Share This Article:

The Impact of Cognitive Demands on Attention to Facial versus Situational Cues When Judging Emotions

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:164KB) PP. 727-731
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.27111    3,492 Downloads   6,544 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

What information guides how perceivers evaluate people’s emotional experiences? Some regard expressive fa- cial cues to be the critical source of information whereas others argue that situational cues exert the decisive im- pact. This research explored an alternative view suggesting that both information sources are of consequence and that cognitive demands placed on perceivers play a pivotal role in determining what information they use. To test this view, perceivers were given discrepant combinations of facial and situational information about peo- ple’s emotional experiences and identified what emotions they felt. Facial information influenced perceivers’ judgments most often when demands were placed on their cognitive resources. In contrast, situational information had the greatest impact when cognitive demands were minimized. These findings shed light on the debate surrounding the issue of facial versus situational dominance and the process by which emotion judgments are made.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Montepare, J. (2011). The Impact of Cognitive Demands on Attention to Facial versus Situational Cues When Judging Emotions. Psychology, 2, 727-731. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.27111.

References

[1] Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290. doi:10.1037/h0055756
[2] Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.
[3] Carroll, J. M., & Russell, J. A. (1996). Do facial expression signal spe- cific emotions? Judging emotion from the face in context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 205-218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.205
[4] Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: J. Murray. doi:10.1037/10001-000
[5] DePaulo, B., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of so- cial psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 3-34). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[6] Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200. doi:10.1080/02699939208411068
[7] Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[8] Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1982). What are the relative contributions of facial behavior and contextual information to the judgment of emotion? In P. Ekman (Ed.), Emotion in the human face (pp. 111-127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Fernandez-Dols, J. M., Sierra, B., & Ruiz-Belda, M. A. (1993). On the clarity of expressive and contextual information in the recognition of emotions: A methodological critique. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 195-202. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230207
[10] Fernandez-Dols, J. M., Wallbott, H., & Sanchez, F. (1991). Emotion category accessibility and the decoding of emotion from facial ex- pression and context. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 107-123. doi:10.1007/BF00998266
[11] Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego: Academic Press.
[12] Gilbert, D. T., & Krull, D. S. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance. Journal of Personality and So- cial Psychology, 54, 193-201. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.193
[13] Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733
[14] Goodenough, F. L., & Tinker, M. A. (1931). The relative potency of facial expression and verbal description of stimulus in the judgment of emotion. Comparative Psychology, 12, 365-370. doi:10.1037/h0071381
[15] Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2007). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (5th ed.) Wadsworth: Thomas Learning.
[16] Izard, C. E. (1994). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 288-299. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.288
[17] Nakamura, M., Buck, R., & Kenny, D. A. (1990). Relative contribution of expressive behavior and contextual information to the judgment of the emotional state of another. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1032-1103. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1032
[18] Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S., Hirayama, S., & Petrova, G. (2005). Develop- ment and validation of a measure of display rule knowledge: The display rule assessment inventory. Emotion, 5, 23-40. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.23
[19] Patterson, M. L., & Stockbridge, E. (1998). Effects of cognitive demand and judgment accuracy on person perception accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 253-264. doi:10.1023/A:1022996522793
[20] Russell, J. (1997). Reading emotions from and into faces: Resurrecting dimensional-contextual perspective. In J. Russell, & J. M. Fernan- dez-Dols (Eds.), The psychology of facial expression (pp. 295-320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[21] Stanley, D. J., & Meyer, J. P (2009). Two-dimensional affective space: A new approach to orienting the axes. Emotion, 9, 214-237.
[22] Tomkins, S. S. (1962-1963). Affect, imagery, consciousness (Vol. 1-2). New York: Springer. doi:10.1037/a0014612

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.