Share This Article:

Diagnostic value of dobutamine stress Doppler tissue imaging in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:729KB) PP. 1-12
DOI: 10.4236/wjcd.2011.11001    4,065 Downloads   8,826 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is often silent in diabetic patients, and it is typically in ad-vanced stages of development by the time it manifests. Various forms of stress testing have been investigated to detect obstructive CAD in diabetes mellitus. Ob-jectives: To assess the diagnostic value of dobutamine stress pulsed-wave Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) compared with standard wall motion analysis in de-tection of myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients with suspected CAD. Methods: The study comprised 46 diabetic patients with suspected CAD underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) with DTI within 4 weeks before coronary angiography(CA). Dobutamine infusion started at 5 µ/kg/min and in-creased up to 40 µ/kg/min with additional atropine during submaximal heart rate responses. In addition to wall-motion score index (WMSI) analysis, pulsed- wave DTI examination of basal and mid segments of posteroseptal, lateral, anterior, inferior and antero- septal walls was performed. Myocardial velocities were measured at rest in the apical 4, 3 and 2-cham- ber views. The measurements were repeated at low dose (10 - 15 µ/kg/min) and at peak stress (40 µ/kg/min). DTI measurements included peak systolic velocity (S), peak early diastolic velocity (E) and peak late diastolic velocity (A) and the results were com-pared to WMSI analysis. Patients were classified into two groups according to CA results; group (I) di-abetics with positive CA (n = 27) and group (II) di-abetics with negative CA (n = 19). Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in duration of diabetes, global WMSI at rest or the ? changes (stress-rest/rest) of WMSI (P > 0.05). Global S and global E were significantly lower in group I compared to group II at peak stress (11.3 ± 3.7 cm/sec vs. 14.5 ± 2.2 cm/sec, p < 0.01) and (11.3 ± 1.6 cm/sec vs. 13.1 ± 2.1 cm/sec, p < 0.01) respectively. The cutoff points for global S and global E to detect obstructive CAD in diabetics were 11.3 cm/s and 11.2 cm/s re-spectively with 75.7%, 73.4% sensitivity and 94.7%, 89.47% specificity respectively. An increment (? changes) less than 0.56 in S or 0.26 in E from rest to peak stress identified CAD with 78.8 %, 89.3% sensi-tivity and 94.7%, 90.7% specificity respectively. The accuracy of DTI parameters during peak stress was higher than WMSI analysis (sensitivity 74.1% vs. 59.3% and specificity 90% vs. 79%, P < 0.01 for each). In multivariate regression analysis, only ?S and ?E were independent predictors of obstructive CAD in diabetics (odd ratio: 36.16, 95% CI, 1.34- 532.01 and 63.77, 95% CI, 3.19-721.47) respectively. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis, using DTI during DSE, adds new dimension in diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. It is more sensitive, specific, accurate and reproducible compared with standard wall motion analysis for recognition of significant CAD in diabetic patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Elnoamany, M. , Badran, H. , Khalil, T. , Kamal, A. , Serag, A. and Yaseen, R. (2011) Diagnostic value of dobutamine stress Doppler tissue imaging in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 1, 1-12. doi: 10.4236/wjcd.2011.11001.

References

[1] Haffner, S.M., Lehto, S., R?nnemaa, T., Py?r?l?, K. and Laakso, M. (1998) Mortality from coronary artery disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 229-234. doi:10.1056/NEJM199807233390404
[2] Herlitz, J., Malmberg, K., Karlsson, B., Ryden, L. and Hjalmarson, A. (1988) Mortality and morbidity during a five year follow up of diabetics with myocardial infarction. Acta Medical Scandinavica, 24, 31-38.
[3] Cosson, E., Paycha, F., Paries, J., Cattan, S., Ramadan, A., Meddah, D., Attali, J.R. and Valensi, P. (2004) Detecting silent coronary stenosis and stratifying cardiac risk in patients with diabetes: ECG stress test or exercise myocardial scintigraphy. Diabet Medicine, 21, 342-348. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01157.x
[4] Nesto, R.W. and Phillips, RT. (1986) Asymptomatic myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients. The American Journal of Medicine, 80, 40-47. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(86)90451-1
[5] Chuah, S., Pellika, P.A. and Roger, V.L. (1998) Role of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting outcome in 860 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circulation, 97, 1474-1480.
[6] Carlos, M.E., Smart, S.C. and Wynsen, J.C. (1997) Do-butamine stress echocardiography for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 95, 1402- 1410.
[7] Rambaldi, R., Poldermans, D., Bax, J., Boersma, E., Elhendy, A., Vletter, W., Roelandt, J. and Valkema, R. (2000) Doppler tissue velocity sampling improves diag-nostic accuracy during dobutamine stress echocardio-graphy for the assessment of viable myocardium in pa-tients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. European Heart Journal, 21, 1091-1098. doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1857
[8] Isaa, K., Munoz del Romeral, L., Lee, E. and Schiller, N.B. (1993) Quantitation of the motion of cardiac base in normal subjects by Doppler echocardiography. Journal of the American Society Echocardiography, 6, 166-176.
[9] Galiuto, L., Ignone, G. and De Maria, A. (1998) Contrac-tion and relaxation velocities of the normal left ventricle using pulsed-wave tissue Doppler echocardiography. The American Journal of Cardiology, 81, 609-614. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00990-9
[10] Sutherland, G.R., Stewart, M.J., Groundstroem, K.W., Moran, C.M., Fleming, A., Guell-Peris, F.J., Riemersma, R.A., Fenn, L.N., Fox, K.A. and McDicken, W.N. (1994) Color Doppler myocardial imaging: A new technique for the assessment of myocardial function. Journal of the American Society Echocardiography, 7, 441-458.
[11] Badran, H.M., Elnoamany, M.F and Seteha, M. (2007) Tissue velocity imaging with dobutamine stress echocar-diography—A quantitative technique for identification of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. Journal of the American Society Echocardiography, 20, 820-831. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2007.01.007
[12] WHO Consultation (1999) Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Report No. 99.2. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[13] MacIndoe, J., Hoffman, R. and Kraus, V. (1997) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 20, 1183-1197.
[14] American Diabetes Association (2005) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 28, S37-S42. doi:10.2337/diacare.28.suppl_1.S37
[15] American Diabetes Association (2003) Physical activi-ty/exercise and diabetes mellitus: position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 26, S73-S77. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.S73
[16] Becher, H., Chambers, J., Fox, K., Jones, R., Leech, G., Masani, N., Monaghan, M., More, R., Nihoyannopoulos, P., Rimington, H., Senior, R. and Warton, G. (2004) Brit-ish Society of Echocardiography Policy Committee. BSE procedure guidelines for the clinical application of stress echocardiography, recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography: A report of the British Society of Echocardiography Policy Committee. Heart, 90, 23-30. doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.047985
[17] Bellotti, P., Fioretti, P., Forster, T., McNeill, A., El Said, M. and Salustri, A. (1993) Reproducibility of the dobu-tamine-atropine echocardiography stress test. Echocar-diography, 10, 93-97. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.1993.tb00017.x
[18] Committee on Physician Training and Education of the American Society of Echocardiography (1998) Recom-mendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Journal of the American Society Echo-cardiography, 11, 97-104. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70132-4
[19] Cain, P., Baglin, T., Case, C., Spicer, D., Short, L. and Marwick, T. (2001) Application of tissue Doppler to in-terpretation of dobutamine echocardiography: Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. The American Journal of Cardiology, 87, 525-531. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01425-9
[20] Pasquet, A., Armstrong, G., Beachler, L., Lauer, M. and Marwick, T. (1999) Use of segmental tissue Doppler ve-locity to quantitate exercise echocardiography. Journal of the American Society Echocardiography, 12, 901-912. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70142-2
[21] Erbel, R., Wallbridge, D.R., Zamorano, J., Drozdz, J. and Nesser, J. (1999) Tissue Doppler echocardiography. Heart, 76, 193-196. doi:10.1136/hrt.76.3.193
[22] Pai, R. and Gill, K. (1998) Amplitudes, durations, and timings of apically directed left ventricular myocardial velocities: Their normal pattern and coupling to ventricular filling and ejection. Journal of the American Society Echo-cardiography, 11, 105-111. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70067-7
[23] Geleijnse, M.L., Fioretti, P.M. and Roelandt, J.R. (1997) Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. Journal of American College Cardiology, 30, 595-606. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00206-4
[24] Reiber, J.H., Serrus, P.W., Kooijman, C.J., Wijns, W., Slager, C.J., Gerbrands, J.J., Schuurbiers, J.C., den Boer, A. and Hugen-Holtz, P.G. (1985) Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cinean-giograms. Circulation, 71, 280-288. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.71.2.280
[25] Saunders, B.D. and Trapp, R.G. (1994) Basic and clinical biostatistics. 2nd Edition, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk.
[26] Pellikka, P. (2005) Stress echocardiography for the diag-nosis of coronary artery disease: Progress towards quan-tification. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 20, 395-398. doi:10.1097/01.hco.0000172705.90640.40
[27] Dhakshinamurthy, V., Eric, L., Avijit, L. and Jeroen, J. (2006) The role of non-invasive imaging in the risk stra-tification of asymptomatic diabetic subjects. European Heart Journal, 27, 905-912
[28] Masoor, K., Robert, M. and Stephen, S. (2002) Prognos-tic value of a negative stress echocardiographic study in diabetic patients. American Heart Journal, 143, 163-168. doi:10.1067/mhj.2002.119377
[29] McDicken, W.N., Sutherland, G.R., Moran, C.M. and Gordon, L.N. (1992) Colour Doppler velocity imaging of the myocardium. Ultrasound in Medicine Biology, 18, 651-654. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(92)90080-T
[30] Marwick, T.H., Case, C., Sawada, S., Vasey, C., Short, L., Lauer, M. (2002) Use of stress echocardiography to pre-dict mortality in patients with diabetes and known or suspected coronary artery disease. Diabetes Care, 25, 1042- 1048. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.6.1042
[31] Sozzi, F.B., Elhendy, A., Roelandt, J.R., Van Domburg, R.T., Schinkel, A.F., Vourvouri, E.C., Bax, J.J., De Sutter, J., Borghetti, A. and Poldermans, D. (2003) Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 26, 1074-1048. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.4.1074
[32] Lauro, C., Riccardo, B., Rosa, S., Patrizia, L., Francesco, B. and Eugenio, P. (2006) Prognostic value of pharma-cological stress echocardiography in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Journal of American College Cardiology, 47, 605-610. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.035
[33] Anne, R., Marc, Z. and Gary, J.B. (2006) Stress testing in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation, 113, 583- 592. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584524
[34] Kamalesh, M., Matorin, R. and Sawada, S. (2002) Prog-nostic value of a negative stress echocardiographic study in diabetic patients. American Heart Journal, 143, 163- 168. doi:10.1067/mhj.2002.119377
[35] Fraser, A.G., M?dler, C.F., Payne, N., Wilkenshoff, U. and Sutherland, G.R. (2003) Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease by quantitative stress echocardi-ography: Optimal diagnostic models using off-line tissue Doppler in the MYDISE study. European Heart Journal, 24, 1584-1594. doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00099-X
[36] Leitman, M., Sidenko, S., Wolf, R., Sucher, E., Rosenblatt, S., Peleg, E., Krakover, R. and Vered, Z. (2003) Improved detection of inferobasal ischemia during dobutamine echocardiography with Doppler tissue imaging. Journal of the American Society Echocardiography, 16, 403-408. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00015-4
[37] Von Bibra, H., Tuchnitz, A., Klein, A., Schneider-Eicke, J., Sch?mig, A. and Schwaiger, M. (2000) Regional diastolic function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping for the detection of left ventricular ischemia during pharmacologic stress testing. Journal of American College Cardiology, 36, 444-452. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00735-X
[38] Yamada, E., Garcia, M., Thomas, J.D. and Marwick, T.H. (1998) Myocardial Doppler velocity imaging—A quan-titative technique for interpretation of dobutamine echo-cardiography. Journal of American College Cardiology, 82, 806-809.
[39] Jelena, C., George, R., Aleksandras, L., Diana, Z., Alfre-das R. and Virginija, G. (2004) Is post-systolic motion the optimal ultrasound parameter to detect induced ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography? European Heart Journal, 25, 932-942. doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.005
[40] Ofelia, N., Peter, C., Colin, C., Sudhir, W. and Thomas, H. (2002) Determinants of tissue Doppler measures of regional diastolic function during dobutamine stress echocardiography. American Heart Journal, 144, 516- 523. doi:10.1067/mhj.2002.123836
[41] Jun, T., Hirono, O., Kubota, I., Okuyama, M., Fukui, A., Yamaki, M. and Tomoike, H. (2000) Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of myocardial viability: Assessment of left ventricular systolic velocities in longitudinal axis by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging. Jap-anese Heart Journal, 41, 435-443. doi:10.1536/jhj.41.435
[42] Kugacka, A., Claeys, M., Rademakers, F. (1998) Diastolic indexes during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients early after myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Society Echocardiography, 11, 26-35. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70117-8

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.