Share This Article:

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:927KB) PP. 233-242
DOI: 10.4236/wjcd.2017.78022    428 Downloads   936 Views  

ABSTRACT

Background: The biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting coro-nary stent (SES) system for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been implanted in a real-world patient population. Aim: The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and performance of MetaforTM sirolimus- eluting coronary stent (SES) system in consecutive patients with CAD in a real-world patient population. Methods: All the consecutive 251 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions with the use of Metafor sirolimus-eluting stents were included in this study. Patients were clinically/tele- phonically followed-up at one-year from August 2015 to August 2016. We observed and analyzed major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the aggregate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and any target lesion revascularization (TLR) at one-year. Also, stent thrombosis (ST) was observed at one-year patients follow-up. Results: We collected and analyzed the data for 251 patients. Out of 251 participants, 191 (76.1%) were males, 95 (37.8%) patients had diabetes, 117 (46.6%) had ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 134 (53.4%) had hypertension. Mean patient age was 56.35 ± 11.23 years. A total of 295 lesions were treated, out of which 13.6% of the lesions were the long lesion of ≥40 mm. At one-year, MACE occurred in 4 (1.6%) of 251 patients, consisting of 2 (0.8%) cardiac deaths, 2 (0.8%) MI, and 0 (0%) TLR. Stent thrombosis was reported in one patient (0.4%). Conclusions: This retrospective data demonstrated excellent safety and performance of Metafor SES in a “real-world” consecutive CAD patient, indicating low rates of MACE and ST at one-year follow-up.

1. Introduction

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are broadly established for treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1] [2] [3] . The DES has been used in diverse real-life clinical practice due to their ability to reduce restenosis rates and the need for repeat revascularization [4] [5] . However, durable polymers in first-generation DES were linked with inflammation, vascular hypersensitivity reaction, late and very late stent thrombosis (ST) [5] . Therefore, efforts to prevent these risks have promoted the clinicians and stent industry to develop DES with biodegradable polymers with improved stent platforms, effective anti-restenosis drug, and polymer carriers [4] . Additionally, biodegradable polymers provide controlled release of anti- restenotic agents and slow degradation of the coating, which would have enhanced the safety and performance of DES [2] [6] . Thus, DES such as Metafor (CE approved) Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent (SES) (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, India) has been developed, which would reduce the risk of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST).

Metafor SES uses a formulation of low dose sirolimus (1.25 μg/mm2) timed to elute in approximately 30 - 40 days from a biodegradable polymer base which degrades simultaneously. Several studies of “limus family” have demonstrated excellent safety and performance in CAD patients in a real-world setting [7] [8] [9] [10] .

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the 12 months results for 251 patients who participated in the study and were treated with Metafor. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at one-year defined as the aggregate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularisation (TLR). The ST was also analyzed in this study. The present “Real-Life” study was undertaken to evaluate safety and performance of using Metafor™ stents in PCIs for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) across a wide range of patients treated in routine clinical practice.

1.1. Study Design and Patient Population

This was a retrospective, single-center, observational, postmarketing study. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data for 251 patients at the Sunshine Heart Institute, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. The study population included 251 patients, with single or multiple restenotic lesion(s) treated with the Metafor SES. This was a single-center study of consecutive patients who underwent stenting for the management of CAD using Metafor SES. The study procedure, data collection, and analysis were performed for all study participants. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration and informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study was approved by Independent Ethics Committee (IEC). The clinical/telephonic follow-up was performed at the following time points: 6 months and 12 months after discharge.

1.2. Device Description and Interventional Procedure

The Metafor SES (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, India) is built on NexGen™, an ultrathin (65 μm) cobalt-chromium platform with a unique cell design comprising of an intelligent mix of open and close cells. The SES is coated with 1.25 μg sirolimus/mm2 of stent surface area. The biodegradable polymer, which acts as a drug carrier, is a thin copolymer formulation combining two biodegradable components namely poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). The Metafor SES is available in sizes of 8, 13, 16, 19, 24, 29, 32, 37, 40, 44, and 48 mm lengths and diameters of 2.00, 2.25, 2.50, 2.75, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, and 4.50 mm.

Coronary interventional procedures were carried out as per the cardiologist’s discretion. Every part of the postoperative medical care, together with dual antiplatelet therapy and statins, were analyzed as per the cardiologist's discretion. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including a loading dose of aspirin as per investigator’s discretion was received by all patients. Aspirin was given along with clopidogrel bisulfate. All patients were maintained on a daily therapeutic dose of 75 mg of clopidogrel bisulfate for a minimum of 1-year. Aspirin ≥75 mg was continued throughout the length of the clinical investigation following index procedure, followed by lifelong aspirin treatment.

The following data were collected in this study: 1) Patient demographic details; 2) Severity of disease; 3) Medical history; 4) Lesion and procedure characteristics; 5) MACE. Patients were followed clinically/telephonically at 6 and 12 months.

1.3. Definitions and Endpoints

The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the rate of MACE. Major adverse cardiac event was defined as the aggregate of cardiac death, MI, and any TLR during the 12 months follow-up period after the index procedure. The ST was also evaluated in this study. The ST was classified according to the definitions of the Academic Research Consortium [11] . Procedural success was defined as successful stent placement at the desired position with <30% residual stenosis by visual estimation, post-procedural TIMI 3 flow and no in-hospital target vessel failure (TVF). At follow-up, data were collected relating to current clinical status, any hospitalization after PCI and occurrence of any MACE and ST.

1.4. Statistical Analysis

Categorical data were presented as counts and percentages. All clinical and continuous angiographic variables were presented as a mean ± standard deviation. The time-to-event curve was presented as per the Kaplan-Meier method. All data were processed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 15 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

2. Results

2.1. Baseline, Lesion and Procedural Characteristics

The analysis consists of baseline clinical data and follow-up data collected at 6 months and 12 months. Mean patients age was 56.35 ± 11.23 years. A total of 251 patients data were collected and analyzed in this study. Out of 251 patients, 191 (76.1%) were males, 95 (37.8%) of patients had diabetes, and 134 (53.4%) of patients were hypertensive. Among 251 patients, 117 (46.6%) and 89 (35.4%) patients were treated with a diagnosis of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and unstable angina. A total of 17 patients underwent primary PCI. The baseline demographics of the patients are outlined in Table 1. Details of the lesion and procedural characteristics are outlined in Table 2. Also, 144 (48.8%) lesions were located in the left anterior descending artery and 5 (2.0%) were in bifurcations. A total of 295 lesions were treated with the Metafor SES (1.18 stents per lesion), and 13.6% of the lesions were treated with the Metafor

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population.

CABG―Coronary artery bypass grafting, CAD―coronary artery disease, MI―myocardial infarction, NSTEMI―non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, PCI―percutaneous coronary intervention, PTCA―percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, STEMI―ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Data are presented as mean ± SD or as number and percentage.

Table 2. Lesion and procedural characteristics.

DVD―double vessel diseases, LAD―left anterior descending coronary artery, LCx―left circumflex coronary artery, LM―left main, RCA―right coronary artery, SVD―single vessel diseases, TVD―triple vessel disease, TIMI―thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.

SES with length ≥40 mm. Baseline lesion and procedural characteristics are mentioned in Table 2. An analysis of baseline angiography revealed that 52.2% of patients had single-vessel diseases (SVD) and 88.95% of patients had stenosis that was treated with Metafor SES stent. The most prevalent target vessel was left anterior descending (LAD) artery (48.8%).

2.2. Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes

During 6-month follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 3 (0.8%) of 251 patients, consisting of 2 (0.8%) cardiac deaths, 1 (0.4%) MI, and 0 (0.0%) TLR, while at one-year, the primary endpoint occurred in 4 (1.6%), consisting of 2 (0.8%) cardiac deaths, 2 (0.8%) MI, and 0 (0.0%) TLR. Also, ST was reported in one patient (0.4%) at 6-month as well as one-year follow-up. The summary of MACE during the one-year study period is presented in Table 3. The time-to- event analysis performed by Kaplan-Meier method was found to be 98% (Figure 1).

Table 3. Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months and 12 months follow-up.

MACE―major adverse cardiac event, MI―myocardial infarction, TLR―target lesion revascularization, TVR―target vessel revascularization, ST―stent thrombosis.

Figure 1. The time-to-event curve at one-year follow-up by Kaplan-Meier method.

3. Discussion

In this retrospective study, the Metafor SES demonstrated excellent safety and performance in a “real-world”, consecutive CAD patient at one-year follow-up. The study included complex coronary artery disease characteristics including patients with diabetes (37.8%), hypertension (53.4%), and unstable angina (35.4%), which represents real clinical practice and allowing us to evaluate the Metafor SES in a “real-world” setting. This study included 251 consecutive patients requiring stenting for the management of CAD.

In this retrospective study, we collected and analyzed the data of Metafor SES with the aim to optimize the safety and performance of Metafor SES. The use of the biodegradable materials is considered to satisfy the concerns over late stent failure and minimize the risk of thrombus formation [2] [4] .

The safety and performance of coronary stent platforms are varied on the following parameters: 1) The design of the stent; 2) The anti-proliferative drug; 3) Type of polymer. The safety and efficacy of “limus family” DES have been confirmed in several clinical studies [7] [8] [9] [10] .

On another concern, strut thickness is a very significant parameter which causes local inflammation at the lesion site. Multiple studies have confirmed that the rate of restenosis was reduced according to strut thickness (strut thickness 50 µm vs 140 µm; a reduction in angiographic restenosis from 25.8% vs 15.0%) [12] [13] [14] . The Metafor SES is based on an ultrathin cobalt-chromium platform; the thin struts enhance the device flexibility and improve device performance. The Metafor SES includes a hybrid cell design, the stent expands from middle to the edges and eliminates the classic dog-boning effect and thus provide excellent stent positioning.

Extensive research suggests that randomized controlled trials or first-in-man studies include a low-risk population and so outcomes of such trials cannot be assumed to “real-world” patients with greater risk coronary anatomy. A precise post-market surveillance study can provide important data of real-world patients treated in a routine clinical practice. Therefore, we analyzed this retrospective observational study to evaluate clinical outcomes of the Metafor SES in consecutive patients treated in a clinical setting.

The most important observations of this single-center, observational study is: 1) 100% procedural success rate; 2) A low rates of MACE (1.6%) and ST (0.4%) at one-year follow-up. At one-year, the primary endpoint (MACE) occurred in 4 (1.6%) patients. This is significantly lower than the 5.0% that was observed in the Nobori DES system (p = 0.014) and the 4.5% that was noted in BioMatrix stent (p = 0.028) [15] [16] . Moreover, ST was reported in only one patient (0.4%). This is comparable with other real-world study of Yukon Choice Flex stent which reported ST of 0.3% at one-year follow-up [4] .

Also, at one-year follow-up period, the cardiac death in this retrospective study was 0.8%. This is comparable with 0.4% patients in RESOLUTE International trial [17] .

Overall, these observations indicate the excellent performance of the Metaphor SES in a real-world setting in high-risk patients.

Moreover, the type of polymer (biodegradable vs durable polymer) and stent platform (cobalt-chromium vs platinum chromium) have resulted in significant improvement in clinical outcomes. In this retrospective study, the rates of MI and TLR were 0.8% and 0.0%, respectively. These are lesser than 15.7% and 2.0% of MI and TLR that were observed in the Promus Element stent [18] . Therefore, the Metafor SES with thinner struts (65 µm) has potential to improve the clinical results.

In present real-world population, lesser MACE rate (1.6%) and ST incidence (0.4%) at one-year follow-up demonstrated constructive clinical outcomes of the Metafor SES. However, longer follow-up of patients receiving the Metafor SES will be necessary to confirm long-term safety of this DES.

4. Study Limitations

Few limitations of this study: 1) Retrospective and observational design; 2) This was a non-randomised, single-arm study without comparison groups; 3) The absence of angiographic follow-up 4) Follow-up time of 12-month was relatively small. Therefore, long-term follow-up is essential to assess the factual event rates.

5. Conclusion

This retrospective data demonstrated excellent safety and performance of Metafor SES in a “real-world” consecutive CAD patient, indicating low rates of MACE and ST at one-year follow-up. Thus, Metafor SES can be implanted safely and routinely in PCI patients.

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the participating patients in this study.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Kasturi, S. , Singh, S. , Kumar Shanivaram, V. , Rao Gollamandala, K. , Mathan, G. , Kumar Bandimida, S. , Pendyala, M. and Challa, C. (2017) One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 7, 233-242. doi: 10.4236/wjcd.2017.78022.

References

[1] Simard, T., Hibbert, B., Chong, A.-Y., et al. (2012) Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting with Zotarolimus (Endeavor) Drug-Eluting Stents. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 80, E15-E22.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23244
[2] Parsa, E., Saroukhani, S., Majlessi, F., et al. (2016) Biodegradable-Polymer Bioli-mus-Eluting Stents versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents at One-Year Follow-Up: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 43, 126- 130.
https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-14-4997
[3] Milewski, K., Gasior, P., Samborski, S., et al. (2016) Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NexGen—An Ultrathin Strut and Hybrid Cell Design Cobalt-Chromium Bare Metal Stent Implanted in a Real Life Patient Population—The Polish NexGen Registry. Advances in Interventional Cardiology, 12, 217-223.
https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2016.61642
[4] Hamon, M., Niculescu, R., Deleanu, D., et al. (2013) Clinical and Angiographic Experience with a Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Orsiro Stent in the Treatment of Single de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions (BIOFLOW-I): A Prospective, First-in- Man Study. Eu-roIntervention, 8, 1006-1011.
https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV8I9A155
[5] Souza, C.F., El Mouallem, A.M., de Brito Junior, F.S., et al. (2013) Safety and Efficacy of Biolimus-Eluting Stent with Biodegradable Polymer: Insights from EINS- TEIN (Evalu-ation of Next-Generation Drug-Eluting STEnt in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) Registry. Einstein (Sao Paulo), 11, 350-356.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082013000300015
[6] Goyal, B.K., Kalmath, B.C., Kawar, R., et al. (2013) Experience with BioMatrix BES and Other DES in All-Comers Setting: A Retrospective Overview. Indian Heart Journal, 65, 678-682.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2013.10.014
[7] Natsuaki, M., Kozuma, K., Morimoto, T., et al. (2013) Biodegradable Polymer Bioli-mus-Eluting Stent versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62, 181-190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.045
[8] Mehta, A.B., Chandra, P., Dalal, J., et al. (2013) One-Year Clinical Outcomes of BioMa-trixTM-Biolimus A9TM Eluting Stent: The E-BioMatrix Multicenter Post Marketing Sur-veillance Registry in India. Indian Heart Journal, 65, 593-599.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2013.08.031
[9] Banker, D., Ahuja, A., Sanadhya, H., et al. (2016) Clinical Performance of Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Unselected Real-World Population with Coronary Artery Disease: Results from the Multicenter CORE Registry. Minerva Cardi-oangiologica, 64, 9-14.
[10] Shetty, R., Vivek, G., Thakkar, A., et al. (2013) Experience with Biodegradable Polymer Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in “Real-Life” Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 24-Month Data from the Manipal-s Registry. Journal of Clinical and Di-agnostic Research, 7, 1959-1963.
[11] Cutlip, D.E., Windecker, S., Mehran, R., et al. (2007) Clinical end Points in Coronary Stent Trials a Case for Standardized Definitions. Circulation, 115, 2344-2351.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313
[12] Di Santo, P., Simard, T., Ramirez, F.D., et al. (2015) Does Stent Strut Design Impact Clinical Outcomes: Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Endeavor Resolute versus Res-olute Integrity Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 38, E296-E304.
https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v38i5.25686
[13] Pache, J., Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., et al. (2003) Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41, 1283-1288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00119-0
[14] Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Dirschinger, J., et al. (2001) Intracoronary Stenting and Angio-graphic Results: Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (ISAR-STEREO) Trial. Circulation, 103, 2816-2821.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.23.2816
[15] Danzi, G.B., Chevalier, B., Urban, P., et al. (2012) Clinical Performance of a Drug- Eluting Stent with a Biodegradable Polymer in an Unselected Patient Population: The NOBORI 2 Study. EuroIntervention, 8, 109-116.
https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV8I1A17
[16] Urban, P., Valdés, M., Menown, I., et al. (2015) Outcomes Following Implantation of the Biolimus A9-Eluting Biomatrix Coronary Stent: Primary Analysis of the e-BioMatrix Registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 86, 1151-1160.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25892
[17] Neumann, F.-J., Widimsky, P., and Belardi, J.A. (2012) One-Year Outcomes of Patients with the Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent: RESOLUTE International Registry. Eu-roIntervention, 7, 1181-1188.
https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV7I10A189
[18] Lee, J.Y., Park, D.W., Kim, Y.H., et al. (2014) Comparison of Biolimus A9-Eluting (Nobori) and Everolimus-Eluting (Promus Element) Stents in Patients with De Novo Native Long Coronary Artery Lesions: A Randomized Long Drug-Eluting Stent V Trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 7, 322-329.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000841

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.