana and F. Varela, “Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living,” D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1980. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
[67] F. J. Varela, “Neurophenomenology: A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 3, 1996, pp. 330-349.
[68] F. J. Varela, “The Naturalization of Phenomenology as the Transcendence of Nature: Searching for Mutual Generative Constraints,” Alter: Revue de Phénoménologie, Vol. 5, 1997, pp. 355-385.
[69] F. J. Varela, “A Science of Consciousness as If Experience Mattered,” In: S. Hameroff, A. W. Kaszniak and A. C. Scott, Eds., Towards a Science of Consciousness II; The Second Tucson Discussions and Debates, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.
[70] D. Rudrauf, A. Lutz, D. Cosmelli, J.-P. Lachaux and M. LeVan Quyen, “From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela’s Exploration of the Biophysics of Being,” Biological Research, Vol. 36, 2003 pp. 1-28.
[71] M. Merleau-Ponty, “The Structure of Behavior,” Beacon Press, Boston, 1963.
[72] F. J. Varela, “Organism: Ameshworkof Selfless Selves,” Organism and the Origin of Self, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991, pp. 79-107.
[73] F. J. Varela, “Steps to a Science of Interbeing: Unfolding Implicit the Dharma in Modern Cognitive Science,” In: S. Bachelor, G. Claxton and G. Watson, Eds., The Psychology of Awakening: Buddhism, Science and Our Day to Day Lives, Rider/Randol House, New York, 1999, pp. 71-89.
[74] P. L. Luisi, “Autopoiesis: A Review and a Reappraisal,” Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 90, 2003, pp. 49-59.
[75] R. Penrose, “The Emperor’s New Mind,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.
[76] R. Penrose, “Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
[77] S. Hameroff and R. Penrose, “Orchestrated Reduction of Quantum Coherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model for Consciousness,” Neural Network World, Vol. 5, 1995, pp. 793-804.
[78] S. Hameroff and R. Penrose, “Orchestrated Reduction of Quantum Coherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model for Consciousness,” In: S. R. Hameroff and A. C. Scott, Eds., Toward a Science of Consciousness, The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[79] R. Grush and P. Churchland, “Gaps in Penrose’s Toiling,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 10-29.
[80] W. J. Freeman, “Mass Action in the Nervous System,” Elsevier Science & Technology Books, New York, 1975.
[81] W. J. Freeman, “How Brains Make Up to Their Minds,” Weidenfeld, London, 1999.
[82] W. J. Freeman, “Neurodynamics; Exploration of Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics,” Springer-Verlag, London, 2000. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0371-4
[83] W. J. Freeman, “Mass Action in the Nervous System,” 2004. http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/
[84] W. J. Freeman “Origin, Structure and Role of Background EEG Activity, Part 3, Neural Frame Simulation,” Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 116, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1118-1129. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.12.023
[85] J. J. Wright, “Cortical Phase Transitions: Properties Demonstrated in Continuum Simulations at Mesoscopic and Macroscopic Scales,” Journal of New Mathematics and Na tural Computation. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009, pp. 159-193.
[86] V. A. F. Lamme and P. R. Roelfsema, “The Distinct Modes of Vision Offered by feedforward and Recurrent Processing,” Trends in Neurosciences, Vol. 23, No. 11, 2000, pp. 571-579. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-X
[87] V. A. F. Lamme, “Why Visual Attention and Awareness Are Different,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003, pp. 12-18. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00013-X
[88] V. A. F. Lamme, “Towards a True Neural Stance on Consciousness,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 11, 2006, pp. 494-501. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001
[89] S. Zeki, “A Vision of the Brain,” Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1993.
[90] S. Zeki, “Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
[91] A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale, “The Visual Brain in Action,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
[92] M. A. Goodale and A. D. Milner, “Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, p. 135.
[93] N. Block, “How Can We Find the Neural Correlate of Consciousness?” Trends in Neurosciences, Vol. 19, 1996, pp. 456-459.
[94] N. Block, “On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness,” In: N. Block, O. Flanagan and G. Güzeldere, Eds., The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 375-416.
[95] N. Block, “Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh between Psychology and Neuroscience,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 5-6, 2007, pp. 481-548. doi:10.1017/S0140525X07002786
[96] R. Llinas and D. Pare, “Of Dreaming and Wakefulness,” Neuroscience, Vol. 44, No. 3, 1991, pp. 521-535. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90075-Y
[97] R. Llinas, U. Ribary, D. Contreras and C. Pedroarena, “The Neuronal Basis for Consciousness,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 353, No. 1377, 1998, pp. 1841-1849. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0336
[98] R. Llinas and U. Ribary, “Consciousness and the Brain. The Thalamocortical Dialogue in Health and Disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 929, 2001, pp. 166-175.
[99] F. C. Crick and C. Koch, “Towards a Neurobiological Theory of Consciousness,” Seminars in Neuroscience, Vol. 2, 1990, pp. 263 275.
[100] F. C. Crick and C. Koch, “Consciousness and Neuroscience,” Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1998, 97-107. doi:10.1093/cercor/8.2.97
[101] F. C. Crick and C. Koch, “A Framework for Consciousness,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 6, 2003, pp. 119-126.
[102] A. R. Damasio, “The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness,” Harcour Brace & Co, New York, 1999.
[103] A. R. Damasio, “Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain,” Harcourt Inc, Orland, 2003.
[104] A. R. Damasio, “Descartes’s Error,” Avon Books, New York, 1994.
[105] A. Damasio, T. Ji. Grabowsk, A. Bechara, H. Damasio, L. L. B. Ponto, J. Parvizi and R. D. Hichwa, “Subcortical and Cortical Brain Activity during the Feeling of Self-Generated Emotions,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 3, 2000, pp. 1049-1056.
[106] A. Bechara, H. Damasio and A. R. Damasio, “Emotion, Decision Making and the Orbitofrontal Cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2000, pp. 295-307. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.3.295
[107] J. R. Searle, “The Mystery of Consciousness Continues,” The New York Review of Books, 2000, http:/www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jun/09/mystery-consciousness-continues
[108] S. Dehaene, M. Kerszberg and J.-P. Changeux, “A Neuronal Model of a Global Workspace in Effortful Cognitive Tasks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 95, No. 24, 1998, pp. 14529-14534. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529
[109] S. Dehaene, J.-P. Changeux, L. Naccache, J. Sackur and C. Sergeant, “Conscious, Preconscious, and Subliminal Processing: Has Testable Taxonomy,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 10, 2006, pp. 204-211.
[110] B. J. Baars, T. Z. Ramsoy and S. Laureys, “Brain Conscious Experience and the Observing Self,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 12, 2003, pp. 671-675. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2003.09.015
[111] B. J. Baar, “A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
[112] S. Dehaene and J.-P. Changeux, “Reward-Dependent Learning in Neuronal Networks for Planning and Decision Making,” Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 126, 2000, pp. 217-229. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26016-0
[113] S. Dehaene and L. Naccache, “Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness: Basic Evidence and a Workspace Framework,” Cognition, Vol. 79, No. 1-2, 2001, pp. 1-37. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2
[114] S. Dehaene, C. Sergent and J.-P.Changeux, “A Neuronal Network Model Linking Subjective Reports and Objective Physiological Data during Conscious Perception,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 100, No. 14, 2003, pp. 8520-8525. doi:10.1073/pnas.1332574100
[115] J.-P. Changeux and S. Dehaene, “The Workspace Model: Conscious Processing and Learning,” In: R. Menzel, Ed., Learning Theory and Behavior, Vol 1 of Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, Elsevier, Oxford, 2008, pp. 729-758.
[116] J.-P. Changeux, “The Physiology of Truth,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[117] H. Walter, “Neurophilosophy of Free Will. Frontal Cortex and Intelligibility,” The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2002, pp. 565-570.
[118] J.-P. Changeux, “The Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985.
[119] S. Dehaene and J.-P. Changeux, “Neural Mechanisms for Access to Consciousness,” The Cognitive Neurosciences III, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[120] J.-P. Changeux and P. Ricoeur, “What Makes Us Think,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002.
[121] G. Tononi, O. Sporns and G. M. Edelman, “Reentry and The Problem of Integrating Multiple Cortical Areas: Simulation of Dynamic Integration in the Visual System,” Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1992, pp. 310-335. doi:10.1093/cercor/2.4.310
[122] G. M. Edelman and G. Tononi, “A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination,” In: G. M. Edelman and G. Tononi, Eds., Basic Books, New York, 2000.
[123] G. N. Reeke, L. H. Finkel, O. Sporns and G. M. Edelman, “Synthetic Neural Modeling: A Multilevel Approach to the Analysis of Brain Complexity,” Bulletin of the French Company of Philosophy, Conference of February 28, 1990, pp. 607-707.
[124] J. L. Krichmar and G. M. Edelman, “Brain-Based Devices for the Study of Nervous Systems and the Development of Intelligent Machines,” Artificial Life, Vol. 11, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 63-77. doi:10.1162/1064546053278946
[125] G. M. Edelman, “Vaster than the Sky. The Gift of Consciousness,” Yale University Press, New Haven/London, 2004.
[126] G. M. Edelman, “Building a Picture of the Brain,” Daedalus, Vol. 127, 1998, pp. 37-69.
[127] A. Berthoz, “La Direction du Mouvement,” Odile Jacob, Paris, 1997.
[128] J. P. Tassin, “Le Rêve Na?t du Sommeil,” Pour la Science, Vol. 28, 1995, pp. 22-23.
[129] M. Merleau-Ponty,“Phenomenology of Perception,” Humanities Press, New York, 1962.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.