Share This Article:

Copper Adsorption from Wasterwater Using Bone Charcoal

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1197KB) PP. 139-147
DOI: 10.4236/ampc.2017.75012    1,002 Downloads   1,529 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Bone charcoal (BC) is being developed as a treatment for decontamination of polluted water. In this study, bone charcoal was obtained by pyrolysis of cow bones and tested for the elimination of copper from aqueous solutions. The minimum time to reach the removal equilibrium by adsorption was 10 min with a maximum of copper removal equal to 9615 mg/g. Different kinetics models were applied to fit the experimental data: the pseudo second-order model correlated the results with a linear correlation coefficient equal to 1.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals are inorganic pollutants frequently found in the wastewaters of several industries such as electroplating, mining, metal processing, petroleum refining, textile, tanneries, paint manufacture, pesticides, battery manufacturing, pigment manufacture, photographic industries and printing [1] [2] [3] . These inorganic pollutants have a negative impact on the environment and modify the physical and chemical characteristics of water and soil [4] [5] , and the properties of aquatic fauna and flora [6] . Furthermore, the presence of heavy metal ions in industrial wastewater, irrigation and drinking water resources has also high negative impacts on human health due to their toxicity [7] . So the elimination of these heavy metals from wastewaters is one of the most important environmental problems for research, engineering and technology development on water management in environment [8] [9] .

The purification of heavy metals contaminated wastewaters can be realized by chemical precipitation [8] , ions exchanges membranes [10] , electrochemical systems [11] [12] , electrodialysis [13] , coagulation-flocculation [14] [15] and removal by materials adsorption [16] [17] . This last method is very economic and efficient to improve the water quality. In this aim, different materials have been used to adsorb heavy metals, such as activated sludge [18] , synthetic adsorbents [19] [20] , biosorbents [21] and clays [22] [23] . The adsorbent materials must be cheap, easy to operate and simple for design.

The objective of this study is to develop cheap and effective adsorbents from the biological wastes, such as cow bone, to replace the classical commercial adsorbents. So cow bone from which the bone charcoal was derived, is used as an adsorbent and investigated for its adsorption properties towards copper ions. The influences of different experimental parameters, such as the amount of BC and the contact time, have been investigated. Different kinetics models were also applied to fit the experimental data.

2. Materials

2.1. Adsorbate

A stock of copper solution (888.7 ppm) was prepared by dissolving CuSO4∙5H2O in distilled water.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Cortical bovines have been collected from the local slaughter houses in Sfax, Tunisia. The bone samples have been washed and cleaned using boiling method to eliminate organic substances and collagen, to avoid soot developing in the material during the pyrolysis process. Cow bones were boiled in water for 3 h at 99.5˚C. Then the water was eliminated and the bones were washed using fresh water [24] . At this moment, the bones were dried in an oven at 80˚C. The dried bones were crushed and milled into different particle sizes and after calcined for 2 h at 800˚C with a mixture of oxygen/nitrogen (25/75 vol%) [25] . The resulting material was denominated as Bone Charcoal (BC). The resulted BC was crushed again and refined to obtain a powder with particles sizes < 50 µm and finally stored in hermetic bottles for subsequent uses.

2.3. Instrumental

Carbonization was carried out in a vertical stainless-steel reactor (length = 170 mm, internal diameter = 22 mm), which was placed into a cylindrical electric furnace Nabertherm. Mineralogical analysis of the BC sample was realized by X-ray diffraction (Bruker D8) and showed the characteristic peaks of amorphous carbon [26] . An IR transmittance spectrum of the BC sample was carried out in the 500 - 2000 cm1 range using a SHIMATZU IR 470 spectrometer. The specific surface area (m2/g) of BC was determined from nitrogen adsorption-de- sorption isotherm with the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. The macroporous volume of BC was measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry (Joschek et al., 2000). The concentration of copper was carried out by atomic absorption spectrometry (HITACHI Z-6100).

3. Methods

3.1. Adsorption Experiments

The adsorption experiments were determined according to the batch experiments at room temperature (25˚C). 0.1 g of BC was mixed with a 50 mL of copper solution at different concentrations (0 - 500 mg/L). The deviation of the pH of the contaminated heavy metal solution during copper adsorption was measured for all experiments, with an experimental deviation = ±1. The initial pH was fixed <5.5 to avoid precipitation of Cu(OH)2.

The quantity of adsorbed copper, qt, on BC is calculated according to Equation (1):

(1)

where Co is the initial concentration of copper (mg/L), Ce is the residual concentration of copper (mg/L), m is the mass of BC (g) and V is the volume of the copper solution (L).

3.2. Adsorption Kinetics Modeling

In order to examine the mechanism of adsorption processes, the pseudo first- order adsorption, the pseudo second-order adsorption and the intraparticle diffusion models were used to adjust kinetic experimental data. The amount of BC sample (0.25 g) is mixed with a 50 mL of copper solution (10 mg/L) to carry out adsorption experiments in bath mode.

3.2.1. Pseudo First-Order Model

The pseudo first-order rate expression of Lagergren is usually described by the following Equations (2) and (3) [27] :

(2)

where qe is the amount of copper adsorbed on BC at the equilibrium time (mg/g), qt is the amount of copper adsorbed on BC at time t (mg/g) and K1 is the rate constant of pseudo first-order adsorption (1/min). Integrating and applying the boundary condition, for t = 0, qt = 0 and for t = t, qe = qt, Equation (2) takes the following form:

(3)

where K1 was determined from the slope of linear plot of 1/qt against 1/t.

3.2.2. Pseudo Second-Order Model

The pseudo second-order mechanism for adsorption is shown in Equation (4) [28] [29] :

(4)

where qt is the adsorption capacity at time t (mg/g), K2 is the rate constant of pseudo second-order adsorption (1/min). Integration and applying the boundary conditions, for t = 0, qt = 0 and for t = t, qe = qt, Equation (4) takes the following form:

(5)

If the second order kinetic model is applicable, the plot of t/qt against t of Equation (5) should give a linear relationship from which qe and K2 can be established.

3.2.3. Intraparticle Diffusion Model

The intraparticle diffusion model presented by Allen et al. [30] could be a rate- limiting step and is shown in Equation (6):

(6)

where qt is the adsorption capacity at time t (mg/g), K3 is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant (mg/(g∙min1/2)) and C is the intercept.

3.3. Copper Desorption

Desorption studies were performed in two phases [31] :

Phase 1: Adsorption. 0.25 g of BC was placed in contact with 50 mL of a 50 mg/L of copper solution. BC was then collected by filtration, washed with distilled water and placed in an oven for 12 h at 60˚C. The liquid phase was analyzed by AAS (HITACHI).

Phase 2: Desorption. The dry and saturated BC was placed in contact with 50 mL of 0.1 M HCl, NaOH, NaCl and distilled water for 2 h. The liquid phase was filtered and analyzed by AAS (HITACHI). The desorbed copper percentage was determined according to Equation (7):

(7)

where Qdes is the amount of desorbed copper from BC (mg/g) and Qads is the amount of copper adsorbed onto BC (mg/g).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Characterization of Bone Charcoal (BC)

The bones are composed of inorganic (65 wt%) and organic (35 wt%) components. The principal inorganic component of bone is hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2(HA). Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectrum in the 500 - 2000 cm−1 range of BC. Only the bands characteristic of HA (554 - 960 cm−1) are presented [32] . The diffractogram of BC (not shown here) shows only the characteristic pattern of HA. These results confirm that the organic components are eliminated from the bone samples after calcination at 800˚C for 2 h [32] [33] .

The specific surface area of BC, SBET, is equal to 75 m2/g and the macroporous (pore size > 50 nm) volume of BC, determined by mercury porosimetry, is equal to 0.9 cm3/g.

Figure 1. FTIR spectrum of bone charcoal.

4.2. Kinetic Studies

Figure 2 shows the effect of contact time, t, on the removal of 50 mg/L of Cu by BC. The adsorption of Cu increases with time to reach an equilibrium after 10 min of mixing and agitation (red points in Figure 2).

The three kinetic models explained in paragraph 3.2 are used in this study and the results are shown in Figures 3-5. The values of coefficients for the three models are calculated. The correlation coefficient for the pseudo second-order kinetic model is higher (R2 = 1, Figure 4) than both other models. This result indicates that the copper adsorption is controlled by a chemisorption process at the surface of BC [34] . The rate constant of pseudo second-order adsorption, K2, represents the number of exchanges between Ca ions in BC and Cu ions present in aqueous solution [35] . Furthermore, the theoretical qe values acquired from the pseudo second-order kinetic model are in accordance with the experimental qe values.

4.3. Copper Desorption

Figure 6 shows the percentage of desorbed copper for the four different chemical agents used in this study. HCl shows the highest efficiency with approximately 2.521% of desorbed copper in 2 h. None of the used solutions provoke any apparent physical damages to the adsorbent. Nevertheless, the desorption level of copper with 3 types of aqueous solution (alkaline, neutral and acidic) remains very low. This confirms the strong covalent bonds established between BC and copper ions. So, to regenerate BC, treatments at high temperatures are necessary to break the bonds between BC and copper ions.

5. Conclusions

This study investigates heavy metal ions adsorption onto economical Bone Charcoal (BC) adsorbent originating from cow bones. This adsorbent seems to

Figure 2. Effect of contact time on copper adsorption onto BC.

Figure 3. Pseudo first-order kinetic model of copper adsorption onto BC.

Figure 4. Pseudo second-order kinetic model of copper adsorption onto BC.

Figure 5. Intraparticle diffusion kinetic model of copper adsorption onto BC.

Figure 6. Copper desorption from BC using different chemical desorption reagents.

be efficient to remove the maximum of copper pollution from water, with 0.1 g of BC amount after 10 min. The kinetic studies of copper adsorption on BC indicate that the pseudo second-order model is the most adequate. This result indicates that the copper adsorption is controlled by a chemisorption process at the surface of BC. Although it is potentially a new alternative for the elimination of heavy metals from polluted water, the desorption of copper ions is difficult by the existence of strong covalent bonds between BC and copper ions.

Acknowledgements

One of us (S. D. L) thanks to the Belgian “Fonds National de Recherche Scientifique” (FRS-FNRS) for her Associate Research position. Furthermore, one other of us (S. G.) thanks to the Laboratory of Water, Environment and Energy, Sfax, Tunisia for the financial funds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Ghrab, S. , Benzina, M. and Lambert, S. (2017) Copper Adsorption from Wasterwater Using Bone Charcoal. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 7, 139-147. doi: 10.4236/ampc.2017.75012.

References

[1] Fuge, R. (2013) Anthropogenic Sources. In: Selinus, O., Ed., Essentials of Medical Geology: Revised Edition, Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, 59-74.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4375-5_4
[2] Ahmaruzzaman, M. (2011) Industrial Wastes as Low-Cost Potential Adsorbents for the Treatment of Wastewater Laden with Heavy Metals. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 166, 36-59.
[3] Kadirvelu, K., Thamaraiselvi, K. and Namasivayam, C. (2001) Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters by Adsorption onto Activated Carbon Prepared from an Agricultural Solid Waste. Bioresource Technology, 76, 63-65.
[4] Houda, B., Dorra, G., Chafai, A., Emna, A. and Khaled, M. (2011) Impact of a Mixed “Industrial and Domestic” Wastewater Effluent on the Southern Coastal Sediments of Sfax (Tunisia) in the Mediterranean Sea. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 691-704.
[5] Guptaa, S., Nayeka, S. and Sahab, R.N. (2010) Temporal Changes and Depth Wise Variations in Pit Pond Hydrochemistry Contaminated with Industrial Effluents with Special Emphasis on Metal Distribution in Water-Sediment System. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183, 125-131.
[6] Das, D., Charumathi, D. and Das, N. (2011) Bioaccumulation of the Synthetic Dye Basic Violet 3 and Heavy Metals in Single and Binary Systems by Candida tropicalis Grown in a Sugarcane Bagasse Extract Medium: Modelling Optimal Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Inhibition Kinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186, 1541-1552.
[7] Amin, N., Hussain, A., Alamzeb, S. and Begum, S. (2013) Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Edible Parts of Vegetables Irrigated with Waste Water and Their Daily Intake to Adults and Children, District Mardan, Pakistan. Food Chemistry, 136, 1515-1523.
[8] Kurniawan, T.A., Chan, G.Y.S., Lo, W.H. and Babel, S. (2006) Physico-Chemical Treatment Techniques for Wastewater Laden with Heavy Metals. Chemical Engineering Journal, 118, 83-98.
[9] Fu, F. and Wang, Q. (2011) Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewaters: A Review. Journal ofEnvironment Management, 92, 407-418.
[10] Kolodynska, D., Geca, M., Siek, M. and Hubicki, Z. (2013) Nitrilotris(Methylene- phosphonic) Acid as a Complexing Agent in Sorption of Heavy Metal Ions on Ions Exchangers. Chemical Engineering Journal, 215-216, 948-958.
[11] Kim, G., Ebenezer, T., George, Z. and Chen, A. (2014) A Sunlight Assisted Dual Purpose Photoelectrochemical Cell for Low Voltage Removal of Heavy Metals and Organic Pollutants in Wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 244, 411-421.
[12] Tao, H.C., Lei, T., Shi, G., Sun, X.-N., Wei, X.-Y., Zhang, L.-J. and Wu, W.-N. (2014) Removal of Heavy Metals from Fly Ash Leachate Using Combined Bioelectrochemical Systems and Electrolysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 264, 1-7.
[13] Mohammadi, T., Moheb, A., Sadrzadeh, M. and Razmi, A. (2005) Modeling of Metal Ion Removal from Wastewater by Electrodialysis. Separation and Purification Technology, 41, 73-82.
[14] Bratskaya, S.Y., Pestov, A.V., Yatluk, Y.G. and Avramenko, V.A. (2009) Heavy Metals Removal by Flocculation/Precipitation Using N-(2-Carboxyethyl)Chitosans. Colloids and Surfaces A, 339, 140-144.
[15] Pang, F.M, Kumar, P., Teng, T.T., Mohd Omar, A.K. and Wasewar, K.L. (2011) Removal of Lead, Zinc and Iron by Coagulation-Flocculation. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 42, 809-815.
[16] Chaari, I., Fakhfakh, E., Chakroun, S., Bouzid, J. and Boujelben, N. (2008) Lead Removal from Aqueous Solutions by a Tunisian Smectitic Clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 156, 545-551.
[17] Boujelben, N., Bouzid, J. and Elouear, Z. (2009) Adsorption of Nickel and Copper onto Natural Iron Oxide-Coated Sand from Aqueous Solutions: Study in Single and Binary Systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163, 376-382.
[18] Moisés, T.P., Patricia, B.H., Barrera-Díaz, B.E., Gabriela, R.M. and Natividad-Rangel, R. (2010) Treatment of Industrial Effluents by a Continuous System: Electrocoagulation-Activated Sludge. Bioresource Technology, 101, 7761-7766.
[19] Naiya, T.K., Bhattacharya, A.K. and Das, S.K. (2009) Adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) from Aqueous Solutions on Activated Alumina. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 333, 14-26.
[20] Ji, F., Li, C., Tang, B., Xu, J. and Lu, G. (2012) Preparation of Cellulose Acetate/ Zeolite Composite Fiber and Its Adsorption Behavior for Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Solution. Chemical Engineering Journal, 209, 325-333.
[21] Zafar, M.N., Nadeemb, R. and Hanif, M.A. (2007) Biosorption of Nickel from Protonated Rice Bran. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 143, 478-485.
[22] Yavuz, O.M., Altunkaynak, Y. and Fuat, G. (2003) Removal of Copper, Nickel, Cobalt and Manganese from Aqueous Solution by Kaolinite. Water Research, 37, 948-952.
[23] Ghrab, S., Boujelben, N., Medhioub, M. and Jamoussi, F. (2014) Chromium and Nickel Removal from Industrial Wastewater Using Tunisian Clay. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 2253-2260.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.805165
[24] Toque, J.A., Herliansyah, M.K., Hamdi, M., Ide-Ektessabi, A. and Wildan, A.M. (2007) The Effect of Sample Preparation and Calcination Temperature on the Production of Hydroxyapatite from Bovine Bone Powders. Proceedings of the 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,11-14 December 2007, 152-155.
[25] Moreno-Piraján, J.C. and Giraldo, L. (2010) Adsorption of Copper from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbons Obtained by Pyrolysis of Cassava Peel. Journal of Analytical Applied Pyrolysis, 87, 188-193.
[26] Job, N., Heinrichs, B., Ferauche, F., Noville, F., Marien, J. and Pirard, J.P. (2005) Hydrodechlorination of 1,2-Dichloroethane on Pd-Ag Catalysts Supported on Tailored Texture Carbon Xerogels. Catalysis Today, 102-103, 234-241.
[27] Srihari, V. and Das, A. (2008) The Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Phenol-Sorption onto Three Agro-Based Carbons. Desalination, 225, 220-234.
[28] Wu, F.C., Tseng, R.L. and Juang, R.S. (2001) Kinetic Modeling of Liquid-Phase Adsorption of Reactive Dyes and Metal Ions on Chitosan. Water Research, 35, 613-618.
[29] Antonioa, P., Iha, K. and Suárez-Iha, M.E.V. (2007) Kinetic Modeling of Adsorption of Di-2-Pyridylketone Salicyloylhydrazone on Silica Gel. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 307, 24-28.
[30] Allen, S.J., Mckay, G. and Khader, K.Y.H. (1989) Intraparticle Diffusion of a Basic Dye During Adsorption onto Sphagnum Peat. Environmental Pollutions, 56, 39-50.
[31] Cechinel, M.A.P., Ulson de Souza, S.M.A.G. and Ulson de Souza, A.A. (2014) Study of Lead (II) Adsorption onto Activated Carbon Originating from Cow Bone. Journal of Cleaner Products, 65, 342-349.
[32] Figueiredo, M., Fernando, A., Martins, G., Freitas, J. and Judas, F. (2010) Effect of the Calcination Temperature on the Composition and Microstructure of Hydroxyapatite Derived from Human and Animal Bone. Ceramics International, 36, 2383-2393.
[33] Barakat, N.A.M., Khalil, K.A., Faheem, A., Sheikh, A.M. and Omran, M. (2008) Physiochemical Characterizations of Hydroxyapatite Extracted from Bovine Bones by Three Different Methods: Extraction of Biologically Desirable. Materials Science and Engineering C, 28, 1381-1387.
[34] Pérez, J.T., Solache-Rios, M. and Colin-Cruz, A. (2008) Sorption and Desorption of Dye Remazol Yellow onto a Mexican Surfactant-Modified Clinoptilolite-Rich Tuff and a Carbonaceous Material from Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 187, 303-313.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9518-6
[35] Hassan, S.S.N., Awwad, S.N. and Aboterika, A.H.A. (2008) Removal of Mercury(II) from Wastewater Using Camel Bone Charcoal. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, 992-997.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.